[Bug c/65066] New: [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with -Wformat=2

2015-02-15 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65066 Bug ID: 65066 Summary: [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with -Wformat=2 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug rtl-optimization/65067] New: regression on accessing volatile bit field

2015-02-15 Thread terry.guo at arm dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65067 Bug ID: 65067 Summary: regression on accessing volatile bit field Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optim

[Bug libgcc/61309] cilk-plus tests fail with: hidden symbol `__cpu_model' in /x/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../libgcc.a(cpuinfo.o) is referenced by DSO

2015-02-15 Thread gnugcc at marino dot st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61309 --- Comment #5 from John Marino --- hmmm, I added t-freebsd to the tmake list in libgcc/config.host for dragonfly. I thought it would fix the problem but I'm still seeing hidden symbol errors for __cpu_model

[Bug tree-optimization/65068] New: Improve rewriting for address type induction variables in IVOPT

2015-02-15 Thread amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65068 Bug ID: 65068 Summary: Improve rewriting for address type induction variables in IVOPT Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug target/65069] New: [SH] Calculate constants

2015-02-15 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65069 Bug ID: 65069 Summary: [SH] Calculate constants Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee:

[Bug target/64793] [SH] missed delay slot

2015-02-15 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64793 --- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo --- Thanks! If I'm not mistaken, it looks like there's an overall improvement of ~0.35%. I think I'll go with it.

[Bug fortran/60898] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9

2015-02-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898 --- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > patch fixing comment #7 This patch breaks bootstrap: /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=FC --mode=compile /opt/gcc/p_build/./gcc/gfortran -B/opt/gcc/p_build/./gcc/ -B/opt/gcc/gcc4.10p-220715p2/x86_64-apple

[Bug c++/59845] loop optimization problem when profiling

2015-02-15 Thread arshamidi at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59845 ArshaGCC changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgomp/65070] New: libgomp calls syscall instruction directly

2015-02-15 Thread nyh at math dot technion.ac.il
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65070 Bug ID: 65070 Summary: libgomp calls syscall instruction directly Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgom

[Bug c/65066] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with -Wformat=2

2015-02-15 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65066 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/64980] [5 Regression] ICE in trans-expr.c

2015-02-15 Thread bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64980 --- Comment #16 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #14) > Bernd, do you have a reliable way to test a patch, checking for aliasing > violations? No, all I can do is run the test suite on my armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueab

[Bug target/65064] [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr60115.c -O1 (test for excess errors)

2015-02-15 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65064 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Component|rtl-optimization

[Bug target/65064] [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr60115.c -O1 (test for excess errors)

2015-02-15 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65064 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #34759|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/53623] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] sign extension is effectively split into two x86-64 instructions

2015-02-15 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53623 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||brian at soulspark dot org --- Comment #11 fro

[Bug target/64941] -O3 breaks tar

2015-02-15 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64941 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/65064] [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr60115.c -O1 (test for excess errors)

2015-02-15 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65064 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab --- This works as well.

[Bug middle-end/53623] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] sign extension is effectively split into two x86-64 instructions

2015-02-15 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53623 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Known to work|

[Bug fortran/60526] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Accepts-invalid: Variable name same as type name

2015-02-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60526 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug target/65064] [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr60115.c -O1 (test for excess errors)

2015-02-15 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65064 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- A patch is posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00913.html

[Bug fortran/65024] [4.9/5 Regression] [OOP] ICE concerning unlimited polymorphic pointer

2015-02-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65024 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug c++/65071] New: ICE on valid, sizeof...() of template template parameter pack in return type

2015-02-15 Thread maltsevm at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65071 Bug ID: 65071 Summary: ICE on valid, sizeof...() of template template parameter pack in return type Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug libgomp/65070] libgomp calls syscall instruction directly

2015-02-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65070 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- It is intentionally written that way. Why would you want to use linux specific code on an OS that isn't linux?

[Bug fortran/59765] [4.9/5 Regression] [OOP] ICE on valid with finalizable array components

2015-02-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59765 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/37336] [F03] Finish derived-type finalization

2015-02-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336 Bug 37336 depends on bug 59765, which changed state. Bug 59765 Summary: [4.9/5 Regression] [OOP] ICE on valid with finalizable array components https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59765 What|Removed |A

[Bug middle-end/53623] [4.7/4.8 Regression] sign extension is effectively split into two x86-64 instructions

2015-02-15 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53623 --- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12) > This regression is only fixed in 4.9 and should be backported to 4.8 > branch. Unfortunately, r206418 introduced many regressions. Backport r206418 requires backporting a

[Bug ada/64866] Lost visibility of package Interfaces after task or PO declaration

2015-02-15 Thread simon at pushface dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64866 --- Comment #1 from simon at pushface dot org --- This bug appears to be triggered because the RTS contains freertos.ads with private with Interfaces; package FreeRTOS with Pure is ... s-taprob.ads and s-tposen.ads start with pri

[Bug ada/64548] Lost visibility of package System after raise

2015-02-15 Thread simon at pushface dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64548 --- Comment #2 from simon at pushface dot org --- See PR64866 for a similar problem/workround.

