[Bug ipa/65008] [5 Regression] ICE: in estimate_edge_growth, at ipa-inline.h:298 with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65008 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/62249] Spurious FORTIFY_SOURCE warning with -flto, poll

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62249 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/61886] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] LTO breaks fread with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zackw at panix dot com --- Comment #29

[Bug lto/61886] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] LTO breaks fread with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886 --- Comment #30 from Richard Biener --- So, do we really want to go without this fixed again, for GCC 5? Honza? After all this is an underlying wrong-code issue! (wrong function is picked as prevailing)

[Bug sanitizer/65000] ICE in in expand_builtin_eh_common, at except.c:2072

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65000 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- The patch (without the unrelated? c-typeck.c bits) passed bootstrap/regtest on {x86_64,i686,ppc64,ppc64le,s390,s390x,aarch64}-linux.

[Bug ipa/65005] [5 Regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/builtin-arith-overflow-12.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65005 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Wed Feb 11 09:11:06 2015 New Revision: 220608 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220608&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ipa/65005 * ipa-visibility.c (cgraph_node::non_local_p): Turn i

[Bug lto/61886] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] LTO breaks fread with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886 --- Comment #31 from Jan Hubicka --- > So, do we really want to go without this fixed again, for GCC 5? Honza? > After > all this is an underlying wrong-code issue! (wrong function is picked as > prevailing) Well, I have only two hands and d

[Bug c++/65009] [4.9 Regression] g++ 4.9 sometimes leaves inline methods undefined when compiling with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65009 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/64577] No -Wpadded warning on padding bitfields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64577 --- Comment #2 from Chengnian Sun --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1) > -Wpadded is implemented in stor-layout.c, so moving to middle-end component. Hi Marek, Is this bug confirmed? Thanks.

[Bug lto/65012] [5 Regression] systemd fails to build at least on ppc64el, powerpc, arm-inux-gnueabihf and aarch64 with -flto (ICE)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65012 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug middle-end/64824] ICE in gimple verification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64824 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/64824] ICE in gimple verification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64824 --- Comment #4 from David Binderman --- The attached code fails on trunk dated 20150211 ../kpx_cpu/src/cpu/jit/basic-dyngen-ops.cpp:166:6: error: type mismatch in shift expression DEFINE_OP(rol_32_T0_im, T0 = do_rol_32(T0, PARAM1

[Bug c++/65009] [4.9 Regression] g++ 4.9 sometimes leaves inline methods undefined when compiling with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65009 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug ipa/65008] [5 Regression] ICE: in estimate_edge_growth, at ipa-inline.h:298 with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65008 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug web/65007] __builtin_uaddll_overflow wrong *res declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65007 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation Status|UNCONF

[Bug ipa/65006] [5 Regression] 252.eon in SPEC CPU 2000 miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65006 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug ipa/65005] [5 Regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/builtin-arith-overflow-12.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65005 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug middle-end/64577] No -Wpadded warning on padding bitfields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64577 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/65013] New: [API] std::deque is missing constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65013 Bug ID: 65013 Summary: [API] std::deque is missing constructors Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug middle-end/64824] ICE in gimple verification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64824 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- What does #c3 have to do with this? I don't see any OpenMP pragmas in your code, therefore it can't be related to this. File a new PR?

[Bug target/61925] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] internal error when using vectorization on CPU without SSE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61925 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Feb 11 10:04:14 2015 New Revision: 220609 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220609&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/61925 * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_reset_to_default_global

[Bug lto/61886] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] LTO breaks fread with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886 --- Comment #32 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 11 Feb 2015, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886 > > --- Comment #31 from Jan Hubicka --- > > So, do we really want to go without this fixe

[Bug lto/61886] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] LTO breaks fread with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886 --- Comment #33 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 11 Feb 2015, Richard Biener wrote: > On Wed, 11 Feb 2015, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886 > > > > --- Comment #31 from Jan Hubicka

[Bug c++/65014] New: ice with error: type mismatch in shift expression

: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com Created attachment 34721 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34721&action=edit C++ source code The attached code does the following with trunk dated 20150211 $ ../results/

[Bug middle-end/64824] ICE in gimple verification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64824 --- Comment #6 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > What does #c3 have to do with this? Same ice, so I guessed same problem. >I don't see any OpenMP pragmas in your code, therefore it can't be related to >>t

