https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64269
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Shorter testcase:
void
foo (char *p)
{
__SIZE_TYPE__ s = ~(__SIZE_TYPE__)0;
*p = 0;
__builtin_memset (p + 1, 0, s);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64269
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64279
Bug ID: 64279
Summary: Warning missing for "(cond) ? A : A" / if(cond) expr1;
else expr1; // same expression in if and else branch
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64262
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64255
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63917
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64255
Bug 64255 depends on bug 63917, which changed state.
Bug 63917 Summary: [5 Regression] r217646 caused many failures
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63917
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64261
--- Comment #2 from Eugene ---
-Wall -pedantic -Os -g -std=c++0x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64246
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|rguenth at g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64278
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64277
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64274
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> Does the following fix it?
>
> diff --git a/gcc/fold-const.c b/gcc/fold-const.c
> index 7b68bea..34f5a6b 100644
> --- a/gcc/fold-const.c
> +++ b/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64274
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64280
Bug ID: 64280
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE in replace_uses_by, at
tree-cfg.c:1789
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64280
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64281
Bug ID: 64281
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64281
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64280
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64282
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64282
Bug ID: 64282
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE in
gimple_get_virt_method_for_vtable, at
gimple-fold.c:5635
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64283
Bug ID: 64283
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE: in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:939
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64283
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64281
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61558
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64282
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63569
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64283
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60784
--- Comment #7 from Peter Wu ---
This bug is still present in GCC 4.9.2 and 4.9.3 (prerelease 20141210). Now
building gcc-5-20141207 to verify. (Not sure whether this gets backported to
4.9.x, just checking.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64280
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58796
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64282
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
reduced test case:
template struct A
{
_T1 first;
};
struct B
{
int operator!=(B);
};
template struct C
{
C (B);
_Tp operator*();
int operator!=(C);
};
template class D
{
public:
typedef
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64284
Bug ID: 64284
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimiz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64284
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64139
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64285
Bug ID: 64285
Summary: [5 Regression] During LTO: ICE segfault in
ipa_polymorphic_call_context::get_dynamic_type
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
K
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64284
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64284
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
trippels@gcc20 ~ % cat scp.i
int *a;
int b;
int
fn1() {
enum { QSTRING } c = 0;
while (1) {
switch (*a) {
case '\'':
c = 0;
default:
switch (c)
case 0:
if (b)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64276
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64284
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Sth like
Index: tree-ssa-threadupdate.c
===
--- tree-ssa-threadupdate.c (revision 218621)
+++ tree-ssa-threadupdate.c (working copy)
@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64285
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60784
--- Comment #8 from Peter Wu ---
GCC 5 is OK, the question is whether 4.9 will or will not receive a fix?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64255
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 12 12:43:34 2014
New Revision: 218665
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218665&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/64255
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr64255.c: New
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64260
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 12 12:43:34 2014
New Revision: 218665
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218665&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/64255
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr64255.c: New t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64286
Bug ID: 64286
Summary: Redundant extend removal ignores vector element type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64280
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64280
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Dec 12 13:26:15 2014
New Revision: 218668
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218668&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-12-12 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/64280
* tree-cfg.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61558
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
This triggers a _lot_ when re-building openSUSE with GCC 5. And it is
especially
annoying because "Segmentation fault" isn't a nice ICE to filter.
Please fix this bug soon.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64265
--- Comment #1 from Bernd Edlinger ---
with current trunk we get this in test.cpp.176t.cplxlower0:
static void std::_Destroy_aux< >::__destroy(_ForwardIterator,
_ForwardIterator) [with _ForwardIterator = std::basic_string*; bool
= false] (struc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64269
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 12 13:32:16 2014
New Revision: 218669
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218669&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/64269
* tree-ssa-forwprop.c (simplify_builtin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64265
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64265
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
static void
instrument_func_entry (void)
{
basic_block succ_bb;
gimple_stmt_iterator gsi;
tree ret_addr, builtin_decl;
gimple g;
succ_bb = single_succ (ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR_FOR_FN (cfun));
gsi = gsi_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64265
--- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger ---
and now I see that his example is mis-compiled too:
cat test1.cpp
int test1(int x)
{
abc:
x=x+1;
__builtin_printf("Test %d\n", x);
if (x<9)
goto abc;
return 0;
}
is transformed to this in test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64261
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ville.voutilainen at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64274
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Dec 12 14:02:37 2014
New Revision: 218671
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218671&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/64274
* fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc): Add ANY_I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64274
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64154
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cltang at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63707
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63399
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578
--- Comment #12 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Fredrik Hederstierna from comment #9)
> Created attachment 33866 [details]
> Simple patch to exclude use of ip
>
> Simple patch that make it possible to optionally exclude use of ip for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61373
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to John Breitenbach from comment #2)
> Created attachment 33301 [details]
> siphash24.i
>
> sorry for forgetting this attachment in the original report.