[Bug ada/64866] Lost visibility of package Interfaces after task or PO declaration

2015-02-15 Thread charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64866 Arnaud Charlet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/64596] Friendship not recognized and template param deduction error

2015-02-15 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64596 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug ada/64548] Lost visibility of package System after raise

2015-02-15 Thread charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64548 Arnaud Charlet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/37336] [F03] Finish derived-type finalization

2015-02-15 Thread sourcery at rouson dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336 --- Comment #29 from sourcery at rouson dot net --- Good news. Hopefully you saw the email about the tutorial proposals. Strangely ISC asks for "1/2 page" CVs, which I interpret as half-page CVs (Karla was hoping they meant 1-2 page, but I think

[Bug libgomp/65070] libgomp calls syscall instruction directly

2015-02-15 Thread nyh at math dot technion.ac.il
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65070 --- Comment #2 from Nadav Har'El --- Hi, What was the intention behind this "intentionally"? As I mentioned above, I believe the tiny performance saving of not calling the syscall() function are minimal, because if I understand correctly it's on

[Bug middle-end/53623] [4.7/4.8 Regression] sign extension is effectively split into two x86-64 instructions

2015-02-15 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53623 --- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 34767 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34767&action=edit A backport patch for 4.8 branch I am testing this patch now.

[Bug ada/64866] Lost visibility of package Interfaces after task or PO declaration

2015-02-15 Thread simon at pushface dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64866 --- Comment #3 from simon at pushface dot org --- Created attachment 34768 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34768&action=edit Revised demonstrator FreeRTOS packages moved under System, per Arno’s recommendation. Still fails.

[Bug ada/64866] Lost visibility of package Interfaces after task or PO declaration

2015-02-15 Thread simon at pushface dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64866 --- Comment #4 from simon at pushface dot org --- (In reply to Arnaud Charlet from comment #2) > Visibility in the Ada runtime do not follow standard Ada rules. In other > words, > the Ada runtime isn't implemented in Ada, but in a different diale

[Bug ada/64548] Lost visibility of package System after raise

2015-02-15 Thread simon at pushface dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64548 --- Comment #4 from simon at pushface dot org --- (In reply to Arnaud Charlet from comment #3) > I would suggest you do not use 'private with' if you write your own runtime, > since this isn't supported by the compiler when building the runtime. >

[Bug ipa/65059] [5 Regression] Chrome LTO: lto1: internal compiler error: in ipa_comdats, at ipa-comdats.c:360

2015-02-15 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65059 --- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka --- Does the following help? Index: ipa-comdats.c === --- ipa-comdats.c (revision 220606) +++ ipa-comdats.c (working copy) @@ -328,9 +328,

[Bug c++/65072] New: Segfault when parsing dectlype in trailing return type

2015-02-15 Thread uroc327 at cssbook dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65072 Bug ID: 65072 Summary: Segfault when parsing dectlype in trailing return type Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug c++/65072] Segfault when parsing dectlype in trailing return type

2015-02-15 Thread uroc327 at cssbook dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65072 uroc327 at cssbook dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uroc327 at cssbook dot de ---

[Bug ipa/65059] [5 Regression] Chrome LTO: lto1: internal compiler error: in ipa_comdats, at ipa-comdats.c:360

2015-02-15 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65059 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Thank you Honza, patch works for. Martin

[Bug c++/65072] Segfault when parsing dectlype in trailing return type

2015-02-15 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65072 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Target|Archlinux Kernel 3.16.3,| |Intel x86_64

[Bug middle-end/53623] [4.7/4.8 Regression] sign extension is effectively split into two x86-64 instructions

2015-02-15 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53623 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW --- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu --- A patch

[Bug fortran/65073] New: dynamic character assignment gives wrong result

2015-02-15 Thread walt.brainerd at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65073 Bug ID: 65073 Summary: dynamic character assignment gives wrong result Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: f

[Bug c/64833] [SH]: Error: pcrel too far when compiling imagemagick and graphicsmagick on Debian sh4

2015-02-15 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Target||sh*-*-* CC|

[Bug target/64833] [SH]: Error: pcrel too far when compiling imagemagick and graphicsmagick on Debian sh4

2015-02-15 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833 --- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo --- Would it be possible for you to pull a precompiled source from the build via the '-save-temps' option?

