[Bug ipa/61160] [4.9/4.10 Regression] wrong code with -O3 (or ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed: edge points to wrong declaration)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61160 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/61166] New: overflow when parse number in std::duration operator""

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61166 Bug ID: 61166 Summary: overflow when parse number in std::duration operator"" Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug c/61162] possibly bad error location with -Wc++-compat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61162 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #4) > Note that it is also wrong in the initializer case. Right, my patch fixes this too. (In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #5) > But, curiously, in this case it poi

[Bug c/61162] possibly bad error location with -Wc++-compat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61162 --- Comment #7 from Tom Tromey --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #6) > I'd prefer the RHS location here; it's the RHS that's being converted. I was hoping to automate some conversion from C to C++ using the error locations. So from th

[Bug middle-end/60787] [4.7 Regression] ICE in expand_builtin_eh_common, at except.c:1953

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60787 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- r172430 exposed it, r190284 made it latent again. The testcase also fails with early inlining disabled.

[Bug ipa/60973] Invalid propagation of a tail call in devirt pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60973 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/60382] [4.8 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in vect_create_epilog_for_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4352)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60382 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- hmm, interesting - I can't reproduce the failure but will backport anyway (it's a safe fix).

[Bug c++/10437] "using namespace" at global scope creates incorrect code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10437 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Richard Smith from comment #11) > I disagree. The failure is not in the immediate context of the substitution, > so this is a hard error. GCC seems to be doing the right thing in all cases > h

[Bug target/61060] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:400 with -free-ter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61060 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue May 13 08:28:53 2014 New Revision: 210352 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210352&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/61060 * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_set_or_movmem): I

[Bug target/61060] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:400 with -free-ter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61060 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue May 13 08:31:29 2014 New Revision: 210353 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210353&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/61060 * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_set_or_movmem): I

[Bug c++/61167] New: ::std::map::operator[]() throws arithmetic exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61167 Bug ID: 61167 Summary: ::std::map::operator[]() throws arithmetic exception Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug c/61144] Invalid optimizations for extern vars with local weak definitions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61144 --- Comment #16 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Rich Felker from comment #15) > Can you clarify? As far as I can tell, the other bug is a missed > optimization and this is an overly-aggressive, incorrect optimization. The same test is wrong, i

[Bug middle-end/58094] [4.9 Regression] IPA devirt testsuite errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58094 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW CC|

[Bug libstdc++/61075] parallel std::accumulate reduct type cannot be different than the iterated type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61075 --- Comment #4 from Denes Matetelki --- Thank you for the reply, Jonathan. I understand your reasoning and not sure if my desires has much impact in the future of GCC. I'm suprised that the same source code cannot be compiled with parallel mode

[Bug target/61060] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:400 with -free-ter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61060 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug libstdc++/61143] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Arithmetic exception on emplacing into unordered_map moved out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61143 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hrehf...@uni-koblenz.de --- Comment #7

[Bug c++/61167] ::std::map::operator[]() throws arithmetic exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61167 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/58094] [4.9 Regression] IPA devirt testsuite errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58094 --- Comment #9 from Matthias Klose --- x86_64-linux-gnu and i586-linux-gnu too

[Bug libstdc++/61075] parallel std::accumulate reduct type cannot be different than the iterated type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61075 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Denes Matetelki from comment #4) > I'm suprised that the same source code cannot be compiled with parallel > mode. It would be ugly to branch with #ifdef _GLIBCXX_PARALLEL. > Also, I feel it s

[Bug c++/61167] ::std::map::operator[]() throws arithmetic exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61167 --- Comment #2 from hrehf...@uni-koblenz.de --- Thanks! :-)

[Bug libstdc++/61143] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Arithmetic exception on emplacing into unordered_map moved out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61143 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wak

[Bug c/61165] bad location for conversion in return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61165 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/61162] possibly bad error location with -Wc++-compat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61162 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug c/61165] bad location for conversion in return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61165 --- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #0) > > I find this a bit strange. The actual "warning:" line points to > the #define -- but here I think I would have expected this to > point to the call instead