[Bug lto/65015] New: LTO produces randomly ordered debug information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65015 Bug ID: 65015 Summary: LTO produces randomly ordered debug information Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: l

[Bug target/61925] [4.8/4.9 Regression] internal error when using vectorization on CPU without SSE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61925 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.8/4.9/5 Regression] |[4.8/4.9 Regression] |

[Bug target/64893] [5 Regression] ICE while doing a bootstrap with the latest compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64893 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- Author: pinskia Date: Wed Feb 11 10:18:45 2015 New Revision: 220610 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220610&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix bug 64893: ICE with vget_lane_u32 with C++ front-end 2015-02-11 A

[Bug lto/65016] New: [5 Regression] r220608 causes Firefox LTO build failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65016 Bug ID: 65016 Summary: [5 Regression] r220608 causes Firefox LTO build failure Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug target/64893] [5 Regression] ICE while doing a bootstrap with the latest compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64893 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/57653] [4.8/4.9 Regression] filename information discarded when using -imacros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57653 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug c/57653] [4.8/4.9 Regression] filename information discarded when using -imacros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57653 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/64342] [5 Regression] Tests failing when compiled with '-m32 -fpic' after r216154.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64342 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > avx512f-kandnw-1.c and funcspec-5.c seem to be non-PIC related issues. > I asked Kirill to look at them. At r220588 avx512f-kandnw-1.c is still failing. AFAICT it is a problem with the regexp. I al

[Bug c++/65017] New: valgrind error in get_constraint_for_address_of

++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com Created attachment 34722 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34722&action=edit C++ source code Given the C++ source code from bug # 47903, compiled by trunk of 20150211 with f

[Bug tree-optimization/64590] Firefox 34 triggers GCC AVX bug (segfault: XPCCallContext::GetJSContext (this=0xfffc7fffe3e23980))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64590 --- Comment #13 from Dâniel Fraga --- (In reply to David Baron from comment #12) > The correct changeset that fixed the problem is: > https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/3023f9390942 Yes, thanks! :)

[Bug libstdc++/60621] std::vector::emplace_back generates massively more code than push_back

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60621 --- Comment #3 from marc at kdab dot com --- Now, what is _really_ weird is that push_back(T&&) _calls_ emplace_back(). I also tried the magic incantation g++ --param large-unit-insns=1 \ --param inline-unit-growth=1 \

[Bug libstdc++/60621] std::vector::emplace_back generates massively more code than push_back

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60621 marc at kdab dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #32429|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/65017] valgrind error in get_constraint_for_address_of

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65017 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/65016] [5 Regression] r220608 causes Firefox LTO build failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65016 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug libstdc++/65018] New: Use secure_getenv when available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65018 Bug ID: 65018 Summary: Use secure_getenv when available Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug tree-optimization/65002] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65002 --- Comment #6 from Ilya Enkovich --- Is this actually an ICE on valid code? 'const' attribute seems incorrect here similar to what we had in PR64353. The problem comes from SSA inconsistency caused by the wrong attribute. Probably just ignore

[Bug target/64342] [5 Regression] Tests failing when compiled with '-m32 -fpic' after r216154.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64342 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > At r220588 avx512f-kandnw-1.c is still failing. AFAICT it is a problem > with the regexp. > I also see a similar failure with avx512f-gather-5.c. [Book15] f90/bug% egrep "kandnw[^\{\n]*%k[0-7]" avx

[Bug lto/65015] LTO produces randomly ordered debug information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65015 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/65015] LTO produces randomly ordered debug information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65015 --- Comment #2 from conchur at web dot de --- Created attachment 34724 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34724&action=edit Mini Testcases Current results (the -COMPILE things are just out of curiosity): SIMPLE-COMPILE: OK SIMP

[Bug libstdc++/65013] [API] std::deque is missing constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65013 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/65015] LTO produces randomly ordered debug information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65015 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Feb 11 12:00:44 2015 New Revision: 220613 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220613&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-02-11 Richard Biener PR lto/65015 * dwarf2out.c (gen_p

[Bug c/57653] [4.8/4.9 Regression] filename information discarded when using -imacros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57653 --- Comment #25 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Feb 11 12:14:07 2015 New Revision: 220614 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220614&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-02-11 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2014-07-2

[Bug c/57653] [4.8/4.9 Regression] filename information discarded when using -imacros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57653 --- Comment #26 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Feb 11 12:14:54 2015 New Revision: 220615 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220615&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-02-11 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2014-07-2