mapcs-frame comes from a time when N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64241
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Dec 12 15:10:08 2014
New Revision: 218675
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218675&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/64241
* libsupc++/exception_ptr.h: Return empty obje
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63604
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57846
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60691
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60632
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61924
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60691
--- Comment #6 from Fabian Vogt ---
If sjlj exceptions are not supported for ARM, shouldn't the configure option be
invalid for ARM or at least print a warning?
If an option does exist and it simply crashes the compiler during make, it's
definite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60691
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Just don't do silly things.
Just because an option exists doesn't mean you need to use it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64285
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus ---
*** Bug 64285 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus ---
Now fails with the following backtrace. The location of the failure might have
changed due to the patch at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg01076.html ; in any case,
currently the failure is:
f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64182
--- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Fri Dec 12 15:46:57 2014
New Revision: 218678
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218678&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/64182
* wide-int.h (wi::div_r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64287
Bug ID: 64287
Summary: Disable -fuse-caller-save when -pg is active
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64287
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Summary|Disable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64288
Bug ID: 64288
Summary: libstdc++ testsuite not compatible with -fno-rtti or
-fno-exceptions
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64265
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64276
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Dec 12 15:58:49 2014
New Revision: 218679
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218679&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/64276
* doc/doxygen/user.cfg.in: Define __cpp_except
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64276
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64287
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
AFAIK, Radovan (radovan.obrado...@imgtec.com) is working on this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64241
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64289
Bug ID: 64289
Summary: ICE with -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64287
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64289
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60691
--- Comment #8 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #6)
> If sjlj exceptions are not supported for ARM, shouldn't the configure option
> be invalid for ARM or at least print a warning?
> If an option does exist and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59302
Dmitry Vyukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dvyukov at google dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59410
Dmitry Vyukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dvyukov at google dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64289
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 34267
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34267&action=edit
gcc5-pr64289.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64290
Bug ID: 64290
Summary: Destructor not called at deallocation of LHS
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61402
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Dec 12 16:43:16 2014
New Revision: 218680
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218680&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/61402
* lambda.c (add_capture): Don't pass a dependent type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59410
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64265
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Seems there are more such spots that insert stmts at gsi_after_labels of
single_succ of entry block - e.g. ipa-split.c, omp-low.c, tree-inline.c,
tree-into-ssa.c, tree-profile.c, tree-ssa-reassoc.c at least.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63996
--- Comment #1 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Fri Dec 12 17:14:54 2014
New Revision: 218682
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218682&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/63996
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_loop_expr): Don't loop
endle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63996
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Fri Dec 12 17:17:58 2014
New Revision: 218683
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218683&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/63996
* g++.dg/cpp1y/pr63996.C: New file.
Added:
trunk/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64265
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, I don't see any kind of memory leak on any of the testcases.
Sure, calling __tsan_func_entry many times is of course wrong.
As for #c5, clang doesn't call __tsan_func_exit in that case either. Dmitry?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64265
Dmitry Vyukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dvyukov at google dot com
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64246
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
Created attachment 34269
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34269&action=edit
Concatenated testcase
To be gnatchop-ed and compile at -O.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61307
Chris Manghane changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64265
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Doing it in gimplify_function_tree is pretty straightforward, after all, we
already have there code to handle
if (flag_instrument_function_entry_exit
&& !DECL_NO_INSTRUMENT_FUNCTION_ENTRY_EXIT (fndecl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64291
Bug ID: 64291
Summary: [5 Regression] Miscompile t-div in GMP's testsuite
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Pr
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
