https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55095
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63222
Bug ID: 63222
Summary: Ada.Directories.Delete_File refuses to delete dangling
symlinks
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.7
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63172
--- Comment #1 from Dominik Vogt ---
Created attachment 33468
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33468&action=edit
Test prog for Go
Run and watch for differences in the output lines. They should be identical.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63172
--- Comment #2 from Dominik Vogt ---
Created attachment 33469
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33469&action=edit
Test prog for C
Run with "./mycplx2_c 5 6".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63172
--- Comment #3 from Dominik Vogt ---
So the problem is that for some targets gcc's constant folding may yield a
different result for floating point calculations than the result if the
calculations were done on the target. The attached test progr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58945
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31126|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63223
Bug ID: 63223
Summary: [avr] Make jumptables work with
-Wl,--section-start,.text=
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63223
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||avr
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63223
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Sep 11 08:08:17 2014
New Revision: 215152
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215152&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/63223
* config/avr/avr.md (*tablejump.3byte-pc): N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63223
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Sep 11 08:19:45 2014
New Revision: 215153
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215153&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2014-09-11 trunk r215152.
PR target/63223
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63223
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63219
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #6 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0)
>> The new gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c test FAILs on 64-bit SPARC (only;
>> 32-bit is
>> o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63215
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #5)
> > Hmm, we can easily distinguish them by seeing whether a definition is
> > available.
>
> Well, what happens in this testcase is that we see ABS at LTO time, we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63219
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63220
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63219
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Sep 11 10:01:20 2014
New Revision: 215160
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215160&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/63219
* include/bits/regex.h (match_results::format)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63219
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Sep 11 10:39:37 2014
New Revision: 215161
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215161&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/63219
* include/bits/regex.h (match_results::format)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63219
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63218
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41043
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 11 10:57:26 2014
New Revision: 215162
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215162&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-09-11 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/41043
* match-conv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63219
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
N.B. as a workaround for GCC 4.9.1 you can call the function with an explicit
template argument list:
std::string fmt = "$1";
m.format>(fmt);
For 4.9.1 the template argument matches the superfluous pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678
--- Comment #67 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 11 12:12:28 2014
New Revision: 215168
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215168&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/58678
* ipa-devirt.c (ipa_devirt): Don't check DECL_COMDAT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678
--- Comment #66 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 11 12:11:47 2014
New Revision: 215167
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215167&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/58678
* ipa-devirt.c (ipa_devirt): Don't check DECL_COMDAT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63224
Bug ID: 63224
Summary: False Positive for -Wmaybe-uninitialized at -Os, not
-O2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63224
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill ---
Created attachment 33471
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33471&action=edit
Preprocessed RTEMS msdos_conv.c which reproduces the issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63225
Bug ID: 63225
Summary: ada bootstrap failure when -fno-inline in
STAGE1_CFLAGS
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63224
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Huber ---
I think this is a false positive warning.
The relevant code is:
for ( i = 0;
name_size
&& (c = msdos_get_valid_utf16_filename_character ( long_name[i])
);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63225
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 33472
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33472&action=edit
Declare Vector_To_Uint
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63226
Bug ID: 63226
Summary: ICE with -flto-odr-type-merging
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63139
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 11 13:50:27 2014
New Revision: 215171
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215171&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/63139
* pt.c (tsubst_pack_expansion): Simplify substitution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63139
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 11 13:51:11 2014
New Revision: 215172
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215172&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/63139
* pt.c (tsubst_pack_expansion): Simplify substitution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63224
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63224
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
I'm sure that bug is already filled and analyzed, but I cannot find it right
now.
The problem there (and probably here) is that a && b is converted to a & b, and
b is uninitialized if and only if (a =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63226
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
When simplifying the code names, I made a mistake. It should be "class TWO" and
not "class ONE" in file two.ii.
Hence, only the typedef'ed ynodetype and, hence, ynodetype are different. The
classes are diffe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55095
--- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #6)
>
> Still broken a couple of years later. I just got bitten by this one.
I think we want this but nobody so far got enough free time to work on it. In
the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63224
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Huber ---
Which dump?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56748
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56654
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63224
--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #4)
> I'm sure that bug is already filled and analyzed, but I cannot find it right
> now.
