https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65200
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65130
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65177
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65112
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65130
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65171
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
The logic to avoid subregs of TImode wasn't getting executed. I have a patch
that fixes this; doing regression testing and then will get it submitted to the
list. Still working in the background on reducing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65214
Bug ID: 65214
Summary: [SH] Optimize sign/zero extensions across basic blocks
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65130
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #20)
> Created attachment 34864 [details]
> icfmerge2
>
> Updated version to apply after Jakub's patch
this bootstraps on x86_64-darwin12, and powerpc-darwin9 (at least)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65130
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ktietz at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65177
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
Last reconfirmed|2015-02-2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65209
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 25 21:46:29 2015
New Revision: 220991
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220991&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/65209
* decl2.c (constrain_visibility) [VISIBILITY_ANON]: C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65171
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt ---
Patch submitted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg01550.html.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64967
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59948
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse ---
There has been huge progress in gcc-5:
int m() ()
{
struct function h;
:
MEM[(int (*) (int) *)&h] = f;
h._M_invoker = _M_invoke;
h.D.27699._M_manager = _M_manager;
std::_Function_base::_Base_manag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65215
Bug ID: 65215
Summary: [5 Regression] Bswap load miscompilation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65215
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
5.0.0 20150225 (experimental) [trunk revision 220958] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c; a.out
$ gcc-4.9 -O3 small.c; a.out
$
$ gcc-trunk -O3 small.c
$ ./a.out
Aborted (core dumped)
$
--
int a, b = 62, e;
volatile int c;
volatile int d;
int
main ()
{
int f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65209
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65216
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65216
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
The ranges are wrong before VRP2. Reassoc2 does something suspicious...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65138
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
I just built a toolchain on gcc2-power8.osuosl.org with the configuration line:
/home/meissner/fsf-src/trunk/configure
--prefix=/home/meissner/fsf-install-ppcle64/trunk
--enable-languages=c,c++,ada,fortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65216
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64162
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65130
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez ---
FWIW, problem started with:
commit 6a0440477bc2a41ade7254552829f320755d0f0f
Author: hubicka
Date: Sat Feb 14 23:46:25 2015 +
* ipa-inline-analysis.c (growth_data): Add uninlinable field.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64162
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62255
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Feb 26 02:43:58 2015
New Revision: 220997
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220997&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/62255
* pt.c (instantiate_decl): Handle recursive instanti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65217
Bug ID: 65217
Summary: __builtin_unreachable in if statement causes bad
assembly generation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65217
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65138
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Michael Meissner from comment #3)
> I just built a toolchain on gcc2-power8.osuosl.org with the configuration
> line:
>
> /home/meissner/fsf-src/trunk/configure
> --prefix=/home/meissner/f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65065
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64394
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65171
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
BTW I get:
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/swaps-p8-2.c scan-assembler-not xxpermdi
before and after your patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65216
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64946
vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64946
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think this is really a duplicate of bug 22199.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64946
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think you should always use an unsigned type here so it will be defined in
the IR. This is mentioned in bug 22199#c3 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65067
Tony Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tony.liu at arm dot com
--- Comment #5 from T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #10 from Matthias Klose
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64946
--- Comment #6 from vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> I think you should always use an unsigned type here so it will be defined in
> the IR. This is mentioned in bug 22199#c3 .
Andrew I missed to includ
101 - 141 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
