https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63286
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Fri Sep 19 18:54:23 2014
New Revision: 215403
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215403&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/63286
* tree.c (need_assembler_name_p): Do not mangle vari
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63178
Dima Kogan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63315
Bug ID: 63315
Summary: -fcompare-debug bootstrap issue in libjava
(fixup_abnormal_edges related)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60100
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gccbugs at dima dot
secretsauce.ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63178
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63315
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
We have:
(insn 10025 3 10026 2 (set (reg:SI 85 [ D.39608 ])
(mem/u/j:SI (const:DI (plus:DI (symbol_ref:DI
("_otable_gnu_xml_util_XCat$Catalog") [flags 0x2] )
(const_int 68 [0x44
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61392
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61392
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ABI, ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63255
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
This is ordering issue in node removal (there is code to read constructor from
file before removing the symbol for symbol table, but it is executed after the
symbol is marked removed). I am testing:
Index: ipa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63286
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63226
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63186
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
Yes, this patch should apply to 4.9 as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63166
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62102
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
I think that would be rather symptomatic fix and I plan to push out the type
verifier soon that will ICE without the patch on all targets. I failed to
reproduce this on x86 (I thought originally I have reproduc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61283
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61825
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
Hi,
this patch implements necessary bits to record what symbols was declared
nonzero and refuse visibility changes that would change the difference
(i.e. turn it into alias, weakref or weak). Possibly we will w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63186
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5 Regression] |[4.9 Regression] Undefined
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62053
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
I am looking into it now...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63314
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63259
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61825
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Fri Sep 19 23:56:52 2014
New Revision: 215409
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215409&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/61825
* c-family/c-common.c (handle_alias_ifunc_attribute)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61465
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Sep 20 00:54:55 2014
New Revision: 215413
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215413&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/61465
* call.c (convert_like_real) [ck_identity]: Call mark
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61392
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Sep 20 00:55:14 2014
New Revision: 215414
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215414&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/61392
* mangle.c (write_expression): Use unresolved-name ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61392
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63255
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sat Sep 20 02:58:42 2014
New Revision: 215415
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215415&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/63255
* ipa.c (symbol_table::remove_unreacha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61511
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17480
Lőrinczy Zsigmond changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lzsiga at axelero dot hu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54412
--- Comment #10 from Roland Schulz ---
Created attachment 33520
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33520&action=edit
Slightly modified testcase
This slightly modified testcase in which the return value isn't stored, still
segfa
101 - 128 of 128 matches
Mail list logo