[Bug c/57653] [4.8/4.9 Regression] filename information discarded when using -imacros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57653 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug lto/65015] LTO produces randomly ordered debug information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65015 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to conchur from comment #2) > Created attachment 34724 [details] > Mini Testcases > > Current results (the -COMPILE things are just out of curiosity): > > SIMPLE-COMPILE: OK > SIMPLE-LINK: OK > L

[Bug libstdc++/65018] Use secure_getenv when available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65018 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/65002] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65002 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Sure, the __attribute__((const)) looks very much wrong to me, as it returns what the reference points, it necessarily reads memory and therefore is at most pure, but certainly not const. But, we must not ICE

[Bug lto/64837] lto plugin doesn't call ld_plugin_release_input_file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 34725 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34725&action=edit A patch

[Bug lto/64837] lto plugin doesn't call ld_plugin_release_input_file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu --- (In repl

[Bug sanitizer/65019] New: Compare debug failure with -fsanitize=alignment,object-size,vptr -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65019 Bug ID: 65019 Summary: Compare debug failure with -fsanitize=alignment,object-size,vptr -O3 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/65019] Compare debug failure with -fsanitize=alignment,object-size,vptr -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65019 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus --- Note that the "final" is required - if one leaves it out, it succeeds.

[Bug lto/64837] lto plugin doesn't call ld_plugin_release_input_file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #34725|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug lto/64837] lto plugin doesn't call ld_plugin_release_input_file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug tree-optimization/65014] [5 Regression] ice with error: type mismatch in shift expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65014 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Component|c++

[Bug c++/65014] ice with error: type mismatch in shift expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65014 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/65020] New: [5.0 regression] bootstrap failed on arm because of r219789

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65020 Bug ID: 65020 Summary: [5.0 regression] bootstrap failed on arm because of r219789 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug c++/65017] valgrind error in get_constraint_for_address_of

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65017 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- I can't reproduce this - how did you compile/configure GCC? Just tried both --enable-checking and --enable-checking=release builds.

[Bug c++/65017] valgrind error in get_constraint_for_address_of

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65017 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > I can't reproduce this - how did you compile/configure GCC? Just tried both > --enable-checking and --enable-checking=release builds. ../src/trunk/configure

[Bug target/29849] sh-linux uses inefficient multilib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29849 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/29842] [meta-bug] outstanding patches / issues from STMicroelectronics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29842 Bug 29842 depends on bug 29849, which changed state. Bug 29849 Summary: sh-linux uses inefficient multilib https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29849 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug ipa/64813] [5 Regression] 23_containers/unordered_map/requirements/explicit_instantiation/[2,4].cc iCEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813 --- Comment #21 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Wed Feb 11 13:33:47 2015 New Revision: 220616 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220616&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Handle noreturn function thunk creation. PR ipa/64813 * cgraphun

[Bug c++/65017] valgrind error in get_constraint_for_address_of

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65017 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 11 Feb 2015, dcb314 at hotmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65017 > > --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment

[Bug tree-optimization/65014] [5 Regression] ice with error: type mismatch in shift expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65014 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug middle-end/64824] ICE in gimple verification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64824 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Feb 11 13:40:31 2015 New Revision: 220617 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220617&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/64824 * c-parser.c (c_parser_binary_expression): Fix OpenMP s

[Bug fortran/57822] I/O: "(g0)" wrongly prints "E+0000"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57822 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I am afraid that the test will fail on targets without REAL(10). see https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00698.html and e.g., https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-02/msg01269.html.

[Bug ipa/64813] [5 Regression] 23_containers/unordered_map/requirements/explicit_instantiation/[2,4].cc iCEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/65014] [5 Regression] ice with error: type mismatch in shift expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65014 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug gcov-profile/64123] [5 Regression] Instrumented Firefox segfaults on start

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64123 --- Comment #28 from Richard Biener --- Similar issue happens when building python with profile feedback enabled, that is, ./configure; make profile-opt as implemented in python upstream. Core file tells me (gdb) bt #0 0x7f890ef2616a in _I

[Bug fortran/64474] [4.8 Regression] transfer(c_null_ptr, ...) causes an internal error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64474 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/65020] [5.0 regression] bootstrap failed on arm because of r219789

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65020 --- Comment #1 from Maxim Kuvyrkov --- Do you have 770c9167327b3c20b718dae5062d57a052316a78 / 220316 applied? That patch is not a complete fix (see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935), but it fixes the bootstrap problem.

[Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968 --- Comment #4 from Frédéric Buclin --- Bugzilla 5.0 is not available from bzr, it requires git. But there is already a .git repository in the root bugzilla/ directory, which requires root permissions to be read. What is git used for currently?

[Bug rtl-optimization/65020] [5.0 regression] bootstrap failed on arm because of r219789

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65020 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm Component|c

[Bug tree-optimization/65014] [5 Regression] ice with error: type mismatch in shift expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65014 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug fortran/64927] [4.8 Regression] Surprising error with -Wsurprising (-Wall) and TRANSFER + C_ASSOCIATED

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64927 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/64868] C front-end rejects valid syntax.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64868 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Feb 11 14:44:10 2015 New Revision: 220622 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220622&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2015-02-04 Jakub Jelinek PR c/648

[Bug middle-end/64824] ICE in gimple verification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64824 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Feb 11 14:44:10 2015 New Revision: 220622 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220622&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2015-02-04 Jakub Jelinek PR c/648

[Bug target/64979] [4.8/4.9 Regression] stdarg optimization not able to find escape sites in phi nodes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64979 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Feb 11 14:45:26 2015 New Revision: 220623 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220623&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2015-02-09 Jakub Jelinek PR targe

[Bug rtl-optimization/65020] [5.0 regression] bootstrap failed on arm because of r219789

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65020 --- Comment #2 from Jiong Wang --- (In reply to Maxim Kuvyrkov from comment #1) > Do you have 770c9167327b3c20b718dae5062d57a052316a78 / 220316 applied? > > That patch is not a complete fix (see > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=649

[Bug fortran/60718] [4.8/4.9 regression] Test case gfortran.dg/select_type_4.f90 fails on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60718 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #23 from Domi

[Bug middle-end/64824] ICE in gimple verification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64824 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Feb 11 14:48:41 2015 New Revision: 220624 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220624&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/64824 * c-parser.c (c_parser_binary_expression): Fix OpenMP s

[Bug fortran/60718] [4.8/4.9 regression] Test case gfortran.dg/select_type_4.f90 fails on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60718 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/65017] valgrind error in get_constraint_for_address_of

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65017 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #5 from Richard Bie

[Bug middle-end/65003] [5 Regression] -fsection-anchors ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65003 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Feb 11 15:09:48 2015 New Revision: 220625 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220625&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/65003 * varasm.c (place_block_symbol): Assert that D

[Bug middle-end/65003] [5 Regression] -fsection-anchors ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65003 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/65021] New: nvptx mkoffload doesn't clean up its temporary files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65021 Bug ID: 65021 Summary: nvptx mkoffload doesn't clean up its temporary files Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openacc, openmp Severity: major

[Bug lto/64837] lto plugin doesn't call ld_plugin_release_input_file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837 --- Comment #14 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Well, at least your patch survives a Firefox LTO build using gold on a ppc64 test machine.

[Bug lto/64837] lto plugin doesn't call ld_plugin_release_input_file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837 --- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #14) > Well, at least your patch survives a Firefox LTO build using gold > on a ppc64 test machine. Does it build without my patch?

[Bug lto/64837] lto plugin doesn't call ld_plugin_release_input_file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837 --- Comment #16 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #15) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #14) > > Well, at least your patch survives a Firefox LTO build using gold > > on a ppc64 test machine. > > Does

[Bug lto/64837] lto plugin doesn't call ld_plugin_release_input_file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837 --- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #16) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #15) > > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #14) > > > Well, at least your patch survives a Firefox LTO build using

[Bug lto/64837] lto plugin doesn't call ld_plugin_release_input_file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837 --- Comment #18 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #17) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #16) > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #15) > > > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #14) > > > > W

[Bug libgomp/64972] Build failure in libgomp for i686-w64-mingw32 target after latest merge from gomp-4_0-branch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64972 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/65019] Compare debug failure with -fsanitize=alignment,object-size,vptr -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65019 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/64835] -fno-ipa-cp is inconsitently supported when attributes optimize or target are used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64835 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968 --- Comment #5 from Frank Ch. Eigler --- The current .git repos are there as a backup. I'll move them out of the way.

[Bug sanitizer/65019] [5 Regression] Compare debug failure with -fsanitize=alignment,object-size,vptr -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65019 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0 Summary|Compare debug fai

  1   2   >