[Bug ada/65477] gnat is built with nodlopen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65477 --- Comment #1 from Pavel Zhukov --- This patch works for me: Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9275707 Patch: diff --git a/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in b/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in index b552d3d..69d55aa 1006

[Bug c++/65485] New: Use openmp in dynamic library but not in calling program causes segfault at the end of execution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65485 Bug ID: 65485 Summary: Use openmp in dynamic library but not in calling program causes segfault at the end of execution Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/65347] [F03] Final subroutine not called for function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65347 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|

[Bug ada/65477] gnat is built with nodlopen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65477 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/65486] New: ICE: in type_natural_mode, at config/i386/i386.c:6646

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65486 Bug ID: 65486 Summary: ICE: in type_natural_mode, at config/i386/i386.c:6646 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug fortran/65469] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ICE on bad code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65469 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug c++/65485] Use openmp in dynamic library but not in calling program causes segfault at the end of execution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65485 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/65454] Extending both forms of relational operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65454 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug c++/65072] Segfault when parsing dectlype in trailing return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65072 --- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek --- Likely started with r151360 -- which doesn't reveal much, this rev was a part of LTO merge, dealing with gimplification of types and symbols.

[Bug c++/65485] Use openmp in dynamic library but not in calling program causes segfault at the end of execution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65485 --- Comment #2 from thomas.izard at silkan dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Can't reproduce, works just fine here (Fedora 21, x86_64). Do you launch the program several times ? Some executions are correct (program does no

[Bug other/65487] New: fdump-passes uses random function as context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65487 Bug ID: 65487 Summary: fdump-passes uses random function as context Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug other/65487] fdump-passes uses random function as context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65487 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|un

[Bug other/65487] fdump-passes uses random function as context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65487 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/65487] fdump-passes uses random function as context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65487 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from vrie

[Bug other/65487] fdump-passes uses random function as context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65487 --- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- patch approved for stage1: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-03/msg01054.html

[Bug libstdc++/65470] regex_search corrupts matches when haystack is destroyed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65470 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/65470] regex_search corrupts matches when haystack is destroyed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65470 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Your program's invalid for other reasons too, you can't mix strdup and delete.

[Bug fortran/65454] Extending both forms of relational operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65454 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/65488] New: parloops runs for functions it doesn't process

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65488 Bug ID: 65488 Summary: parloops runs for functions it doesn't process Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: P3 Component: tre

[Bug rtl-optimization/64164] [4.9/5 Regression] one more stack slot used due to one less inlining level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164 --- Comment #23 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 20 Mar 2015, law at redhat dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164 > > --- Comment #22 from Jeffrey A. Law --- > Let's try to stay focused. Killing copyrena

[Bug lto/65475] [5 Regression] ICE in odr_vtable_hasher::equal (Segmentation fault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65475 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Unfortunately, there is another problem with applied patch: $ cat 1.ii namespace std { class exception {}; class runtime_error : exception { virtual char m_fn1(); } a; } $ cat 2.ii namespace std { class ex

[Bug tree-optimization/65488] parloops runs for functions it doesn't process

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65488 --- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- After committing the fix for PR65487, moving !parallelized_function_p (fun->decl) and !fun->has_nonlocal_label to the gate function doesn't give any interference anymore with -fdump-passes. In orde

[Bug c/65486] ICE: in type_natural_mode, at config/i386/i386.c:6646

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65486 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug libstdc++/65470] regex_search corrupts matches when haystack is destroyed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65470 --- Comment #8 from aral at gmx dot de --- I agree that updating the documentation exceeds the responsibility of this bug reporting system, and if the behavior is intended, it is not a bug. The severity was referring to the case had the behavior b

[Bug tree-optimization/65488] parloops runs for functions it doesn't process

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65488 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Another way of dealing with this is to add a TODO_nodump or TODO_earlyout: ... @@ -2395,7 +2408,7 @@ unsigned pass_parallelize_loops::execute (function *fun) { if (number_of_loops (fun) <= 1) -

[Bug target/65486] ICE: in type_natural_mode, at config/i386/i386.c:6646

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65486 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target|

[Bug ipa/65483] bzip2 bsR/bsW should be auto-inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65483 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC|rguenther at suse dot de |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug ipa/65478] [5 regression] crafty performance regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65478 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target Milestone|

