[Bug tree-optimization/65216] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65216 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Feb 26 21:03:14 2015 New Revision: 221034 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221034&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/65216 * tree-ssa-reassoc.c (rewrite_expr_tree

[Bug tree-optimization/65215] [5 Regression] Bswap load miscompilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65215 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/65215] [5 Regression] Bswap load miscompilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65215 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Feb 26 21:01:59 2015 New Revision: 221033 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221033&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/65215 * tree-ssa-math-opts.c (find_bswap_or_

[Bug c/65228] ICE: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘error_mark’ in start_decl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65228 --- Comment #3 from Jan Kratochvil --- Interesting that FSF GCC r220934 which should be gcc-5.0.0-0.16.fc23.x86_64 still crashes while that Fedora GCC does not crash.

[Bug target/65138] [5 Regression] testsuite ICEs on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65138 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/65138] [5 Regression] testsuite ICEs on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65138 --- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner --- Ok, after figuring out that I was building on gcc2-power8.osuosl.org (the old big endian system that is going away), I checked out the current revision (221024) and rebuilt a tool chain on gcc2-2-power8.os

[Bug rtl-optimization/65220] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] integer division in stack alignment for VLA allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65220 --- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez --- Created attachment 34886 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34886&action=edit corrected patch I cheated and looked at test results before bootstrap. There I found that gcc.dg/torture/call

[Bug rtl-optimization/65220] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] integer division in stack alignment for VLA allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65220 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 f

[Bug libstdc++/65229] New: pretty-printer exception on std::bitset<0>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65229 Bug ID: 65229 Summary: pretty-printer exception on std::bitset<0> Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc+

[Bug libstdc++/65229] pretty-printer exception on std::bitset<0>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65229 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/65220] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] integer division in stack alignment for VLA allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65220 --- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez --- FWIW, patch succeeded as I posted it. No regressions. Fixes PR.

[Bug bootstrap/65150] [5 Regression] r220875 causes bootstrap failure on x86_64 darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150 --- Comment #22 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Fri Feb 27 02:06:48 2015 New Revision: 221040 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221040&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR bootstrap/65150 * ipa-icf.c (symbol_compare_collection::symbol

[Bug c/65120] [5 Regression] Wlogical-not-parentheses should not warn about double exclamation !!

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug libstdc++/65230] New: pretty-print inconsistent output for similar objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65230 Bug ID: 65230 Summary: pretty-print inconsistent output for similar objects Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug c/65231] New: Dead link in man page to the status of C99 features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65231 Bug ID: 65231 Summary: Dead link in man page to the status of C99 features Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug c/65231] Dead link in man page to the status of C99 features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65231 Roman Proskuryakov changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation Severity|no

[Bug web/65231] Dead link in man page to the status of C99 features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65231 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/63892] [5 Regression] gcc.dg/sibcall-3.c fails on darwin with -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63892 Bug 63892 depends on bug 65150, which changed state. Bug 65150 Summary: [5 Regression] r220875 causes bootstrap failure on x86_64 darwin https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug bootstrap/65150] [5 Regression] r220875 causes bootstrap failure on x86_64 darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/65120] [5 Regression] Wlogical-not-parentheses should not warn about double exclamation !!

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/65228] ICE: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘error_mark’ in start_decl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65228 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c/65088] Does GCC has load/store widening phase?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65088 --- Comment #3 from Marat Zakirov --- > I think this has been discussed on the gcc mailing list Marek could you please share some resuting conclusion at least for x86 platform? Why didn't x86 GCC RTL fold these loads/stores?

[Bug bootstrap/65150] [5 Regression] r220875 causes bootstrap failure on x86_64 darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150 --- Comment #24 from Jan Hubicka --- I beleive so, at least I can bootstrap w/o the aliases.

Re: [Bug target/63890] [4.9/5 regression] Compiling trivial program with -O -p leads to misaligned stack

Hi, the problem is that darwin output profiler after prologue. With ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS we leave stack pointer aligned to boundary - 4 (for return pointer) without we leave it aligned. I guess it is possible to compensate this in FUNCTION_PROFILER, but I am not convinced this will work reliabl

[Bug target/63890] [4.9/5 regression] Compiling trivial program with -O -p leads to misaligned stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890 --- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka --- Hi, the problem is that darwin output profiler after prologue. With ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS we leave stack pointer aligned to boundary - 4 (for return pointer) without we leave it aligned. I guess it is possi

[Bug ipa/64812] [4.9 regression] x86 LibreOffice Build failure: undefined reference to acquire

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64812 --- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Also happens with gcc-5 when linking two different LibreOffice libraries. (libscfiltlo.so and libooxlo.so) The undefined symbol is: x4 ~ # c++filt _ZThn40_N3utl28OSeekableOutputStreamWrapper7acquireEv

[Bug bootstrap/65232] New: [5 Regression] bootstrap failure (ICE in change_symbol_block, at varasm.c:1230) on arm-linux-gnueabihf, in libstdc++ stage1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65232 Bug ID: 65232 Summary: [5 Regression] bootstrap failure (ICE in change_symbol_block, at varasm.c:1230) on arm-linux-gnueabihf, in libstdc++ stage1 Product: gcc Ve

<    1   2