https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63877
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Nov 25 08:28:45 2014
New Revision: 218039
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218039&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/63877
* c-decl.c (start_function): Disable -Wmissing-decla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63877
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63970
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64058
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15272
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|paolo.carlini at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64066
Bug ID: 64066
Summary: [F2008] Wrongly accepts ; (semicolon) at ending a null
token
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64065
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64061
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64056
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64059
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64060
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61402
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64060
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64067
Bug ID: 64067
Summary: ICE involving compound literal shenanigans
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64050
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 64060 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64067
--- Comment #1 from Mason ---
Created attachment 34108
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34108&action=edit
ICE diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64067
Mason changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||polacek at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 from Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64056
--- Comment #2 from ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Tue Nov 25 09:48:47 2014
New Revision: 218041
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218041&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64056
* gcc.target/i386/chkp-strlen-4.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64057
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Summary|Overlapping memcp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64068
Bug ID: 64068
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE: in remove_unreachable_nodes, at
ipa.c:546
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64068
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61925
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
On trunk I get
vector.c:6:1: error: unrecognizable insn:
(insn 3 2 4 2 (set (reg/v:TI 101 [ a ])
(mem/c:TI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 81 virtual-incoming-args)
(const_int 16 [0x10])) [1 a+0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63375
--- Comment #17 from Mikael Pettersson ---
(In reply to Pranith Kumar from comment #16)
> printf("%d\n", *(int *)(&val1+4));
This is broken, you're invoking undefined behaviour.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64050
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 34110
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34110&action=edit
Suggested patch v1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63786
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61927
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, we store
MEM[(logical(kind=4) *)_227] = vect_patt_319.44_273;
...
MEM[(logical(kind=4) *)_227 + 4B] = vect_patt_318.52_169;
...
MEM[(logical(kind=4) *)_227 + 8B] = vect_patt_304.60_132;
...
the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61927
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
A different possible fix is to re-order pattern recog back to before
analyzing data ref accesses. Vectorization then fails during SLP analysis.
I'm going to test both patches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60436
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 25 11:16:27 2014
New Revision: 218042
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218042&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR preprocessor/60436
* line-map.c (linemap_line_start): If highe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61649
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||korbb at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> Doh, so it is, I misread the test code.
>
> Rainer, what does this print (when compiled with -std=c++11)?
>
> #include
> #include
>
> int ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64055
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Revision r217101 is OK.
Not in my case: at r217915, the test FAILs for the 32-bit multilib of
both the i386-apple-darwin14.0.0 and x86_6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61649
--- Comment #3 from Richard PALO ---
No. Prior to fixincludes, sys/feature_tests.h in SunOS looks like the
following:
#if (defined(__STDC__) && defined(_STDC_C99))
#define _RESTRICT_KYWD restrict
#else
#define _RESTRICT_KYWD
#endif
Illumos ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61649
--- Comment #4 from Richard PALO ---
>
> The test/base/sys/feature_tests.h patch is as follows:
> --- fixincludes/tests/base/sys/feature_tests.h.orig 2010-06-21
> 15:27:29.0 +
> +++ fixincludes/tests/base/sys/feature_tests.h
> @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63995
--- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Patch removing duplicating bounds symbols is in review. With this patch
applied bootstrap goes till the end but there are lots of stage2 and stage3
comparison error. I looked into one of them and the differ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63995
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63995
>
> --- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich ---
> Patch removing duplicating bounds symbo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64065
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64065
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64065
>
> Joost VandeVondele changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64065
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63786
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Nov 25 13:48:49 2014
New Revision: 218043
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218043&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-11-25 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/63786
* parser.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63786
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64067
Mason changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE involving compound |ICE in expand_expr_real_1,
|li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63853
tocarip.intel at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tocarip.intel at gmail do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64068
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Introduced by r217973:
commit ca92a2511ecb05fb7c84df998723c257f23b6ca7
Author: hubicka
Date: Sat Nov 22 21:08:07 2014 +
* ipa.c (symbol_table::remove_unreachable_nodes): Mark all inline
clones
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64067
Mason changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Mas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62238
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
This is a tree sharing issue, it reproduces with -O3 and a single concatenated
source as well.
Index: gcc/tree-predcom.c
===
--- gcc/tree-pred
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61927
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 25 14:55:29 2014
New Revision: 218046
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218046&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-25 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/61927
* tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61927
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.0
Summary|[4.9/5 Regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63995
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Created attachment 34112
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34112&action=edit
-g0 problem reproducer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64069
Bug ID: 64069
Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE on allocating character array
with source
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64065
--- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> Created attachment 34111 [details]
> patch
>
> Can you try this?