[Bug c/61165] bad location for conversion in return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61165 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #3) > (In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #0) > > > > I find this a bit strange. The actual "warning:" line points to > > the #define -- but here I think

[Bug lto/61168] New: Assembler options (-Wa,*) are not propagated when using -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61168 Bug ID: 61168 Summary: Assembler options (-Wa,*) are not propagated when using -flto Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/61138] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] Wrong code with pointer-bounds remapping

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61138 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c/61137] [4.10 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/ia64/small-addr-1.c (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61137 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0

[Bug tree-optimization/61139] missed fma optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61139 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug tree-optimization/61139] missed fma/reassoc optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61139 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|missed fma optimization |missed fma/reassoc |

[Bug libstdc++/61075] parallel std::accumulate reduct type cannot be different than the iterated type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61075 Denes Matetelki changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/61075] parallel std::accumulate reduct type cannot be different than the iterated type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61075 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |WONTFIX --- Comment #7 from Jonathan W

[Bug libstdc++/61166] overflow when parse number in std::duration operator""

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61166 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|kan.liu.229 at gmail dot com |3dw4rd at verizon dot net --- Co

[Bug c++/12944] [meta-bug] C++ name-lookup problems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12944 Bug 12944 depends on bug 10437, which changed state. Bug 10437 Summary: "using namespace" at global scope creates incorrect code https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10437 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/10437] "using namespace" at global scope creates incorrect code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10437 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug ipa/60973] Invalid propagation of a tail call in devirt pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60973 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue May 13 11:04:44 2014 New Revision: 210364 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210364&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-05-13 Richard Biener PR ipa/60973 * tree-inline.c (rema

[Bug ipa/60973] Invalid propagation of a tail call in devirt pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60973 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue May 13 11:06:00 2014 New Revision: 210365 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210365&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-05-13 Richard Biener PR ipa/60973 * tree-inline.c (rema

[Bug ipa/60973] Invalid propagation of a tail call in devirt pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60973 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/61141] [4.10 Regression] c-common.c:1502:1: ICE: in reset_insn_used_flags, at emit-rtl.c:2677

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61141 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0

[Bug libstdc++/60497] unique_ptr tries to complete its type T even though it's not required to be a complete type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60497 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue May 13 11:18:01 2014 New Revision: 210366 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210366&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/60497 * include/std/tuple (get, __tuple_compare): Qua

[Bug ipa/61144] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Invalid optimizations for extern vars with local weak definitions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61144 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug target/61154] [4.10 Regression][ARM] wide-int merge introduced regressions in vshuf tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61154 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0 Summary|[ARM] wide-in

[Bug c++/61134] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression][C++11] bogus "no matching function for call..."

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61134 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.4 Version|unknown

[Bug c/61129] Feature request: integer-overflow-detecting arithmetic intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61129 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- There was a recent proof-of-concept patch on the mailinglist to implement that.

[Bug c++/61169] New: [4.6,4.7,4.8,4.9] unnecessarily honors bracket in mathematical statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61169 Bug ID: 61169 Summary: [4.6,4.7,4.8,4.9] unnecessarily honors bracket in mathematical statements Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug target/61170] New: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/declare-simd-[12].f90 on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61170 Bug ID: 61170 Summary: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/declare-simd-[12].f90 on darwin Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug tree-optimization/61171] New: vectorization fails for a reduction in presence of subtraction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61171 Bug ID: 61171 Summary: vectorization fails for a reduction in presence of subtraction Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/61172] New: C++11: ICE with invalid call to template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61172 Bug ID: 61172 Summary: C++11: ICE with invalid call to template class Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c+

[Bug libfortran/61173] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] Erroneous "end of file" with internal read

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61173 Bug ID: 61173 Summary: [4.9/4.10 Regression] Erroneous "end of file" with internal read Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/61172] C++11: ICE with invalid call to template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61172 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Schlüter --- (I see that it mentions macports. To avoid all confusion: I also see this ICE it with unmodified gcc-4.7.2 on Linux.)

