[Bug bootstrap/65232] [5 Regression] bootstrap failure (ICE in change_symbol_block, at varasm.c:1230) on arm-linux-gnueabihf, in libstdc++ stage1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65232 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug plugins/65227] Plugin headers are unusable when included after inttypes.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65227 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation Status|UNCONF

[Bug libstdc++/65230] pretty-print inconsistent output for similar objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65230 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug plugins/65226] gcc-plugin.h is unusable when GCC was build with non-system or in-tree GMP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65226 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/65224] fprofile-reorder-functions reorders using expand order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65224 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug testsuite/63175] [4.9/5 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-bb-slp-9a.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2" basic block vectorized using SLP" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Feb 27 08:37:51 2015 New Revision: 221043 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221043&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-02-27 Richard Biener PR middle-end/63175 * builtins.c

[Bug testsuite/63175] [4.9/5 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-bb-slp-9a.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2" basic block vectorized using SLP" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Code quality regression fixed for trunk(?). Testcase is of course still "bogus" (wrong scan-dump, doesn't really test the code quality).

[Bug tree-optimization/65193] [4.9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with -g -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65193 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/65193] [4.9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with -g -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65193 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Feb 27 08:41:26 2015 New Revision: 221044 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221044&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-02-27 Richard Biener PR lto/65193 Backport from mainli

[Bug go/52357] 64bit-out.go and go.test/test/cmplxdivide.go time out on Solaris/SPARC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52357 Dominik Vogt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- Commen

[Bug target/65233] New: [5 Regression] ICE (segfault) on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233 Bug ID: 65233 Summary: [5 Regression] ICE (segfault) on arm-linux-gnueabihf Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug plugins/65227] Plugin headers are unusable when included after inttypes.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65227 --- Comment #4 from Bert Wesarg --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > Doumentation bug then. gcc-plugin.h should be the _only_ GCC header to > include. > So inttypes.h is considered a GCC header than? And even if GCC mandates that

[Bug target/65233] [5 Regression] ICE (segfault) on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug go/64999] s390x libgo test failure in TestMemoryProfiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64999 --- Comment #35 from Dominik Vogt --- I'd like to bring back to attention the fact that the code that deducts six from the pc (s390x) in pprof.go is broken regardless of what patches are made to the runtime code. Determining the size of the call

[Bug target/65233] [5 Regression] ICE (segfault) on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/65223] Regresion on elemental type-bound procedure's passed object with INTENT(OUT)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65223 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/57982] GetModuleHandle in __register_frame_info causes abort on unload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57982 --- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz --- The problem here is the use of weak on pe-coff. The change you see on gcc is just addressing the fact that for 64-bit the weak symbol never can get 0 due relocation-limitations. We try to address this. On the ot

[Bug target/65233] [5 Regression] ICE (segfault) on arm-linux-gnueabihf

--- Configured with: -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 5-20150227-1ubuntu11' --with-bugurl='file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-5/README.Bugs' --enable-languages=c,c++,java,go,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --program-suffix=-5 --enable-shared --en

[Bug tree-optimization/65193] [4.9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with -g -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65193 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Feb 27 10:20:50 2015 New Revision: 221050 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221050&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-02-27 Richard Biener PR lto/65193 * g++.dg/lto/pr65193

[Bug tree-optimization/65193] [4.9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with -g -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65193 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Feb 27 10:22:04 2015 New Revision: 221051 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221051&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-02-27 Richard Biener PR lto/65193 * g++.dg/lto/pr65193

[Bug testsuite/63175] [4.9/5 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-bb-slp-9a.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2" basic block vectorized using SLP" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug testsuite/63175] [4.9/5 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-bb-slp-9a.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2" basic block vectorized using SLP" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Feb 27 10:32:14 2015 New Revision: 221052 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221052&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-02-27 Richard Biener PR middle-end/63175 * builtins.c

[Bug fortran/65173] ICE while compiling wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65173 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/35330] [4.8/4.9/5 regression] ICE with invalid pragma weak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35330 --- Comment #13 from Kai Tietz --- Author: ktietz Date: Fri Feb 27 10:44:43 2015 New Revision: 221053 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221053&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-02-27 Kai Tietz PR c/35330 * c-pragma.c (handle_pragma_weak

[Bug c/35330] [4.8/4.9/5 regression] ICE with invalid pragma weak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35330 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/63790] [5 Regression] Tests XFAILed because of the match-and-simplify merge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63790 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/65233] [5 Regression] ICE (segfault) on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug fortran/61831] [4.9/ 5 Regression] runtime error: pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61831 --- Comment #43 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > The testcase passes with it, at the price of leaking memory Yes: gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_constructor_1.f90 (17 builtin_free instead of 19) and gfortran.dg/class_array_15.f03 (11 builtin_free instead

[Bug target/65233] [5 Regression] ICE (segfault) on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose --- does adding -fstack-protector-strong make a difference?

