https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64842
--- Comment #2 from simendsjo at simendsjo dot me ---
(In reply to Ville Voutilainen from comment #1)
> The constructors for Point are constexpr, but since p2 is not, passing
> it as an argument for scale() means that the invocation of scale() wil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65167
--- Comment #6 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #5)
> (In reply to Ilya Enkovich from comment #4)
>
> > + if (TARGET_MPX && BND_REGNO_P (regno))
>
> No need for TARGET_MPX check, there will be no bnd regs when this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64842
--- Comment #3 from Ville Voutilainen ---
Email sent to Bjarne.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
--- Comment #27 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #26)
> I had failed to measure peak memory use. It went down from more than 4.8G
> to less than 460M (vs 380MB without debug info). Wheee!
Wheee!
Note that this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65200
Bug ID: 65200
Summary: Handle EPERM when opening files
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65178
Leon Winter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.9.1 |5.0
--- Comment #3 from Leon Winter ---
L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65201
Bug ID: 65201
Summary: range-for range-init containing variable named like
for-range-declaration iterates over uninitialized
for-range-declaration
Product: gcc
Ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64491
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Stubbs ---
I thought of that, but my testcase has 2 exits.
I thought of only warning when all the exits were being removed, but the
loop->bounds list does not include all the exits, so that can't happen either.
I tho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64374
--- Comment #15 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14)
> So, can the reporter or anyone else still reproduce a problem in this area
> or can it be considered fixed?
last FAIL for me r219878
first PASS for me r2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48478
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #53 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The new patch I proposed has been accepted and committed upstream as r230324.
Can I cherry-pick it in GCC?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65201
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65063
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 25 10:28:01 2015
New Revision: 220960
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220960&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-02-25 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2015-02-16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63593
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 25 10:28:01 2015
New Revision: 220960
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220960&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-02-25 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2015-02-1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65202
Bug ID: 65202
Summary: [5.0 regression]ICE segfault with constexpr/noexcept
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65063
Bug 65063 depends on bug 63593, which changed state.
Bug 63593 Summary: ICE: verify_gimple failed: incompatible types in PHI
argument 0 with -O3 -fno-tree-vectorize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63593
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65063
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63593
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65203
Bug ID: 65203
Summary: Document fall-back to read-only access
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: libfort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65199
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Try marking your memcpy with __attribute__((used)).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65198
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
Summary|[4.9 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65198
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Works for me with 20150220 (r220835).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65193
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65204
Bug ID: 65204
Summary: Aligned address optimization not detected
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65204
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64641
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39947
--- Comment #7 from Kai Tietz ---
Just as note: This issue got partial addressed for 4.8 gcc for cross-compiler
version. We place bitness-version into specific lib folder for bitness.
Just for native mode - for being compatible with existing bui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65199
--- Comment #2 from Goswin von Brederlow ---
That fixes it. Isn't it a gcc bug though not to detect that itself?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65196
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Feb 25 12:18:51 2015
New Revision: 220963
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220963&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/65196
* config/avr/avr.c (avr_adjust_insn_length): Call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65196
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Feb 25 12:26:41 2015
New Revision: 220964
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220964&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/65196
* config/avr/avr.c (avr_adjust_insn_length): Call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65196
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Feb 25 12:34:21 2015
New Revision: 220965
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220965&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/65196
* config/avr/avr.c (avr_adjust_insn_length): Call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65205
Bug ID: 65205
Summary: Wrong dh-shouldfail usage in OpenACC libgomp tests
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc
Severity: major
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65196
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63608
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Feb 25 13:36:00 2015
New Revision: 220966
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220966&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-02-25 Richard Biener
Kai Tietz
PR tree-optimization/61917
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917
--- Comment #7 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Feb 25 13:42:12 2015
New Revision: 220967
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220967&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/61917
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr61917.c: New file.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Summar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51017
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64145
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65206
Bug ID: 65206
Summary: Vectorized version of loop is removed.
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimiz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65206
--- Comment #1 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
Created attachment 34867
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34867&action=edit
test-case to reproduce
Test needs to be compiled with -Ofast -m64 -mcore-avx2 options.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917
--- Comment #9 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Feb 25 14:12:46 2015
New Revision: 220968
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220968&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-02-25 Richard Biener
Kai Tietz
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64997
--- Comment #2 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: alalaw01
Date: Wed Feb 25 14:20:13 2015
New Revision: 220969
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220969&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[AArch64] Fix illegal assembly 'eon v1, v2, v3'
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53927
--- Comment #14 from Pierre-Marie de Rodat ---
Created attachment 34868
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34868&action=edit
patch to generate DWARF-compliant DW_AT_static_link attributes
gcc/
* tree-nested.c (finalize_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53927
Pierre-Marie de Rodat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||derodat at adacore dot com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65207
Bug ID: 65207
Summary: [5 regression] performance: tree level loop
optimization does not peel SpecCPU href loop
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64212
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #5)
> Well, can someone overwrite dllimport symbol by different definition?
> If not, it is a bug of decl_binds_to_current_def_p to return false here.