[Bug c++/61172] C++11: ICE with invalid call to template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61172 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/57086] Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57086 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tobi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #13

[Bug tree-optimization/61169] [4.6,4.7,4.8,4.9] unnecessarily honors bracket in mathematical statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61169 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |tree-optimization --- Comment #1 from Pa

[Bug c++/61174] New: [4.9 Regression] Bad resolving of specialized template with const-qualified member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61174 Bug ID: 61174 Summary: [4.9 Regression] Bad resolving of specialized template with const-qualified member function Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/61174] Bad resolving of specialized template with const-qualified member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61174 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.9 Regression] Bad|Bad resolving of |reso

[Bug tree-optimization/61175] New: failing vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61175 Bug ID: 61175 Summary: failing vectorization Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug c++/61172] C++11: ICE with invalid call to template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61172 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Schlüter --- Thanks! I wonder which option I missed when I was searching for duplicates :(

[Bug tree-optimization/60382] [4.8 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in vect_create_epilog_for_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4352)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60382 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue May 13 13:21:47 2014 New Revision: 210371 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210371&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-05-13 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2014-03-04

[Bug libfortran/61173] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Erroneous "end of file" with internal read

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61173 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/61169] [4.6,4.7,4.8,4.9] unnecessarily honors bracket in mathematical statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61169 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/61166] overflow when parse number in std::duration operator""

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61166 --- Comment #2 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 32789 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32789&action=edit Patch to parse_nmber to make it unsigned long long all over. Works on x86_64-linux.

[Bug libstdc++/61166] overflow when parse number in std::duration operator""

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61166 --- Comment #3 from Kan Liu --- (In reply to emsr from comment #2) > Created attachment 32789 [details] > Patch to parse_nmber to make it unsigned long long all over. > > Works on x86_64-linux. Yeah, it works. Thank you!

[Bug libstdc++/61166] overflow when parse number in std::duration operator""

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61166 --- Comment #4 from Kan Liu --- btw, is it really necessary to use functionality in parse_number.h to parse manually? What *parse_number* has done is no more than the general *operator""(unsigned long long)*, and it just enables *0b* and *0B* pre

[Bug lto/60981] lto-plugin configuration doesn't test for -static-libgcc (OSX gcc -> clang)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60981 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #3 from Tony Theodore --- > I'm building a cross compiler with: > > Host: x86_64-apple-darwin13.1.0 > Targets: i686-pc-mingw32 x86_64-w64-mingw32 i686-w64-mingw32 > Build:

[Bug lto/60981] lto-plugin configuration doesn't test for -static-libgcc (OSX gcc -> clang)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60981 --- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 32790 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32790&action=edit proposed patch

[Bug c++/61174] Bad resolving of specialized template with const-qualified member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61174 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini --- By the way, this does *not* compile with 4.8, neither with 4.7, ...

[Bug plugins/61176] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176 Bug ID: 61176 Summary: [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/57086] Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57086 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stanislav.manilov at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/60081] Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60081 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carl

[Bug libfortran/61173] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Erroneous "end of file" with internal read

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61173 Keith Refson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||krefson at googlemail dot com --- Comment

[Bug libfortran/61173] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Erroneous "end of file" with internal read

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61173 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/61174] Bad resolving of specialized template with const-qualified member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61174 --- Comment #3 from alkino --- It works with ideone (gcc-4.8.1) https://ideone.com/t8Jww2

[Bug fortran/60928] gfortran issue with allocatable components and OpenMP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60928 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNC

[Bug c++/61174] Bad resolving of specialized template with const-qualified member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61174 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/47054] Compilation error when cray pointers are declared in both host and internal subroutines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47054 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/60497] unique_ptr tries to complete its type T even though it's not required to be a complete type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60497 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug fortran/61156] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] Internal compiler error for Fortran files when specifying a file instead of an include directory with -I

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61156 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/61174] Bad resolving of specialized template with const-qualified member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61174 --- Comment #5 from alkino --- Can you tell me why, please? Thanks to look at it.