[Bug target/65233] [5 Regression] ICE (segfault) on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- No.

[Bug libfortran/65234] New: Output descriptor (*(1E15.7)) not accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65234 Bug ID: 65234 Summary: Output descriptor (*(1E15.7)) not accepted Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libfortr

[Bug libfortran/65234] Output descriptor (*(1E15.7)) not accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65234 --- Comment #1 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 34887 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34887&action=edit Testcase showing one ok, one fail

[Bug libfortran/65234] Output descriptor (*(1E15.7)) not accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65234 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/65193] [4.9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with -g -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65193 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Feb 27 11:34:14 2015 New Revision: 221054 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221054&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-02-27 Richard Biener PR lto/65193 Backport from mainli

[Bug ipa/65087] [5 Regression] r220742 causes: ICE: in ipcp_verify_propagated_values, at ipa-cp.c:1057

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65087 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug web/65231] Dead link in man page to the status of C99 features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65231 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Someone needs to add the redirect from > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.8/c99status.html to http://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html > . > Most li

[Bug libgcc/65038] [regression 5] Unable to find ftw.h for libgcov-util.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65038 --- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz --- Author: ktietz Date: Fri Feb 27 12:05:02 2015 New Revision: 221055 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221055&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/65038 * config.in: Regenerated. * configure: Likewise.

[Bug libgcc/65038] [regression 5] Unable to find ftw.h for libgcov-util.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65038 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/65228] ICE: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘error_mark’ in start_decl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65228 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Feb 27 12:18:57 2015 New Revision: 221056 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221056&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/65228 * c-decl.c (start_decl): Return NULL_TREE if decl is

[Bug c/65228] ICE: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘error_mark’ in start_decl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65228 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Feb 27 12:24:02 2015 New Revision: 221057 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221057&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/65228 * c-decl.c (start_decl): Return NULL_TREE if decl is

[Bug c/65228] ICE: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘error_mark’ in start_decl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65228 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/65235] New: [4.8, 4.9, 5 Regression] Simplifying vec_select of vec_concat miscompiles when first element of vec_concat is const_int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235 Bug ID: 65235 Summary: [4.8, 4.9, 5 Regression] Simplifying vec_select of vec_concat miscompiles when first element of vec_concat is const_int Product: gcc Versio

[Bug rtl-optimization/65235] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Simplifying vec_select of vec_concat miscompiles when first element of vec_concat is const_int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0 Summary|[4.8, 4.9, 5 Reg

[Bug libgcc/65038] [regression 5] Unable to find ftw.h for libgcov-util.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65038 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug target/43701] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV (too deep recursion) with -mno-sse and __float128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43701 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/65235] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Simplifying vec_select of vec_concat miscompiles when first element of vec_concat is const_int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|5.0 |4.8.5

[Bug c/65228] ICE: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘error_mark’ in start_decl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65228 --- Comment #8 from Jan Kratochvil --- Great, thanks.

[Bug ipa/65236] New: [5 Regression]: IPA ICF causes miscompilation in Chromium built with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65236 Bug ID: 65236 Summary: [5 Regression]: IPA ICF causes miscompilation in Chromium built with -Os Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/65236] [5 Regression]: IPA ICF causes miscompilation in Chromium built with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65236 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 34888 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34888&action=edit RTL dumps without ICF

[Bug ipa/65236] [5 Regression]: IPA ICF causes miscompilation in Chromium built with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65236 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 34889 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34889&action=edit RTL dumps with ICF

[Bug libgcc/65038] [regression 5] Unable to find ftw.h for libgcov-util.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65038 --- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz --- Author: ktietz Date: Fri Feb 27 13:19:38 2015 New Revision: 221059 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221059&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/65038 * config.in: Regenerated. * configure

[Bug libgcc/65038] [regression 5] Unable to find ftw.h for libgcov-util.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65038 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/65087] [5 Regression] r220742 causes: ICE: in ipcp_verify_propagated_values, at ipa-cp.c:1057

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65087 --- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- -fno-ipa-icf fixes the issue from comment 6.