[Bug middle-end/65074] New: [5 Regression] r220674 broke C++ PIEs

2015-02-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65074 Bug ID: 65074 Summary: [5 Regression] r220674 broke C++ PIEs Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug middle-end/65074] [5 Regression] r220674 broke C++ PIEs

2015-02-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65074 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug target/64833] [SH]: Error: pcrel too far when compiling imagemagick and graphicsmagick on Debian sh4

2015-02-15 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833 --- Comment #3 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- Hi Oleg! Yes, I will simply run a manual build in the following days and just make sure nothing is thrown away. I finally have my very own SH4 board now and I will set it up in the upcoming week.

[Bug fortran/65073] dynamic character assignment gives wrong result

2015-02-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65073 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/65024] [4.9/5 Regression] [OOP] ICE concerning unlimited polymorphic pointer

2015-02-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65024 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > The ICE for the reduced test in comment 2 appeared between revisions > r207428 (2014-02-03, OK) and r207996 (2014-02-21, ICE). Started at r207986.

[Bug middle-end/65074] [5 Regression] r220674 broke C++ PIEs

2015-02-15 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65074 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 34770 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34770&action=edit A patch Please try this.

[Bug tree-optimization/64992] More optimize opportunity

2015-02-15 Thread ishiura-compiler at ml dot kwansei.ac.jp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64992 --- Comment #4 from Ishiura Lab Compiler Team --- FYI, clang-3.6 -O3 seems to do the same optimization on "org.c" as well as on "opt.c."

[Bug middle-end/51017] GCC 4.6 performance regression (vs. 4.4/4.5)

2015-02-15 Thread solar-gcc at openwall dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51017 --- Comment #9 from Alexander Peslyak --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8) > Can you try GCC 4.9? Yes. Bad news: things mostly became even worse. Same machine, same JtR version, same test script as in my previous comment: 4.9.2 - 1

[Bug tree-optimization/64992] More optimize opportunity

2015-02-15 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64992 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse --- W

[Bug c++/65075] New: [5 Regression] constexpr regression

2015-02-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65075 Bug ID: 65075 Summary: [5 Regression] constexpr regression Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ A

[Bug c++/65075] [5 Regression] constexpr regression

2015-02-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65075 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/64821] [AArch64] Improve target folding for vsqrt_f64 intrinsic

2015-02-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64821 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/51017] GCC 4.6 performance regression (vs. 4.4/4.5)

2015-02-15 Thread solar-gcc at openwall dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51017 --- Comment #10 from Alexander Peslyak --- I decided to take a look at the generated code. Compared to 4.6.2, GCC 4.9.2 started generating lots of xorps, orps, andps, andnps where it previously generated pxor, por, pand, pandn. Changing those w

[Bug fortran/64432] [5 Regression] SYSTEM_CLOCK(COUNT_RATE=rate) wrong result for integer(4)::rate

2015-02-15 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64432 --- Comment #18 from Jerry DeLisle --- Created attachment 34771 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34771&action=edit A test case Current results with attached test case. $ ./a.out KIND=1: 34 1 127 KIND=1: 34 1. 12

[Bug c++/65071] ICE on valid, sizeof...() of template template parameter pack in return type

2015-02-15 Thread maltsevm at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65071 --- Comment #1 from Mikhail Maltsev --- A few more comments. I wrote that GCC 5.0 segfaults. That's actually not true, I could not reproduce segfault on checked builds (only release version of 4.9.2), but never the less it's still ICE. So, here

[Bug target/55701] Inline some instances of memset for ARM

2015-02-15 Thread amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55701 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug regression/61538] gcc after commit 39a8c5ea produces bad code for MIPS R1x000 CPUs

2015-02-15 Thread kumba at gentoo dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61538 Joshua Kinard changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.8.0 |4.9.3 Known to fail|

[Bug fortran/64980] [5 Regression] ICE in trans-expr.c

2015-02-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64980 --- Comment #17 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I think this updated patch fixes all mentioned test cases. Confirmed, bootstrapped and regtested cleanly. > but there are many regressions, which would need to be fixed before > it makes sense to

[Bug fortran/64980] [5 Regression] ICE in trans-expr.c

2015-02-15 Thread bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64980 --- Comment #18 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #17) > > I think this updated patch fixes all mentioned test cases. > > Confirmed, bootstrapped and regtested cleanly. > > > but there are many regressions,