http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61092
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
The failure can be triggered with an attached precompiled source using a
crosscompiler from x86-64 to alphaev68-pc-linux-gnu, with -O2:
~/gcc-build-xxx/gcc/cc1plus -O2 -quiet wide-int.ii
cc1plus: error: no inc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60999
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed May 7 07:23:15 2014
New Revision: 210139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210139&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-05-06 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/60999
* pt.c (may
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60999
--- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed May 7 07:24:21 2014
New Revision: 210140
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210140&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-05-06 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/60999
* pt.c (may
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58246
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58246
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 7 07:59:26 2014
New Revision: 210141
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210141&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-07 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2013-08-29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61092
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57864
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 7 08:04:15 2014
New Revision: 210142
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210142&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-07 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/57864
* gcc.dg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57864
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 7 08:05:17 2014
New Revision: 210143
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210143&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-07 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/57864
* gcc.dg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57864
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57864
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 7 08:05:57 2014
New Revision: 210144
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210144&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-07 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/57864
* tree-s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57864
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 7 08:06:45 2014
New Revision: 210145
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210145&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-07 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/57864
* gcc.dg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59584
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61080
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61092
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Component|bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61091
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47953
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61085
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58383
jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resoluti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61084
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Created attachment 32752
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32752&action=edit
Patch for pdist regression
Here's a patch for the pdist regression. I'll need more info about
the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61092
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Jakub, what do you think about following c++ patch:
--cut here--
Index: semantics.c
===
--- semantics.c (revision 210137)
+++ semantics.c (working
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59330
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59334
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 7 10:01:36 2014
New Revision: 210146
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210146&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-07 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2013-11-29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59715
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 7 10:01:36 2014
New Revision: 210146
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210146&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-07 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2013-11-29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59715
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61093
Bug ID: 61093
Summary: faulty reference initialization in return statement
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59715
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 7 10:07:09 2014
New Revision: 210147
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210147&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-07 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2013-11-29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59330
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 7 10:07:09 2014
New Revision: 210147
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210147&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-07 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2013-11-29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59334
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 7 10:07:09 2014
New Revision: 210147
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210147&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-07 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2013-11-29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61092
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
See the discussions, this is a step in a bad direction, the backend builtins
should be folded only during gimplification (i.e. the gimple_fold_builtin
targhook), unless folding them is required e.g. for C++11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61089
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61082
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
extern "C" int printf(const char*, ...);
struct B { };
struct X : public B { long p; };
struct Y : public B { X q; };
Y foo( Y& y )
{
Y temp;
temp = y;
return temp;
}
int main( void )
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61091
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61093
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61093
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Actually to be precise it's equivalent to
return const_cast(reinterpret_cast(arg));
See 5.2.3 [expr.type.conv] paragraph 1 and 5.4 [expr.cast] paragraph 4 in the
standard.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61094
Bug ID: 61094
Summary: -O3 insn Internal compiler error in
copyprop_hardreg_forward_1, at regcprop.c:775
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59584
--- Comment #15 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #14)
> Ok, but it's not clear to me what the bug is and why it's not a target bug
> fixed by your changes.
Ok, I'll try to explain my point without putting time
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61034
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #7)
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6)
> > that's a conditional assignment AFAICS
>
> Ah, you are right of course. It shouldn't be conditional, but it wil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
Bug ID: 61095
Summary: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitiz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61086
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.2
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61034
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #7)
> > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6)
> > > that's a conditional assignment AFAICS
> >
> > Ah, you are r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59164
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59164
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 7 11:51:36 2014
New Revision: 210154
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210154&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-07 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2013-11-19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61093
--- Comment #3 from listcrawler at gmail dot com ---
Ah, thanks for the explanation!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
--- Comment #1 from Kostya Serebryany ---
I suspect a miscompile,
at least the following patch to the libsanitizer sources fixes the problem:
--- tsan_rtl.cc (revision 210145)
+++ tsan_rtl.cc (working copy)
@@ -584,7 +584,8 @@
if (kGoMode || s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52252
--- Comment #5 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Wed May 7 12:10:22 2014
New Revision: 210155
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210155&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
* tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_grouped_load_supported): New
ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61084
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org gnu.org> ---
[...]
> Here's a patch for the pdist regression. I'll need more info about
I've manually rebuilt cc1 and could successfull
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477
--- Comment #20 from JiYouguo ---
Got it. Thank you very much.
:)
2014-05-06 17:11 GMT+08:00 redi at gcc dot gnu.org :
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477
>
> --- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> (In reply to JiYouguo fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
Kostya Serebryany changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-*-* |
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61094
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61094
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Component|c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61092
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
IMHO fold_builtin should go away entirely in favor of gimple_fold_builtin.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
Kostya Serebryany changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61023
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.2
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Diffs:
@@ -53,31 +53,31 @@
Visiting statement:
p_4 = (long unsigned int *) _3;
which is likely CONSTANT
-Lattice value changed to CONSTANT 0x0 (0x0ffe0). Adding SSA edges
to worklist.