[Bug ada/65102] gnat-style.texi warning from including fdl.texi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65102 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- gnat-style.texi part approved: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg01337.html requested approval for fdl.texi part from docs co-maintainer: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-03/msg0

[Bug ada/65451] [5 regression] compiler crash on volatile access type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65451 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Fri Mar 20 10:15:33 2015 New Revision: 221531 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221531&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ada/65451 * gcc-interface/utils.c (gnat_pushdecl): Tidy up

[Bug ada/65451] [5 regression] compiler crash on volatile access type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65451 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/65489] New: [5.0 Regression] Testcase for PR 65427 ICEs at -Os on arm-none-eabi in hoist pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65489 Bug ID: 65489 Summary: [5.0 Regression] Testcase for PR 65427 ICEs at -Os on arm-none-eabi in hoist pass Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug target/65489] [5.0 Regression] Testcase for PR 65427 ICEs at -Os on arm-none-eabi in hoist pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65489 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed

[Bug target/65486] ICE: in type_natural_mode, at config/i386/i386.c:6646

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65486 --- Comment #3 from David Abdurachmanov --- Forgot this is on x86_64. Also tested with Clang 3.5, which worked fine. It seems to that it's also ICE'ing on AArch64, but in expr.c if a single long double is in a vector. I will file another bug re

[Bug c++/59739] missed optimization: attribute ((pure)) with aggregate returns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59739 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug lto/65475] [5 Regression] ICE in odr_vtable_hasher::equal (Segmentation fault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65475 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/65474] sub-optimal code for __builtin_abs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65474 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/65072] Segfault when parsing dectlype in trailing return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65072 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10

[Bug ada/65490] New: terminals.c:1266:21: warning: argument to ‘sizeof’ in ‘bzero’ call is the same expression as the destination

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65490 Bug ID: 65490 Summary: terminals.c:1266:21: warning: argument to ‘sizeof’ in ‘bzero’ call is the same expression as the destination Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCO

[Bug target/65491] New: [aarch64] ICE: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3609

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65491 Bug ID: 65491 Summary: [aarch64] ICE: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3609 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ta

[Bug fortran/61275] Invalid initialization expression for ALLOCATABLE component in structure constructor at (1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61275 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug target/65491] [aarch64] ICE: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3609

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65491 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/65470] regex_search corrupts matches when haystack is destroyed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65470 Sergey Zubkov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cubbi at cubbi dot org --- Comment #9 fr

[Bug c++/65072] Segfault when parsing dectlype in trailing return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65072 --- Comment #11 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10) > Actually, sorry for the error, it really started with r151529. Thanks -- I think I have a fix now.

[Bug target/62109] __gthr_i486_lock_cmp_xchg missing clobber

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62109 --- Comment #9 from Kai Tietz --- (In reply to David from comment #8) > (In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #7) > The first code block in comment #6 is what is in the code now. As you can > see, it already has the #define you are describing. I

[Bug fortran/65469] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ICE on bad code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65469 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/61275] Invalid initialization expression for ALLOCATABLE component in structure constructor at (1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61275 --- Comment #5 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Completely right, the initial test is still not compilable. But this is because assigning to an allocatable component in an initializer is not allowed by the standards: F2003, 7.1.7 (3) and also in

[Bug tree-optimization/65492] New: Bad optimization in -O3 on SSE intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65492 Bug ID: 65492 Summary: Bad optimization in -O3 on SSE intrinsics Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-

[Bug tree-optimization/65492] Bad optimization in -O3 on SSE intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65492 --- Comment #1 from Allan Jensen --- Created attachment 35070 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35070&action=edit main

[Bug tree-optimization/65492] Bad optimization in -O3 on SSE intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65492 --- Comment #2 from Allan Jensen --- Created attachment 35071 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35071&action=edit vector union test

[Bug tree-optimization/65492] Bad optimization in -O3 on SSE intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65492 --- Comment #3 from Allan Jensen --- The -O3 regression seems to go back a long way, but has become lesser over time. With gcc 4.6 and older it runs at 3.1s with -O3, and still at 1.8s with -O2.

[Bug lto/65239] typeinfo / VTT for some classes not visibile in shared library when LTO is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65239 --- Comment #1 from Jana Saout --- Mmmh, the issue disappeared in the gcc of today. (so it was probably fixed sometime between March 16th and March 20th)

[Bug lto/65239] typeinfo / VTT for some classes not visibile in shared library when LTO is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65239 --- Comment #2 from Jana Saout --- No, sorry, ignore that last one... my mistake - it's still there.