[Bug ipa/65237] New: [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 Bug ID: 65237 Summary: [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ipa

[Bug c/65238] New: [5 Regression] __has_attribute is not handled properly with -traditional-cpp.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65238 Bug ID: 65238 Summary: [5 Regression] __has_attribute is not handled properly with -traditional-cpp. Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug ipa/64812] [4.9 regression] x86 LibreOffice Build failure: undefined reference to acquire

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64812 Michael Stahl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dtardon at redhat dot com --- Comment #9

[Bug ipa/65237] [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/64812] [4.9 regression] x86 LibreOffice Build failure: undefined reference to acquire

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64812 --- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Michael Stahl from comment #9) > interesting ... you are building LO 4.4.1.1 or older? 4.4.1.2

[Bug libstdc++/65101] cppcheck for vector.tcc: Variable '__new_finish' is reassigned a value before the old one has been used.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65101 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/65040] [5 Regression] gcc-5 -Wformat broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65040 --- Comment #19 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Feb 27 14:11:53 2015 New Revision: 221061 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221061&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/65040 * doc/invoke.texi: Update to reflect that -Wformat=

[Bug target/65032] [5 Regression] ICE in reload_combine_note_use, at postreload.c:1556 on i686-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65032 --- Comment #8 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Fri Feb 27 14:15:02 2015 New Revision: 221062 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221062&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-02-27 Vladimir Makarov PR target/65032 * lra-remat.

[Bug c/65040] [5 Regression] gcc-5 -Wformat broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65040 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/65223] Regresion on elemental type-bound procedure's passed object with INTENT(OUT)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65223 --- Comment #2 from John --- Changing the ELEMENTAL attribute to PURE produces the same error. If that's the intended behavior, then that's the same as saying type-bound procedures cannot be pure. The thread mentioned by Dominique d'Humieres see

[Bug target/65032] [5 Regression] ICE in reload_combine_note_use, at postreload.c:1556 on i686-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65032 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/65048] [5 Regression] ICE in add_phi_args_after_copy_edge, at tree-cfg.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65048 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 27 14:34:18 2015 New Revision: 221063 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221063&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/65048 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-thread-9.c: A

[Bug c/64955] RFE: have -Wformat suggest the correct format string to use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64955 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCO

[Bug c/64955] RFE: have -Wformat suggest the correct format string to use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64955 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug rtl-optimization/65220] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] integer division in stack alignment for VLA allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65220 --- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez --- Author: aldyh Date: Fri Feb 27 15:01:57 2015 New Revision: 221064 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221064&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/65220 * config/i386/i386.md (*udivmod4_pow2):

[Bug rtl-optimization/65220] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] integer division in stack alignment for VLA allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65220 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/60296] Confusing -Wformat warning on invalid format string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60296 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/65150] [5 Regression] r220875 causes bootstrap failure on x86_64 darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150 --- Comment #25 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- Bootstrap completed at r221041 on x86_64-apple-darwin14 for c,c++,fortran,lto,objc,obj-c++,java language set.

[Bug fortran/65223] Regresion on elemental type-bound procedure's passed object with INTENT(OUT)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65223 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug preprocessor/65238] [5 Regression] __has_attribute is not handled properly with -traditional-cpp.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65238 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/65237] [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth at bromo dot med

[Bug ipa/65237] [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to howarth from comment #2) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1) > > > > > On Darwin we also see: > > gcc.dg/attr-noinline.c (all cases fail) > > Didin't Martin analyze this failure as the

[Bug ipa/65237] [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- ((In reply to howarth from comment #2) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1) > > > > > On Darwin we also see: > > gcc.dg/attr-noinline.c (all cases fail) > > Didin't Martin analyze this failure as the

[Bug ipa/65237] [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > (In reply to howarth from comment #2) > > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1) > > > > > > > > On Darwin we also see: > > > gcc.dg/attr-noinline.c (all cases

[Bug ipa/65237] [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Yes, I think the test should be decoared with dg-require-alias. Well, the test used to pass.

