[Bug libgcc/61238] New: Getting Linker error

2014-05-19 Thread varun_s22 at yahoo dot co.in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61238 Bug ID: 61238 Summary: Getting Linker error Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgcc Assignee:

[Bug c/61236] GCC 4.9 generates incorrect object code

2014-05-19 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61236 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug rtl-optimization/61239] New: [4.10 Regression]: ICE in decompose, at rtl.h when compiling vshuf-v16hi.c using -mavx2

2014-05-19 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61239 Bug ID: 61239 Summary: [4.10 Regression]: ICE in decompose, at rtl.h when compiling vshuf-v16hi.c using -mavx2 Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/61208] armhf: generated asm code produces "branch out of range" error in gas with -Os

2014-05-19 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61208 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug go/61232] [4.10 Regression] link errors building libgo

2014-05-19 Thread ian at airs dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61232 --- Comment #8 from Ian Lance Taylor --- The naming is confusing and but the idea seems sound. It doesn't make sense for a static symbol to be DECL_ONE_ONLY. But currently DECL_ONE_ONLY just means that the symbol has a comdat group. So given t

[Bug go/61232] [4.10 Regression] link errors building libgo

2014-05-19 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61232 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka --- > The naming is confusing and but the idea seems sound. It doesn't make sense > for a static symbol to be DECL_ONE_ONLY. But currently DECL_ONE_ONLY just > means that the symbol has a comdat group. So given

[Bug c/61240] New: Incorrect warning "integer overflow in expression" on pointer-pointer subtraction

2014-05-19 Thread Keith.S.Thompson at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61240 Bug ID: 61240 Summary: Incorrect warning "integer overflow in expression" on pointer-pointer subtraction Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug go/61232] [4.10 Regression] link errors building libgo

2014-05-19 Thread ian at airs dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61232 --- Comment #10 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Yes, I think that would be clearer. Your patch does seem to fix the problem building libgo. Thanks.

[Bug go/61232] [4.10 Regression] link errors building libgo

2014-05-19 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61232 --- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka --- > Yes, I think that would be clearer. > > Your patch does seem to fix the problem building libgo. Thanks. Thanks for help! I am testing updated patch - it turns out that I needed to revisit about every use

[Bug c++/57063] static_cast from data member to rvalue reference sometimes wrongfully produces lvalue

2014-05-19 Thread ppluzhnikov at google dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57063 --- Comment #6 from Paul Pluzhnikov --- Google ref: b/15091778

[Bug rtl-optimization/61241] New: built-in memset makes the caller function slower than normal memset

2014-05-19 Thread ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61241 Bug ID: 61241 Summary: built-in memset makes the caller function slower than normal memset Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/61242] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] Bogus "no matching function for call to ‘Foo::Create()"

2014-05-19 Thread ppluzhnikov at google dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61242 Bug ID: 61242 Summary: [4.9/4.10 Regression] Bogus "no matching function for call to ‘Foo::Create()" Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/61242] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Bogus "no matching function for call to ‘Foo::Create()"

2014-05-19 Thread ppluzhnikov at google dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61242 --- Comment #1 from Paul Pluzhnikov --- Forgot to mention: moving struct A and Create out of Foo and into global scope fixes the problem.

[Bug rtl-optimization/61241] built-in memset makes the caller function slower than normal memset

2014-05-19 Thread ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61241 --- Comment #1 from ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn --- Created attachment 32822 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32822&action=edit proposed patch

[Bug rtl-optimization/61241] built-in memset makes the caller function slower than normal memset

2014-05-19 Thread ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61241 --- Comment #2 from ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn --- Created attachment 32823 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32823&action=edit testcase should be put into gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm

[Bug rtl-optimization/61220] [4.10 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2239

2014-05-19 Thread zhenqiang.chen at linaro dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61220 zhenqiang.chen at linaro dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zhenqiang.chen at linar

[Bug middle-end/61225] [4.10 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

2014-05-19 Thread zhenqiang.chen at linaro dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 --- Comment #2 from zhenqiang.chen at linaro dot org --- Patch @r210457 enhances move_insn_for_shrink_wrap to sink more instructions out of entry block. For ICE, it tries to sink a SP adjustment instruction. But some useful information is lost du

[Bug libstdc++/61227] [C++11] Regex [\w] does not work

2014-05-19 Thread timshen at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61227 --- Comment #5 from Tim Shen --- Author: timshen Date: Tue May 20 04:31:54 2014 New Revision: 210630 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210630&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-05-20 Tim Shen PR libstdc++/61227 * include/bits/regex_compil

[Bug middle-end/61243] New: [4.10 Regression] verify_flow_info failed: No region crossing jump at section boundary in bb 65

2014-05-19 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61243 Bug ID: 61243 Summary: [4.10 Regression] verify_flow_info failed: No region crossing jump at section boundary in bb 65 Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/60758] Infinite backtrace in __cxa_end_cleanup

2014-05-19 Thread alexey.merzlyakov at samsung dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60758 --- Comment #9 from Alexey Merzlyakov --- The following PR has been opened for Thumb1 problem: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61223

[Bug middle-end/61243] [4.10 Regression] verify_flow_info failed: No region crossing jump at section boundary in bb 65

2014-05-19 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61243 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug middle-end/61243] [4.10 Regression] verify_flow_info failed: No region crossing jump at section boundary in bb 65

2014-05-19 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61243 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

<    1   2