Cool, fixed!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64050
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Nov 25 15:16:27 2014
New Revision: 218048
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218048&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-25 Martin Liska
PR bootstrap/64050
PR ipa/64060
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64060
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Nov 25 15:16:27 2014
New Revision: 218048
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218048&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-25 Martin Liska
PR bootstrap/64050
PR ipa/64060
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63995
--- Comment #6 from Ilya Enkovich ---
For attached -g0 problem reproducer:
>gcc pr63995-2.c -c -O2 -mmpx -fcheck-pointer-bounds -g -o 1.o
>gcc pr63995-2.c -c -O2 -mmpx -fcheck-pointer-bounds -g0 -o 2.o
>objdump_pl -d 1.o >1.dump
>objdump_pl -d 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64069
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Thanks - so it looks as though the problem is in std::stod which is pretty
simple, and can be reduced to:
#include
#include
#include
int main()
{
double d;
char* endptr;
errno = 0;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64065
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64065
>
> --- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele ethz.ch> ---
> (In reply to Rich
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60449
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64069
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61743
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63731
--- Comment #19 from boger at us dot ibm.com ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #18)
> The -a option to "go build" means to rebuild all packages rather than using
> the installed versions (see http://golang.org/cmd/go for documentation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50770
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64065
--- Comment #7 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6)
> Does the restrict stuff make any performance difference?
Not noticeable for the particular benchmark I'm running overnight.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> Thanks - so it looks as though the problem is in std::stod which is pretty
> simple, and can be reduced to:
[...]
> Maybe Solaris' strtod() do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64069
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58754
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63995
--- Comment #7 from Ilya Enkovich ---
In chkpopt pass calls to bndmk are moved down to uses to decrease register
pressure. Debug info introduces new uses and therefore it affects a position
where bndmk calls appear.
-g0 case:
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64050
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61420
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Aha, of course.
Maybe we should just add this to the test for now?
// https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
// { dg-xfail-if "" { *-*-solaris* } { "*" } { "" } }
If 40411 gets fixed it will
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64070
Bug ID: 64070
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/devirt-42.C -std=gnu++11
scan-ipa-dump-times inline "First type is base of
second" 3
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> Aha, of course.
>
> Maybe we should just add this to the test for now?
>
> // https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
> // { dg-xfa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64070
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 34113
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34113&action=edit
Tree dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61634
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
The issue seems that we fail to detect hybrid SLP here because
vect_detect_hybrid_slp_stmts walks immediate uses of SLP defs but those
do not reach pattern stmts but only original ones. In this case we have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62250
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
The gfortran command does not explicitly link with libatomic.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64065
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 25 16:43:24 2014
New Revision: 218049
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218049&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-25 Richard Biener
PR lto/64065
* lto-streamer-out.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64071
Bug ID: 64071
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/dollar_sym_1.f90 -O (test for
excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64065
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64071
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64071
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63851
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
OK, I can reproduce the problem on x86_64 with following simple patch applied:
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-icf.c b/gcc/ipa-icf.c
index 4875dec..c985052 100644
--- a/gcc/ipa-icf.c
+++ b/gcc/ipa-icf.c
@@ -606,6 +606,1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor ---
*** Bug 64041 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64041
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64070
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64060
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64070
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64037
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Miscompilation with -Os and |[4.8/4.9/5 Regression]
|enum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64052
Eugene changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.7.2 |4.8.1
--- Comment #2 from Eugene ---
As per ht
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64072
Bug ID: 64072
Summary: wrong cgraph node profile count
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63703
--- Comment #16 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Tue Nov 25 19:01:08 2014
New Revision: 218058
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218058&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/63703
* config/rs6000/darwin.h (REGIST
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63593
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
So it seems like tree_transform_and_unroll_loop creates a wrong PHI:
_101 = PHI
where the type of _101 and pretmp_103 is int, and ivtmp_47 is unsigned. How
that ivtmp_47 gets there is a mystery to me, but i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64073
Bug ID: 64073
Summary: Explicit duplicate template instantiation not reported
as error when using 'using'
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64073
--- Comment #1 from Eugene ---
Created attachment 34117
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34117&action=edit
Code sample illustrating the problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64020
dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63527
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Nov 25 20:20:10 2014
New Revision: 218059
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218059&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-25 Vladimir Makarov
PR target/63527
* ira-lives.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64074
Bug ID: 64074
Summary: PowerPC E500: Passing of double parameters not EABI
compliant
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63527
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Nov 25 20:54:16 2014
New Revision: 218061
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218061&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add a test for PR target/63527
PR target/63527
* gcc.targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63527
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63534
--- Comment #72 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Nov 25 21:07:43 2014
New Revision: 218062
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218062&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add a testcase for PR target/63534
PR target/63534
* gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64042
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |5.0
--- Comment #4 from vries
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