[Bug rtl-optimization/65235] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Simplifying vec_select of vec_concat miscompiles when first element of vec_concat is const_int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug rtl-optimization/65235] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Simplifying vec_select of vec_concat miscompiles when first element of vec_concat is const_int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235 --- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #1) > Hi. The known to work field is empty. Is this a regression? > > I can't reproduce on a cross build to --target=aarch64-linux by running cc1. > Wh

[Bug rtl-optimization/65235] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Simplifying vec_select of vec_concat miscompiles when first element of vec_concat is const_int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- gah, sorry, the field is not wide enough to show the output of git blame properly...

[Bug c/39438] Can't compile a wrapper around strftime with -Werror=format-nonliteral

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39438 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCO

[Bug rtl-optimization/65235] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Simplifying vec_select of vec_concat miscompiles when first element of vec_concat is const_int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez --- --target ?? Could you post a preprocessed source code? Hmmm... fine line, but maybe this isn't a regression?

[Bug ipa/65236] [5 Regression]: IPA ICF causes miscompilation in Chromium built with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65236 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- There's generated assembly: 0045faa0 <_ZNK6google8protobuf11MessageLite24SerializePartialAsStringEv>: 45faa0:53 push %rbx 45faa1:48 89 fb mov%rd

[Bug rtl-optimization/65235] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Simplifying vec_select of vec_concat miscompiles when first element of vec_concat is const_int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235 --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 34891 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34891&action=edit Self-contained testcase Here's a testcase with the relevant parts of arm_neon.h extracted. This a

[Bug lto/65239] New: typeinfo / VTT for some classes not visibile in shared library when LTO is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65239 Bug ID: 65239 Summary: typeinfo / VTT for some classes not visibile in shared library when LTO is used Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug rtl-optimization/65235] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Simplifying vec_select of vec_concat miscompiles when first element of vec_concat is const_int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235 --- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- > Hmmm... fine line, but maybe this isn't a regression? I guess it isn't a regression in the release branches, but it is wrong-code

[Bug ipa/65237] [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug target/65240] New: [5 Regression] ICE (insn does not satisfy its constraints) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65240 Bug ID: 65240 Summary: [5 Regression] ICE (insn does not satisfy its constraints) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug middle-end/65241] New: [5 Regression] ICE (in remove_local_expressions_from_table, at tree-ssa-dom.c:1081) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65241 Bug ID: 65241 Summary: [5 Regression] ICE (in remove_local_expressions_from_table, at tree-ssa-dom.c:1081) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 5.0

[Bug ipa/65237] [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- > > FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-cp-1.c scan-ipa-dump cp "Alignment 2" > FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-cp-2.c scan-ipa-dump cp "Alignment 8, misalignment 4" Sorry, these was unintentinal commits, I will revert them soon. > FA

[Bug target/65242] New: [5 Regression] ICE (in gen_add2_insn, at optabs.c:4761) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65242 Bug ID: 65242 Summary: [5 Regression] ICE (in gen_add2_insn, at optabs.c:4761) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug lto/65243] New: [5 Regression] lto1 ICE (segfault) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65243 Bug ID: 65243 Summary: [5 Regression] lto1 ICE (segfault) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug preprocessor/65238] [5 Regression] __has_attribute is not handled properly with -traditional-cpp.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65238 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug ipa/65237] [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Fri Feb 27 16:56:57 2015 New Revision: 221065 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221065&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ipa/65237 * gcc.dg/attr-noinline.c: Add -fno-ipa-icf * gc

[Bug ipa/65237] [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka --- > > > > On Darwin we also see: > > gcc.dg/attr-noinline.c (all cases fail) > > Didin't Martin analyze this failure as the test case just needing "/* { > dg-require-alias "" } */"? > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bu

[Bug target/65242] [5 Regression] ICE (in gen_add2_insn, at optabs.c:4761) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65242 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/65244] New: Bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning with posix_memalign() and -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244 Bug ID: 65244 Summary: Bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning with posix_memalign() and -Og Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/65244] Bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning with posix_memalign() and -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244 --- Comment #1 from Ulf Magnusson --- This warning did not occur for GCC 4.8.2 (or whatever the most recent GCC version is on Ubuntu 14.04) by the way.

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

  1   2   >