[Bug target/61407] Build errors on latest OS X 10.10 Yosemite with Xcode 6 on GCC 4.8.3

2014-06-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Looks like the Mac OS X's headers are not C99/C++98 compatible at all: /Applications/Xcode6-Beta.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.10.sdk/usr/include/Availability.h:174

[Bug sanitizer/61408] New: r205695 breaks packaging step of Firefox 24 ESR on Ubuntu Lucid building with ASan

2014-06-03 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61408 Bug ID: 61408 Summary: r205695 breaks packaging step of Firefox 24 ESR on Ubuntu Lucid building with ASan Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug sanitizer/61408] r205695 breaks packaging step of Firefox 24 ESR on Ubuntu Lucid building with ASan

2014-06-03 Thread gk at torproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61408 --- Comment #1 from Georg Koppen --- I am happy to debug this further (and am, of course, interested in a fix/workaround). Let me know what you need.

[Bug target/61407] Build errors on latest OS X 10.10 Yosemite with Xcode 6 on GCC 4.8.3

2014-06-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Looks like the Mac OS X's headers are not C99/C++98 compatible at all: > > /Applications/Xcode6-Beta.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/ > Develope

[Bug tree-optimization/58483] missing optimization opportunity for const std::vector compared to std::array

2014-06-03 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58483 --- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to dennis luehring from comment #7) [clang] > void *__builtin_operator_new(size_t) > void __builtin_operator_delete(void*) I don't understand why N3664 is talking of new expressions instead of operat

[Bug c++/51253] [C++11][DR 1030] Evaluation order (sequenced-before relation) among initializer-clauses in braced-init-list

2014-06-03 Thread akim.demaille at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51253 --- Comment #15 from Akim Demaille --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #13) > (In reply to Akim Demaille from comment #10) > > auto t = std::make_tuple(incr(), incr()); > > That's not an initializer-list, it's a function call, so the

<    1   2