> If it can be inteprpo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65206
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65206
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
We apply versioning for aliasing but compute it as always aliasing in some way,
thus the runtime check gets immediately folded and thus the vectorized loop
removed:
t.c:7:3: note: create runtime check for d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65206
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
I'm talking about
(compute_affine_dependence
stmt_a: _5 = a1[i_16];
stmt_b: MASK_STORE (_34, 0B, _ifc__32, _9);
) -> dependence analysis failed
somehow it works for
(compute_affine_dependence
stmt_a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65209
Bug ID: 65209
Summary: [5.0 regression] Broken code with global static
variables, invalid pointer when freeing global
variables
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65206
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64337
guillaume.sabouret at starqube dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||guillaume.saboure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65167
--- Comment #7 from ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Wed Feb 25 15:05:48 2015
New Revision: 220970
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220970&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/65167
* gcc/config/i386/i386.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65209
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65207
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65208
Bug ID: 65208
Summary: Floats sometimes rounded up instead of being truncated
on mips
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65148
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65210
Bug ID: 65210
Summary: [avr] ICE: when using attributs 'address' and 'io_low'
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64212
--- Comment #7 from Kai Tietz ---
Tested patch posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg01502.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65148
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65210
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65198
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
--- Comment #28 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 25 15:49:34 2015
New Revision: 220974
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220974&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/58315
* decl.c (start_preparsed_function): Use create_ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65211
Bug ID: 65211
Summary: Type alignment lost inside templated function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65211
--- Comment #1 from Allan Jensen ---
Created attachment 34872
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34872&action=edit
Assembler intermediate
It is the "movdqa(%rdx), %xmm1" instruction on line 19 that is wrong.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65211
--- Comment #2 from Allan Jensen ---
Created attachment 34873
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34873&action=edit
Intermediate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65209
--- Comment #2 from Sandro Mani ---
Created attachment 34874
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34874&action=edit
Slightly reduced test case
==30483== Invalid free() / delete / delete[] / realloc()
==30483==at 0x4C2D143: op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65211
Allan Jensen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34873|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65204
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Feb 25 16:28:28 2015
New Revision: 220981
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220981&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Precommit code-change of patch by Richard Biener for gcc 6.0
2015-02-25 Ric
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65211
--- Comment #4 from Allan Jensen ---
Note either removing the template argument or moving the typedef out of the
function both solve the issue, and makes gcc use an unaligned load.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64212
--- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Feb 25 16:44:26 2015
New Revision: 220982
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220982&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64212
* symtab.c (symtab::make_decl_local): Set DECL_IMPORT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64212
--- Comment #9 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Feb 25 16:46:34 2015
New Revision: 220983
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220983&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Merged from mainline
PR target/64212
* symtab.c (symtab::make_dec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65212
Bug ID: 65212
Summary: --with-arch=nocona and -msse3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64212
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65209
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65209
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65198
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917
--- Comment #12 from Kai Tietz ---
Hmm, just retested it for gcc's trunk. Can't reproduce it. I will retest with
current trunk, I might have a different patch in tree, which makes the
difference here.
Additionally, what target you are using?
ootstrap --prefix=/usr/gcc-5.0.0
--with-local-prefix=/usr/local --enable-gnu-indirect-function --with-fpmath=sse
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20150225 (experimental) (GCC)
[hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917
--- Comment #14 from Kai Tietz ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13)
> (In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #12)
> > Hmm, just retested it for gcc's trunk. Can't reproduce it. I will retest
> > with current trunk, I might have a different p
preprocessed /tmp/x.i -quiet -dumpbase x.i -mtune=generic -march=x86-64
-auxbase x -O -version -ftree-vectorize -o x.i
GNU C (GCC) version 4.9.3 20150225 (prerelease) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.8.3 20140911 (Red Hat 4.8.3-7), GMP version
5.1.2, MPFR version 3.1.2,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I certainly can reproduce it, the problem is that reduc_def_stmt is NULL.
dt is vect_constant_def.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917
--- Comment #17 from Kai Tietz ---
Just posted a fix. For the 4.9 branch I could finally reproduce this error.
It is caused by the PHI-check for a vector-constant, which obviously has no
valid statment ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917
--- Comment #19 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Feb 25 18:21:37 2015
New Revision: 220987
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220987&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/61917
* tree-vect-loop.c (vectorizable_reductio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917
--- Comment #18 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Feb 25 18:20:34 2015
New Revision: 220986
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220986&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-02-25 Kai Tietz
PR tree-optimization/61917
* tree-vect-loop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917
--- Comment #20 from Kai Tietz ---
HJ: Does recent patch fixes issue for you too?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65148
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Fixed on trunk by r217758.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65213
Bug ID: 65213
Summary: Extend -Wmissing-declarations to variables
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65171
--- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt ---
Problem is an invalid swap removal in:
bool boost::test_tools::tt_detail::report_assertion(const
boost::test_tools::as\
sertion_result&, const boost::unit_test::lazy_ostream&,
boost::unit_test::const\
_string
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo ---
Ping. Precompiled source to reproduce the problem is still missing here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
The regression was introduced in this commit:
commit 9eec20bfd5806dd0380e07dbc0f03409ce3d4efb
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Mar 26 09:14:59 2013 +
2013-03-26 Richard Biener
* emit-rtl.c (s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833
--- Comment #5 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #4)
> Ping. Precompiled source to reproduce the problem is still missing here.
I will try to provide it in the following days. For both imagemagick and
graphi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230
--- Comment #25 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Feb 25 19:59:31 2015
New Revision: 220990
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220990&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Revert:
2014-07-26 Uros Bizjak
PR target/47230
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230
--- Comment #26 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to uros from comment #25)
The linker bug [1] was fixed in binutils 2.25 and GCC workaround was removed
for gcc 5.0.
[1] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5276
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65203
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65200
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
