https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63922
Bug ID: 63922
Summary: Compiler error with OpenMP, default(none) and an
integer parameter array
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63844
--- Comment #4 from Andi Kleen ---
I had a typo in the test case (remove += to make the loops identical)
#define N 1000
int a[N], b[N], c[N];
main()
{
int i;
#pragma omp parallel num_threads(4)
for (i = 0; i < N; i++) {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
--- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Nov 17 22:09:27 2014
New Revision: 217677
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217677&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/33911
gcc/cp/
* call.c (build_call_a): Don't warn_deprecat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63888
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Nov 17 22:12:55 2014
New Revision: 217678
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217678&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Export "detect_leaks=0"
PR bootstrap/63888
* bootstrap-asa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63888
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63913
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment #2 from H
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63923
Bug ID: 63923
Summary: FAIL: libgomp.c/examples-4/e.50.1.c (test for excess
errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63906
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Nov 18 00:14:25 2014
New Revision: 217683
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217683&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-17 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/63906
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63731
--- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
That's really a question for the glibc maintainers. It's entirely a glibc
issue.
My understanding is that it's not actually libc.so that needs to be found.
Glibc implements /etc/nsswitch.conf by loading
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63924
Bug ID: 63924
Summary: Constexpr constructible expression "is not constexpr"
when used in a template non-type argument
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63924
--- Comment #1 from Nikos ---
Special thanks and kudos to "T.C." for helping figuring this out:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/25465379
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56041
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
This doesn't seem like a bug to me, unless they run with unexpected
results. My guess of the reason of different generated code can be the
mapping of registers and variables. s0, s1, s2 are not symmetric as
they are mapping to different parameter registers. GCC may choose
different sequence, in ord
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63906
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57335
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57941
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 57941, which changed state.
Bug 57941 Summary: [c++11] confusing error message with invalid constexpr
constructor in template struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57941
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63925
Bug ID: 63925
Summary: ICE with C++14 constexpr when trying to constexprify
std::min
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63917
--- Comment #2 from Zhenqiang Chen ---
Thanks for the report. I can reproduce the FAIL on IA32. Since the patch does
not impact on -O0, it seams some library functions are wrong. I will
investigate it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63731
--- Comment #8 from Yohei Ueda ---
If we can distinguish between the "not found" errors due to invalid host names
and no nss, we can fall back to netgo only when nss is not available.
I noticed that errno is set to 0 for invalid hostnames, and i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33975|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33977|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33976|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63926
Bug ID: 63926
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE in estimate_edge_growth, at
ipa-inline.h:300
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63470
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34007|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34008|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34009|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63913
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63802
--- Comment #4 from ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ygribov
Date: Tue Nov 18 07:37:17 2014
New Revision: 217689
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217689&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-18 Yury Gribov
PR sanitizer/63802
gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63470
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
101 - 131 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
