https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43934
--- Comment #4 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chrbr
Date: Fri Jun 6 07:21:02 2014
New Revision: 211302
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211302&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/43934
* tree-ssa-loop-im.c (determine_max_mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61425
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
\| is just undefined in BRE, so an implementation can do whatever it wants.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56574
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|wrong-code |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61423
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53927
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Jun 6 08:13:24 2014
New Revision: 211308
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211308&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/53927
* function.c (instantiate_decls): Process the s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61320
--- Comment #31 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #30 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
> Can you run the test manually under gdb and tell me what is the value for the
> "out" variable in hex format?
Sure: the -O0 test aborts
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61320
--- Comment #32 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #31)
> > --- Comment #30 from Thomas Preud'homme
> > ---
> > Can you run the test manually under gdb and tell me what is the value for
> > the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61123
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60755
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60878
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60771
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61305
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60199
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
Yes, this is fixed, I'm adding the testcase and closing the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60199
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jun 6 09:52:33 2014
New Revision: 211310
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211310&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-06 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/60199
* g++.dg/cpp0x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60199
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60432
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini ---
Let's add the testcase and close the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60432
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jun 6 10:00:55 2014
New Revision: 211312
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211312&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-06 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/60432
* g++.dg/cpp0x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60432
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60184
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61423
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61320
--- Comment #33 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #32 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
[...]
> Are you sure the patch was applied to this test? Line 78 I have "bfin.inval =
> (struct ok) { 0x83, 0x85, 0x87, 0x89 };"
>
> The ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888
M Welinder changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||terra at gnome dot org
--- Comment #31 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61320
--- Comment #34 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Ok, committed then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51373
Vladimír Štill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vl.still at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51373
--- Comment #4 from Vladimír Štill ---
Problem is still present in 4.8.2, reproduce with following code, which
compiles in clang 3.4 (both with -std=c++11):
struct Y {
int o;
static constexpr int Y::* x = &Y::o;
};
gcc -v result included
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51373
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888
--- Comment #32 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 6 Jun 2014, terra at gnome dot org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888
>
> M Welinder changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51373
--- Comment #6 from Vladimír Štill ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> Fixed in 4.9.0 though
I'm glad to hear that, I could not yet installed 4.9.0 in my OS.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888
--- Comment #33 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Yeah, I'd say we could document that gcc doesn't support any implementations
where memcpy/memmove/memset clobber errno.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56574
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61428
Bug ID: 61428
Summary: "maybe-uninitialized" is broken in all current
versions (4.7-4.10)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56574
--- Comment #10 from Andy Lutomirski ---
See PR59500 for another example without &&. I think I can reduce another test
case with only if and else.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61429
Bug ID: 61429
Summary: SYSTEM_CLOCK used with non-default integer kind does
not produce warning
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61421
--- Comment #19 from mimamer at gmail dot com ---
One last comment on strict aliasing rules: It is ironic that these rules are
supposed to make programs faster, but those developers that really care about
speed are prevented from implementing even
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61423
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 32901
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32901&action=edit
Proposed patch
This patch fies invalid code gen, but unfortunately uncovers a problem in REE
pass and fails boots
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59299
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jun 6 15:31:47 2014
New Revision: 211317
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211317&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-06 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/59299
* tree-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61430
Bug ID: 61430
Summary: [4.10 regression] ICE in lra_create_copy
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59299
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61430
--- Comment #1 from christophe.lyon at st dot com ---
Created attachment 32902
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32902&action=edit
vfscanf.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61431
Bug ID: 61431
Summary: Powerpc tests pack01.c and p8vector-int128-2.c fail on
little endian power8 systems
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61423
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 32903
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32903&action=edit
Testcase that fails in REE pass
This testcase fails with patched gcc in REE pass:
cc1 -O2 -m32 -march=corei7 lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61430
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-none-linux-gnueabihf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61423
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61428
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61431
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60184
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jun 6 16:01:37 2014
New Revision: 211318
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211318&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-06-06 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/60184
* class.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 60184, which changed state.
Bug 60184 Summary: g++ does not allow static members of named unions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60184
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60184
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61430
--- Comment #3 from christophe.lyon at st dot com ---
Probably, since the build succeeded at rev 211303.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61429
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61325
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Jun 6 17:21:18 2014
New Revision: 211319
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211319&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-06 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/61325
* l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61325
--- Comment #8 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Jun 6 17:22:34 2014
New Revision: 211320
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211320&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-06 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/61325
* l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61423
--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Jun 6 17:45:10 2014
New Revision: 211321
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211321&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/61423
* config/i386/i386.md (*floatunssi2_i387_wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61432
Bug ID: 61432
Summary: Build error gcc 4.9 on OSX 10.10
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61432
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61431
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 32905
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32905&action=edit
Proposed patch to fix the problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||denji0k at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36453
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/dr_412.htm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
So it turns out there is a defect report against the C, see PR 36453 but that
is only for #elif and not #if defined(a) && a()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36453
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |NEW
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61433
Bug ID: 61433
Summary: [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in
friend_accessible_p (search.c:778) with -std=gnu++11
-O -fcompare-debug -fno-inline -fno-ipa-pure-const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38757
--- Comment #6 from Mark Wielaard ---
Current 4.9 rebased version of the patch is here:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/gcc.git/tree/gcc49-pr38757.patch
/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.10.0 20140606 (experimental) [trunk revision 211299] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c; a.out
$ gcc-trunk -fno-tree-vectorize -O3 small.c; a.out
$ gcc-4.9.0 -O3 small.c; a.out
$
$ gcc-trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61283
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61431
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Fri Jun 6 23:15:36 2014
New Revision: 211329
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211329&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-06 Michael Meissner
PR target/61431
* config/rs60
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61435
Bug ID: 61435
Summary: -imacros switch breaks warning/error reporting
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61435
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think this is a dup of bug 60723.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61431
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Fri Jun 6 23:46:23 2014
New Revision: 211331
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211331&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-06 Michael Meissner
Back port from trunk
2014-06-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61431
--- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Fri Jun 6 23:52:36 2014
New Revision: 211332
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211332&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-06 Michael Meissner
Back port from trunk
2014-06-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18343
--- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Author: hp
Date: Fri Jun 6 23:58:33 2014
New Revision: 211333
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211333&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/18343
* gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-return-1.c (S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18343
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18343
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Woops, this PR was actually for an *identical* file in gcc.dg. Anyway, that
test passes without the patch these days so let's keep this PR closed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61436
Bug ID: 61436
Summary: [4.10 Regression]: g++.dg/tls/diag-1.C ICE (emutls)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61387
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61436
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|mmix-knuth-mmixware |mmix-knuth-mmixware,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61436
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.10.0 20140606 (experimental) [trunk revision 211322] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 -c foo.c
$ gcc-trunk -O2 -c main.c
$ gcc-trunk -O2 foo.o main.o
$ a.out
a.out: foo.c:9: foo: Assertion `b == 0' failed.
Ab
-trunk
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.10.0 20140606 (experimental) [trunk revision 211322] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c; a.out
$ gcc-4.9.0 -O3 small.c; a.out
$
$ gcc-trunk -O3 small.c
small.c: In function ‘foo’:
small.c:12:1: internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61439
Bug ID: 61439
Summary: contrib/download_prerequisites script does not verify
integrity of packages
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
79 matches
Mail list logo