[Bug fortran/61275] Invalid initialization expression for ALLOCATABLE component in structure constructor at (1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61275 --- Comment #6 from Antony Lewis --- Not sure about that - 7.1.12 of 2008 is about constants, but in the example the type instance is not a constant? The example is fine in ifort (and used in cosmomc?). Antony > -Original Message- > Fro

[Bug tree-optimization/64715] [5 Regression] __builtin_object_size (..., 1) fails to locate subobject

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64715 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Mar 20 12:39:32 2015 New Revision: 221532 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221532&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-03-20 Richard Biener PR middle-end/64715 * tree-chrec

[Bug target/65459] SLOW_UNALIGNED_ACCESS unconditionally set to 1 for ARM targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65459 renlin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |renlin at gcc dot gnu.

[Bug fortran/61275] Invalid initialization expression for ALLOCATABLE component in structure constructor at (1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61275 --- Comment #7 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- First sentence of F2008, 7.1.12 is: A constant expression is an expression with limitations that make it suitable for use as a kind type parameter, *initializer*, or named constant. It i

[Bug c/65493] New: bug with 64/32 division sign related to various factors (-O3)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65493 Bug ID: 65493 Summary: bug with 64/32 division sign related to various factors (-O3) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/65493] bug with 64/32 division sign related to various factors (-O3)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65493 --- Comment #1 from sophana --- Forgot to say that the result is the same on all tested gcc versions on various targets. All work with -O1 and not with -O3

[Bug c/65493] bug with 64/32 division sign related to various factors (-O3)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65493 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/65492] Bad optimization in -O3 on SSE intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65492 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target|

[Bug tree-optimization/65492] Bad optimization in -O3 on SSE intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65492 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Unrolling of the inner loop accounts for the rest (both conditional moves with if-conversion applied and the branchy code if not seems to put a too heavy load on the branch predictor(?) when inside another l

[Bug target/65456] powerpc64le autovectorized copy loop missed optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65456 --- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt --- Pish, those adds shouldn't be the least bit relevant. I'll have a look.

[Bug fortran/61275] Invalid initialization expression for ALLOCATABLE component in structure constructor at (1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61275 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- module A Type T character(LEN=:), allocatable :: S end type character(len=6), parameter :: str = 'string' Type(T) :: TestObj = T(str) end module is rejected with Type(T) ::

[Bug tree-optimization/65492] Bad optimization in -O3 on SSE intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65492 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/65493] bug with 64/32 division sign related to various factors (-O3)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65493 sophana changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #3 from sophana --- Thanks

[Bug tree-optimization/65494] New: [5.0 Regression] Loop is not vectorized because of operand canonicalization.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65494 Bug ID: 65494 Summary: [5.0 Regression] Loop is not vectorized because of operand canonicalization. Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug target/65459] SLOW_UNALIGNED_ACCESS unconditionally set to 1 for ARM targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65459 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/65494] [5.0 Regression] Loop is not vectorized because of operand canonicalization.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65494 --- Comment #1 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- Created attachment 35072 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35072&action=edit test-case to reproduce The following options are used to reproduce: -Ofast -funroll-loops

[Bug c++/65072] Segfault when parsing dectlype in trailing return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65072 --- Comment #12 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Mar 20 14:56:53 2015 New Revision: 221535 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221535&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/65072 * typeck.c (lookup_anon_field): Make sure we're d

[Bug c++/65072] Segfault when parsing dectlype in trailing return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65072 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/64715] [5 Regression] __builtin_object_size (..., 1) fails to locate subobject

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64715 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 35073 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35073&action=edit WIP patch So, on top of what you've committed, here is my unfinished attempt to disable for __bos undesirable

[Bug target/65495] New: ICE: chkp_make_addressed_object_bounds: Unexpected tree code const_decl with -fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx and fortran

without-cloog --without-ppl Thread model: posix gcc version 5.0.0 20150320 (experimental) (GCC) Tested revisions: r221530 - ICE

[Bug tree-optimization/65494] [5.0 Regression] Loop is not vectorized because of operand canonicalization.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65494 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/65494] [5 Regression] Loop is not vectorized because of operand canonicalization.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65494 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0 Summary|[5.0 Regression]

