https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63731
--- Comment #4 from Yohei Ueda ---
Thank you for the correction.
I need to use the following instructions to enable netgo with GC.
$ go version
go version devel +ae495517bd72 Fri Nov 14 11:43:01 2014 +1100 linux/amd64
$ go build -ldflags '-link
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63874
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63894
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63895
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63896
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63894
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Fixed by r217634. I will add the testcase and then close this bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63897
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63898
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63901
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63901
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Peter,
The whole hardware multiply selection thing is a bit of a mess...
The uploaded patch should resolve the problem for now by building newlib with
software multiply enabled.
In the long term we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63907
Bug ID: 63907
Summary: libitm/config/posix/rwlock.cc doesn't compile
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63906
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63894
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Author: trippels
Date: Mon Nov 17 09:21:34 2014
New Revision: 217648
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217648&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add testcase for PR 63894
2014-11-17 Markus Trippelsdorf
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63894
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Component|lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63898
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, so this is the missing effect of
case RDIV_EXPR:
/* Don't touch a floating-point divide by zero unless the mode
of the constant can represent infinity. */
if (TREE_CODE (arg1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63898
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63892
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63891
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63898
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Nov 17 09:31:33 2014
New Revision: 217650
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217650&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-17 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/63898
* match.pd: G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63888
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63883
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63898
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63898
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Nov 17 09:38:48 2014
New Revision: 217652
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217652&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-17 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/63898
PR middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63883
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Nov 17 09:38:48 2014
New Revision: 217652
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217652&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-17 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/63898
PR middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63880
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Indeed this is a case we don't handle as QOI special-case (we accept other
cases of strictly undefined code though).
In this case it is recommended to just do
arglist *p = malloc (sizeof (arglist) + sizeof
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63879
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Summary|ICE compiling Lin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63908
Bug ID: 63908
Summary: [e500v2] "float_bessel"case failed on e500v2 platforms
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63908
--- Comment #1 from leimaohui ---
I changed the gcc from 4.9.1 to 4.9.2 in yocto,and tested these cases.
The results are the same.
But when I changed the gcc to 4.8.2,the results of these cases are PASS.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63909
Bug ID: 63909
Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in
ipa_icf_gimple::func_checker::compare_bb()
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63909
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63910
Bug ID: 63910
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE: simplify_immed_subreg, at
simplify-rtx.c:5519 with
-mstringop-strategy=vector_loop -mavx512f
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63911
Bug ID: 63911
Summary: ICE: xpected tree that contains 'decl common'
structure, have 'identifier_node' in dump_aggr_type,
at cp/error.c:650 with -fdump-ipa-all
-fsa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63912
Bug ID: 63912
Summary: ice in in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:339
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63913
Bug ID: 63913
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: statement
marked for throw, but doesn't with
-fnon-call-exceptions -fsanitize=bool
Product: gcc
V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63914
Bug ID: 63914
Summary: ice in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:517
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63901
--- Comment #3 from Peter A. Bigot ---
But it's already bad, because you have the list of MCUs hard-coded into the
compiler source, which is a lot worse than doing through the specs.
It's really unfortunate that somebody decided to exclude me fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63912
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63894
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63914
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
--- Comment #17 from Uroš Bizjak ---
On alpha-linux-gnu, I got following g++ failures:
FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/builtin-arith-overflow-17.c -O0 execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/builtin-arith-overflow-17.c -O2 execution test
FAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63897
Igor Zamyatin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63897
--- Comment #6 from Igor Zamyatin ---
after RA=after reload
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63911
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63866
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63913
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63915
Bug ID: 63915
Summary: gomp/pr60823-2.c:31:1: error: dead STMT in EH table
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63868
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Verbin ---
It seems that support of offload sections in Mach-O will require substantial
changes to gcc/config/darwin.c, like it was done for LTO.
I'm going to disable the generation of any offload sections when a compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63868
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Ilya Verbin from comment #4)
> It seems that support of offload sections in Mach-O will require substantial
> changes to gcc/config/darwin.c, like it was done for LTO.
>
> I'm going to disable t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63915
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63914
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63914
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
We try to transition from
{ Inf, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0 } * { 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0 } == { Nan, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0 }
to
VARYING * { 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0 } == { 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0 }
which is... "interesting". -ffast-math
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60428
--- Comment #3 from Pierre Ossman ---
Comments?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63913
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63910
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
Hi all,
Today I noticed something strange with the way gcc optimises ternary
operations in c (and c++). Consider the following example where I call
foo(int) passing the clamped value of (s0, s1, s2):
/**/
#include
extern
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, so SCCVN only can forward constant addresses (because variable ones
wouldn't fit in the same refs vector without "inserting" ops). See
vn_reference_maybe_forwprop_address. It's also required so that w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63916
Bug ID: 63916
Summary: value-numbering fails to forward variable addresses
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63916
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63731
--- Comment #5 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
You are correct. The go command does not rebuild the standard library for
gccgo. There is at present no reasonable way to use the netgo tag with gccgo.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63917
Bug ID: 63917
Summary: [5 Regression] r217646 caused many failures
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63917
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63908
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, leimaohui at cn dot fujitsu.com wrote:
> kernel :3.4.74
Don't expect particularly meaningful floating-point results on e500 for
any kernel without my six-patch series
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42575
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63918
Bug ID: 63918
Summary: Error in declaration goto statement
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63918
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52282
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Nov 17 17:00:38 2014
New Revision: 217660
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217660&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/52282
* decl.c (build_ptrmemfunc_type): Don't build a diffe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63917
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63919
Bug ID: 63919
Summary: Segfault with r217560 building 462.libquantum from
cpu2006
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63919
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63898
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63854
dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63920
Bug ID: 63920
Summary: Any regular expression should not match an empty
sequence if match_not_null is specified
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63731
--- Comment #6 from boger at us dot ibm.com ---
I understand why some functions like getaddrinfo don't work with static linking
unless the LD_LIBRARY_PATH is set to find libc.so, but then what should happen
if it isn't?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63921
Bug ID: 63921
Summary: [F08] pointer function as lvalue doesn't work when the
function is a type bound function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63844
--- Comment #2 from Andi Kleen ---
Regression, doesn't happen on 4.8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 52282, which changed state.
Bug 52282 Summary: [C++0x] rejects-valid issues with decltype/constexpr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52282
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52282
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63868
iverbin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50473
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Nov 17 20:17:56 2014
New Revision: 217672
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217672&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/50473
* decl.c (cp_finish_decl): Don't try to process a non
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50473
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 50473, which changed state.
Bug 50473 Summary: [C++0x] ICE in type_has_nontrivial_copy_init, at
cp/tree.c:2574
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50473
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63906
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> Created attachment 33996 [details]
> the .i file
Andrew, I'll start to work on this soon. Sorry for inconvenience introduced by
LRA remat. pass.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53181
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54968
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 54968, which changed state.
Bug 54968 Summary: spurious constexpr error,
20_util/tuple/comparison_operators/35480_neg.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54968
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55039
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 55039, which changed state.
Bug 55039 Summary: std::addressof vs. constexpr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55039
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55039
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Krügler ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #5)
Given that there exists the still open issue
http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-active.html#2296
should this bugzilla issue remain open?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63844
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63841
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63841
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63837
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63815
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55039
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse ---
std::addressof can be constexpr with -std=gnu++XX, and even in strict mode
std::__addressof can be constexpr for internal use in libstdc++.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63841
--- Comment #10 from Teresa Johnson ---
Missed that one, I will backport to 4.8.
Teresa
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:17 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63841
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63815
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55992
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