>
> The problem there (and probably here) is that a && b is conv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
--- Comment #15 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Marek, is this fixed? Can we close it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
--- Comment #16 from Marek Polacek ---
What's not fixed is this:
r.c:3:5: note: expected ‘int (*)(double *)’ but argument is of type ‘int
(*)(int *)’
int callf (int, int, int (*)(double *));
^
we should point to the actual parameter. I thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55095
--- Comment #8 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #7)
> I think we want this but nobody so far got enough free time to work on it.
I checked Redhat Fedora and only three packages out of about
9,600 that I look
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63220
--- Comment #2 from davidxl ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> First of all you should mark the functions 'inline' as well.
This does not help.
Then the issue
> is that 'eq' is called indirectly which isn't allowed for always_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52451
Szabolcs Nagy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nszabolcs at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63227
Bug ID: 63227
Summary: regex_replace fails on BOOST example
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63139
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61489
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Sep 11 18:08:24 2014
New Revision: 215186
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215186&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-09-11 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/61489
* doc/invoke.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61489
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63228
Bug ID: 63228
Summary: -m16 doesn't work if gcc is compiled for x32
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63226
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63228
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63229
Bug ID: 63229
Summary: [5.0 Regression] FAIL: ./except-1.h -O0 (internal
compiler error)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63226
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
Turning the assert to warning (I probably ought to do that and also compare
alignments) gets me the following:
one.ii:7:16: warning: type �struct ynodetype_t� violates one definition rule
[-Wodr]
typedef stru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63230
Bug ID: 63230
Summary: allocation of deferred length character as derived
type component causes internal compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63231
Bug ID: 63231
Summary: value stored in register %eax overwritten by temporary
value stored in same register
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63231
h.vandierendonck at qub dot ac.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h.vandierendonck at qu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58757
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
Author: glisse
Date: Thu Sep 11 20:55:37 2014
New Revision: 215191
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215191&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-09-11 Marc Glisse
PR target/58757
gcc/c-family/
* c-cppbui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63231
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63232
Bug ID: 63232
Summary: Deferred length character field of derived type looses
its value when used in subroutine call
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63233
Bug ID: 63233
Summary: Valid out of bounds access leads to undefined behavior
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63233
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48826
baoshan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pangbw at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10 from b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48826
--- Comment #11 from baoshan ---
And I don't thing it is the best place to fix this bug in function try_split().
Why not fix it at where the ICE occurs? It is just the wrong expectation from
function dwarf2out_var_location(). Why not just look fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63233
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|RESO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63233
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> This is not a valid out of bounds access in C.
Sometime it might be better to acknowledge where GCC could help rather than
simply close the bug saying to u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63234
Bug ID: 63234
Summary: arm used label is removed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63233
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56654
--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #1)
> But while this is not simple a "is used" because of "if (b < 40)"? That
> seems to be the major bug here.
Wow, I should not type in a hurry. What I m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52954
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leis at in dot tum.de
--- Comment #3 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63228
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Sep 11 22:18:06 2014
New Revision: 215194
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215194&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Also turn off OPTION_MASK_ABI_X32 for -m16
PR target/63228
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63233
--- Comment #5 from leis at in dot tum.de ---
Thanks. I did notice that I get warning with optimization but not without,
which is strange indeed.
However, obviously my real problem is more complicated, and I'm trying to
understand if I violate th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63228
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Sep 11 22:28:16 2014
New Revision: 215195
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215195&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Also turn off OPTION_MASK_ABI_X32 for -m16
Backport from mainl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63228
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63229
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63229
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63232
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63230
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63229
--- Comment #3 from Trevor Saunders ---
> --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Likely r214834.
I bet its the same as
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00730.html which I'll
commit the fix for as soon as it finishes testing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63226
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
Hi,
this is patch I am testing. It fixes few issues in the ODR comparsions code
and seems to handle this testcase sanely.
Honza
Index: ipa-devirt.c
===
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52773
--- Comment #10 from fdarkangel at gmail dot com ---
The patch seems to be working; but it doesn't seem to be accepted. Why not?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52897
--- Comment #4 from fdarkangel at gmail dot com ---
Bump. Any news? gcc 4.9.1 doesn't look good either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63227
Tim Shen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||timshen at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63236
Bug ID: 63236
Summary: building fails with --disable-bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63235
Bug ID: 63235
Summary: building fails with --disable-bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63235
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
*** Bug 63236 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63236
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63235
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63235
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Also please try to reproduce with 4.8.3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63227
ofv at wanadoo dot es changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63235
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Maybe this is why bootstrap is even more important :).
93 matches
Mail list logo