[Bug plugins/61176] [4.9/4.10 Regression] plugin builds including gimple.h not building

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.1 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biene

[Bug c++/61174] Bad resolving of specialized template with const-qualified member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61174 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini --- Instead of starting from scratch, why don't you use std::is_member_function_pointer? It handles correctly all sorts of member functions. Alternately, study the implementation and learn from it. In any case,

[Bug libstdc++/61143] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Arithmetic exception on emplacing into unordered_map moved out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61143 --- Comment #9 from Felix Fontein --- Another workaround is to use reserve(), as in: std::unordered_map b = std::move(a); a.reserve(1); // any number > 0 will do a.emplace(1, 1);

[Bug fortran/60928] gfortran issue with allocatable components and OpenMP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60928 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/54310] Order of operations during overload resolution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54310 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini --- Current SolarisStudio also accepts it. I guess I'm going to add the testcase and close the bug.

[Bug c/61177] New: armv6zk: gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61177 Bug ID: 61177 Summary: armv6zk: gcc Product: gcc Version: 4.6.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at

[Bug lto/60981] lto-plugin configuration doesn't test for -static-libgcc (OSX gcc -> clang)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60981 --- Comment #6 from Tony Theodore --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #4) > > --- Comment #3 from Tony Theodore --- > > I'm building a cross compiler with: > > It would have helped enormously if you'd stated so in the fi

[Bug c/61165] bad location for conversion in return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61165 Tom Tromey changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/61177] armv6zk: gcc fails compile one source file with fPIC and mthumb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61177 Rion changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rion4ik at gmail dot com Known to work|

[Bug c/61177] armv6zk: gcc fails compile one source file with fPIC and mthumb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61177 --- Comment #2 from Rion --- Created attachment 32791 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32791&action=edit test.c example code.

[Bug c/61162] possibly bad error location with -Wc++-compat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61162 --- Comment #9 from Tom Tromey --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #8) > If you point to '=', then the macro expansion note will not appear in your > other example (PR61165). Yeah, I still think the '=' is preferable. I think it l

[Bug c++/61178] New: expansion pattern '#'nontype_argument_pack' not supported by dump_expr#

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61178 Bug ID: 61178 Summary: expansion pattern '#'nontype_argument_pack' not supported by dump_expr# Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug c++/55252] Caret diagnostic doesn't show useful location when macro clashes with name in system header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55252 Tom Tromey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #14 f

[Bug c++/54890] Incorrect SFINAE Rejection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54890 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug c++/60628] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [c++11] ICE initializing array of auto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60628 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue May 13 16:05:07 2014 New Revision: 210382 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210382&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/60628 * decl.c (create_array_type_for_decl): Complain about

[Bug c++/60367] Default argument object is not getting constructed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60367 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue May 13 16:05:01 2014 New Revision: 210381 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210381&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/60367 * call.c (convert_default_arg): Remove special handli

[Bug c++/60713] [4.8 regression] ICE in iterative_hash_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60713 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue May 13 16:05:13 2014 New Revision: 210383 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210383&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/60713 * typeck2.c (PICFLAG_SIDE_EFFECTS): New. (picflag_

[Bug c++/60708] [4.8 Regression] An array temporary causes an ICE in gimplify

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60708 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue May 13 16:05:19 2014 New Revision: 210384 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210384&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/60708 * call.c (build_array_conv): Call complete_type. Adde

[Bug c++/61066] [4.8 Regression] Many testcase failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61066 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/60367] Default argument object is not getting constructed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60367 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/60708] [4.8 Regression] An array temporary causes an ICE in gimplify

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60708 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/60713] [4.8 regression] ICE in iterative_hash_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60713 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   >