+Latti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
CCP2 does this to
:
_2 = addr_1(D) & 18446607734267707384;
_3 = _2 * 4;
p_4 = (long unsigned int *) _3;
_5 = p_4 + 8;
xxx_6 = (long unsigned int) _5;
_7 = xxx_6 > 4123168604159;
_8 = (int) _7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Started with r210113.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61091
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 5/7/2014 6:31 AM, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Should be fixed by r210149 (Richard B's patch to make HOST_WIDE_INT
> 64 bits wide)
Will test tonight.
Dave
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61023
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed May 7 14:12:06 2014
New Revision: 210158
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210158&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/61023
* include/bits/stl_tree.h (_Rb_tree::_M_move_ass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61023
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed May 7 14:12:37 2014
New Revision: 210159
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210159&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/61023
* include/bits/stl_tree.h (_Rb_tree::_M_move_ass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61023
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61034
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 7 14:19:14 2014
New Revision: 210160
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210160&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-07 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/61034
* tree-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61080
--- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed May 7 14:30:23 2014
New Revision: 210161
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210161&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-05-07 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/61080
* pt.c (ins
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61080
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61096
Bug ID: 61096
Summary: error_init lacks a location
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61096
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61086
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed May 7 14:43:22 2014
New Revision: 210162
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210162&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/61086
* include/bits/stl_iterator.h (__normal_iterator
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61097
Bug ID: 61097
Summary: Solaris linker change broke --disabled-shared support
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61082
--- Comment #5 from David Greene ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> Clang uses the same registers as GCC:
Ok, but that still doesn't explain why. Can you point me to wording in either
the x86-64 ABI or Itanium ABI that describe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61096
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Another testcase:
struct
{
char *v;
} s[] = { .v = 0 };
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61062
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61082
--- Comment #6 from David Greene ---
Bug filed against clang to see what they have to say.
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19675
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61098
Bug ID: 61098
Summary: Poor code setting count register for large loops
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61062
--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Looks to me as though this is probably a 4.8 and later regression. Prior to
that we had arm-specific builtins to deal with vzip and friends.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61098
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64-linux,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61096
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Note that there are 3 error_init calls that seem unreachable (?):
6783
6784 if (COMPLETE_TYPE_P (type) && TREE_CODE (TYPE_SIZE (type)) !=
INTEGER_CST)
6785 {
6786 error_init ("variable-sized
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61098
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 32754
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32754&action=edit
testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61086
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed May 7 15:05:22 2014
New Revision: 210163
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210163&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/61086
* include/bits/stl_iterator.h (__normal_iterator
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61086
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61034
--- Comment #11 from Marc Glisse ---
The committed patch doesn't seem to optimize as well as the hack. fre2 (- is
the hack and + is the new trunk, unless I confused my directories):
- _8 = _98;
+ _8 = MEM[(const struct I &)b_9(D)].o;
- _224 =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61099
Bug ID: 61099
Summary: Mac 2GB file limit error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61082
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61099
--- Comment #1 from Barry McInnes ---
Mac ifort test
[mac27:~] bmcinnes% ifort -c dave.f90
[mac27:~] bmcinnes% ifort -v
ifort version 14.0.1
[mac27:~] bmcinnes%
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57623
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 7 15:54:34 2014
New Revision: 210166
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210166&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2013-06-27 Jakub Jelinek
PR target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57623
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 7 15:57:48 2014
New Revision: 210168
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210168&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2013-06-27 Jakub Jelinek
PR target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 7 15:59:37 2014
New Revision: 210169
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210169&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2013-07-03 Jakub Jelinek
PR target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58209
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 7 16:00:33 2014
New Revision: 210170
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210170&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2013-08-23 Jakub Jelinek
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58277
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 7 16:01:24 2014
New Revision: 210171
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210171&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2013-08-30 Jakub Jelinek
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58325
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 7 16:03:49 2014
New Revision: 210172
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210172&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2013-09-09 Jakub Jelinek
PR c++/583
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58365
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 7 16:04:44 2014
New Revision: 210173
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210173&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2013-09-10 Jakub Jelinek
PR rtl-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58564
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 7 16:05:38 2014
New Revision: 210174
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210174&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2013-09-30 Jakub Jelinek
PR middle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59101
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 7 16:07:21 2014
New Revision: 210176
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210176&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2013-11-14 Jakub Jelinek
Uro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59014
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 7 16:08:28 2014
New Revision: 210177
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210177&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2013-11-27 Jakub Jelinek
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56930
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 7 16:09:41 2014
New Revision: 210178
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210178&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2013-11-28 Jakub Jelinek
PR c++/592
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59297
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 7 16:09:41 2014
New Revision: 210178
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210178&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2013-11-28 Jakub Jelinek
PR c++/592
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59011
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 7 16:10:35 2014
New Revision: 210179
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210179&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2013-12-03 Jakub Jelinek
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58809
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 7 16:11:42 2014
New Revision: 210180
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210180&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2013-10-21 Marek Polacek
PR middle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61082
--- Comment #8 from David Greene ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7)
> It is the matter of if the size of
>
> ---
> struct B { };
> struct X : public B { long p; };
> ---
>
> is size of long or not.
I don't understand. The class of conce
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57623
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 200 matches
Mail list logo
