https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64562
--- Comment #2 from splinterofchaos at gmail dot com ---
Attempting a work-around on this problem...
struct S {
RETURN_TYPE operator--() && {
return 1;
}
RETURN_TYPE operator--() const && {
return 2;
}
template>
RETURN_TYPE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65182
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|DUP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63427
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Mon Feb 23 23:02:50 2015
New Revision: 220921
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220921&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR fortran/63427
* wide-int.cc (wi::from_mp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65153
--- Comment #13 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Mon Feb 23 23:24:59 2015
New Revision: 220922
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220922&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/65153
[SH] Fix PR target/65153 with removing movsicc_true+3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka ---
The functions ought to be equivalent, so transfering just some users should not
cause correctness issues. Of course unless the function is turned into a thunk
and/or the rest of references are optimized out, w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65182
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Tue Feb 24 00:00:59 2015
New Revision: 220924
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220924&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/65182
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (get_memref_parts): Only re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65172
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65182
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Maciej W. Rozycki from comment #5)
It doesn't look like things have changed since 4.9.0. I just posted my
analysis to the list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg01401.html
from Alan Modra ---
I couldn't reproduce this using svn llvm rev 230301, gcc-5 20150223, and
binutils 2.25.51.20150223. I was building on a power7 box (because that's
where I happened to have my latest gcc build), so used -mcpu=power7
-mno-strict-align. That ought to trigger the same block
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
--- Comment #18 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 34852
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34852&action=edit
reduced and indented testcase
Memory explosion occurs while compiling test03() function. Memory usage before
|--- |MOVED
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #2)
> I couldn't reproduce this using svn llvm rev 230301, gcc-5 20150223, and
> binutils 2.25.51.20150223. I was building on a power7 box (because that's
> where I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65186
Bug ID: 65186
Summary: internal compiler error: in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:11738
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65169
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65126
--- Comment #9 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Feb 24 06:55:51 2015
New Revision: 220929
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220929&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add additional_sources_used
2015-02-24 Tom de Vries
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65126
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64796
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fix was committed. marking resolved, fixed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64796
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
101 - 118 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
