https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63090
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|Zspam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63010
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|Zspam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63059
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|Zspam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63046
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|Zspam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63057
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|Zspam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63089
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|Zspam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63102
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|Zspam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63088
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|Zspam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62944
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|Zspam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63042
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|Zspam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62980
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|Zspam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62999
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|Zspam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63101
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|Zspam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63073
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|Zspam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63121
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|Zspam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62942
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|Zspam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63070
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|Zspam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62973
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|Zspam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62974
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63098
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|Zspam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63066
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|Zspam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62971
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|Zspam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62982
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|rtl-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63126
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|Zspam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63125
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|Zspam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63020
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|rtl-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63028
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|rtl-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63000
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|rtl-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63060
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|rtl-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63040
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|rtl-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63072
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|rtl-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63106
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|rtl-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62943
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62282
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #16 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 33433
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33433&action=edit
bb-slp-11.c.126t.slp2 dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #17 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 33434
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33434&action=edit
bb-slp-26.c.120t.slp1 dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #18 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
>> > So ... can you test enabling vect64 for sparc?
>>
>> While it works for the test at hand, the two other tests using vect64
>> (bb-slp-11.c and bb-slp-26.c) now FAIL:
>>
>> FAIL: g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63128
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63129
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63130
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62278
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62536
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62246
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63131
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62174
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62282
--- Comment #11 from Dmitry Petrov ---
>Which of the above mentioned semantics you want for your inlines?
Semantics that would allow me get code that links even with -O0 without need to
dublicate function body.
I can understand how this code can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62663
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson ---
Without -msep-data gcc outputs
jsr square_test
With -msep-data gcc outputs
move.l square_test@GOT(%a5),%a0
jsr (%a0)
Is that move.l unavailable on the mcf5307? (I'm familiar w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62296
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #16)
> Created attachment 33433 [details]
> bb-slp-11.c.126t.slp2 dump
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-11.c:19:8: note:
not vectorized: re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #17)
> Created attachment 33434 [details]
> bb-slp-26.c.120t.slp1 dump
For this we see
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-26.c:19:14: note:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63011
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|rtl-optimizati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63092
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|rtl-optimizati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63052
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|rtl-optimizati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62940
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63084
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|rtl-optimizati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63117
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|rtl-optimizati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61986
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62291
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Btw, the testcase is absymally slow in compiling even with -O1 if you enable
glibc memory checking with both(!) MALLOC_CHECK_=3 and MALLOC_PERTURB_=69
I have no idea why... (constant overhead seems to be on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63135
Bug ID: 63135
Summary: [4.9 regression] Infinite loop in var-tracking
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63135
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||s390x-ibm-linux
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63135
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.3, 5.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63137
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|crypto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63136
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|crypto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63138
Bug ID: 63138
Summary: Gentleman!!*Watch NEW ZEALAND vs USA Live Streaming
Online
Product: gcc
Version: new-ra
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63138
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|boots
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63139
Bug ID: 63139
Summary: Class-scope typedef overwrites typedef of previously
defined class
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62306
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I don't remember, but IRC log does something:
IRC #gcc on oftc Dec 1 2009
jason: so, I have a patch to handle the implicit cdtors in extern
template class by exporting the cdtors at the explicit instantiati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63139
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62662
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62308
--- Comment #2 from yml ---
But with the option of -mlittle-endian ,it would not have this error. Do it
prove that the backend support zero-length arrays passed by value ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62662
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That is perhaps where we started to have %r11 clobbered in the routine
(therefore pro_and_epilogue wanted to save %r11-%r15), and all the %r11 uses
later disappear because of later passes (I think cprop_hardr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62306
--- Comment #4 from Rafael Avila de Espindola ---
So it looks like the reason was
My thinking was that the ABI change should also support implementations
that implement D0 as another entry point into the destructor
jason: leav
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62308
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55334
--- Comment #38 from Vidya Praveen ---
Until we fix this issue, could we have workaround posted by Martin Jambor
(comment #29) applied again on 4.9 and trunk? This issue is not seen on 4.8
releases because of the workaround. Having the workaround
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62306
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
You could e.g. implement the dtors as:
_Z...D0...:
set some hard reg to 0
tail call some function
_Z...D1...:
set some hard reg to 1
tail call some function
_Z...D2...:
set some hard reg to 2
tail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
--- Comment #28 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #27)
> Possible fix:
Applied to trunk, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63140
Bug ID: 63140
Summary: wrong code generation probably due to optimization
problem
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63140
--- Comment #1 from Ralf Hoffmann ---
Created attachment 33436
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33436&action=edit
(gzipped) preprocessed input file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62275
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Sep 2 15:57:56 2014
New Revision: 214825
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214825&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM][1/2] Implement lceil, lfloor, lround optabs with new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62275
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Sep 2 16:00:01 2014
New Revision: 214826
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214826&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[2/2] Vectorise lroundf, lfloorf, lceilf using the new ARM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62275
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62270
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Sep 2 16:08:05 2014
New Revision: 214827
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214827&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/62270
* interface.c (compare_parameter): Fix conditi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62270
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63142
Bug ID: 63142
Summary: gcc-cilk can not spawn a function template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63142
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Try:
g++ -o fib -fcilkplus -lcilkrts fib.cpp
instead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62306
--- Comment #6 from Rafael Avila de Espindola ---
OK, so should we declare r206182 an "unintentional bug fix" and mark this bug
wontfix?
To be clear, the ABI then is
For any class an implementation has the option of using one comdat per
constru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62015
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63145
Bug ID: 63145
Summary: [AArch64] ICE with vcombine_u64 at -O2 -g
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63145
--- Comment #1 from christophe.lyon at st dot com ---
Created attachment 33438
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33438&action=edit
vcombine.c testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62275
--- Comment #5 from Joshua Conner ---
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63145
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62040
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christophe.lyon at st dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63140
--- Comment #2 from Ralf Hoffmann ---
Small update: The working 32 bit target was gcc 4.7, so it's not related to
this bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62224
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
I don't see cppmodelmanager in that link command, so I'm guessing ensureUpdated
is hidden in a different .so? Certainly compiling the preprocessed file you
attached provides a definition of the symbol. Can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62174
--- Comment #3 from Fritz Reese ---
> Patches should go to the gcc-patches at gcc.gnu.org mailing list (and in
> case of Fortran FE patches also CC fortran at gcc.gnu.org ml). That is
> where patch review happens.
Sorry - submitted to the maili
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62306
--- Comment #7 from Rafael Avila de Espindola ---
(In reply to Rafael Avila de Espindola from comment #6)
> OK, so should we declare r206182 an "unintentional bug fix" and mark this
> bug wontfix?
>
One thing to keep in mind. If r206182 was the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62224
--- Comment #7 from Chris Clayton ---
Created attachment 33439
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33439&action=edit
Pre-processed cppcodemodelinspectordialog
cppcodemodelinspectordialog.ii compressed with xz.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55409
Freddie Chopin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||freddie_chopin at op dot pl
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62296
--- Comment #3 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> On x86_64-apple-darwin13.3, for the test in comment 1 I get
>
>0 0 ''
> sh: /bin/false: No such file or directory
> 127
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62224
--- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
I don't think this is a compiler bug.
cppmodelmanager.o is simply missing in the object file list of the
libCppEditor.so link command.
And the undefined symbol from cppcodemodelinspectordialog.ii is a
401 - 500 of 528 matches
Mail list logo