[Bug target/65496] New: ICE: in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2318 with -O3 -fsched2-use-superblocks -mavx512dq --param=max-pending-list-length=0

ble-languages=c,c++,lto,fortran --prefix=/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/binary-221530-lto-fortran-checking-yes-rtl-df/ --without-cloog --without-ppl Thread model: posix gcc version 5.0.0 20150320 (experimental) (GCC) Tested revisions: r221530 - ICE

[Bug c++/65497] New: Call to member function template named the same as class template is rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65497 Bug ID: 65497 Summary: Call to member function template named the same as class template is rejected Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug c++/47765] [Core/1391] Wrong template deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47765 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|SUSPENDED

[Bug c++/48324] [C++0x] constexpr evaluation should respect lifetime rules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48324 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Comm

[Bug c++/48453] [C++0x] [DR 1287] Invalid reference initialization via explicit conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48453 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |NEW --- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini -

[Bug c++/17729] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Duplicate __attribute__((deprecated)) warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17729 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/48453] [C++0x] [DR 1287] Invalid reference initialization via explicit conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48453 --- Comment #9 from Daniel Krügler --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #8) > This is now in C++14. Time to add the testcase and close the bug. I agree.

[Bug go/65462] Use of 'go get' with gccgo is not finding dependencies correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65462 --- Comment #1 from boger at us dot ibm.com --- Created attachment 35077 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35077&action=edit Fix dependencies in go tool for gccgo The code to determine when to import packages was not quite catc

[Bug c++/65497] Call to member function template named the same as class template is rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65497 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/61642] g++ confuses template member template function with template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61642 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lucdanton at free dot fr --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/48453] [C++0x] [DR 1287] Invalid reference initialization via explicit conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48453 --- Comment #10 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Mar 20 17:06:18 2015 New Revision: 221537 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221537&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-03-20 Paolo Carlini PR c++/48453 * g++.dg/cpp

[Bug c++/48453] [C++0x] [DR 1287] Invalid reference initialization via explicit conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48453 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/65494] [5 Regression] Loop is not vectorized because of operand canonicalization.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65494 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- vect_build_slp_tree apparently has code to handle (limited number) of permutations for commutative operands, but even if I bump the && *npermutes < 4 test to && *npermutes < 32, for some reason we still don't

[Bug c++/48324] [C++0x] constexpr evaluation should respect lifetime rules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48324 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Please.

[Bug c/65345] ICE with _Generic selection on _Atomic int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65345 --- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek --- A note to myself: address the TARGET_ATOMIC_ASSIGN_EXPAND_FENV implementations: .

[Bug c++/48324] [C++0x] constexpr evaluation should respect lifetime rules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48324 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Mar 20 17:26:32 2015 New Revision: 221539 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221539&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-03-20 Paolo Carlini PR c++/48324 * g++.dg/cpp0

[Bug c++/48324] [C++0x] constexpr evaluation should respect lifetime rules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48324 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/65496] ICE: in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2318 with -O3 -fsched2-use-superblocks -mavx512dq --param=max-pending-list-length=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65496 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/51817] [C++11] argument deduction fails when A-type parameter-type-list has additional parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51817 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug rtl-optimization/64366] Segmentation fault in remove_pseudos

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64366 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Fri Mar 20 17:43:48 2015 New Revision: 221541 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221541&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-03-20 Vladimir Makarov PR rtl-optimization/64366 *

[Bug target/65496] ICE: in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2318 with -O3 -fsched2-use-superblocks -mavx512dq --param=max-pending-list-length=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65496 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug c++/52963] Missing error on pack expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52963 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/65498] New: ICE in cxx_eval_call_expression when using __func__ inside dependent context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65498 Bug ID: 65498 Summary: ICE in cxx_eval_call_expression when using __func__ inside dependent context Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug libstdc++/65499] New: Missing "using namespace literals::chrono_literals" in std::chrono

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65499 Bug ID: 65499 Summary: Missing "using namespace literals::chrono_literals" in std::chrono Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/65498] ICE in cxx_eval_call_expression when using __func__ inside dependent context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65498 --- Comment #1 from Louis Dionne --- Apologies; the lines of the example run were wrapped and it's unreadable from here. Here's what it looks like: https://gist.github.com/ldionne/054e276caf90f16e3223

  1   2   >