http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60908
Bug ID: 60908
Summary: compiler bug related to trans-mem.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c++
A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60908
--- Comment #1 from Nobuhiro SUGANUMA ---
Created attachment 32643
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32643&action=edit
source code
Because of file size limit, I attached the source code.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60908
--- Comment #2 from Nobuhiro SUGANUMA ---
Created attachment 32644
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32644&action=edit
Link to .ii file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60902
--- Comment #20 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
All three testcases use the same inline function libavcodec/golomb.h:
314 /**
315 * read unsigned golomb rice code (jpegls).
316 */
317 static inline int get_ur_golomb_jpegls(GetBitContext *gb, int k
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60909
Bug ID: 60909
Summary: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2202 (unrecognizable
insn) with -mrdrnd and __builtin_ia32_rdrand32_step()
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60910
Bug ID: 60910
Summary: [4.10 regression] sparc-linux bootstrap failure due to
many "invalid conversion from 'int' to 'machine_mode'"
errors
Product: gcc
Version: 4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60911
Bug ID: 60911
Summary: [4.9/4.10 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -flto
-fipa-pta
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60912
Bug ID: 60912
Summary: [4.10 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-inline
-fipa-pta
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60913
Bug ID: 60913
Summary: Memory leak with deferred operators
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60914
Bug ID: 60914
Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV (use after free) in
bitmap_obstack_alloc_stat() with -flto
-fvtable-verify=preinit
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Sta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60913
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60913
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #30 from Bernd Edlinger ---
It looks like a bug in the assembler!
with objdump -d -r crtbegin.o we have wrong code:
f3: 83 ec 04sub$0x4,%esp
f6: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
f8: ba f0 ff ff
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60915
Bug ID: 60915
Summary: confusing diagnostic from attribute on function
definition
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #31 from Kai Tietz ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #30)
> It looks like a bug in the assembler!
>
> with objdump -d -r crtbegin.o we have wrong code:
>
> f3: 83 ec 04sub$0x4,%esp
> f6: 85 c0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44054
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32622|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60909
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #32 from Bernd Edlinger ---
OK,
opened a binutils-bug at: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16858
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #33 from Denis Excoffier ---
Created attachment 32651
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32651&action=edit
bootstrap works at least under i686
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #34 from Denis Excoffier ---
The patch under attachment 32651 seems to make bootstrapping behave better, at
least for i686.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #35 from Bernd Edlinger ---
would not using --disable-sjlj-excaptions cause any problems,
maybe a unwanted ABI-Change?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #36 from Denis Excoffier ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #35)
> would not using --disable-sjlj-excaptions cause any problems,
> maybe a unwanted ABI-Change?
I don't know really. Cygwin people usually build gcc using
--disa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30417
Andreas Fritiofson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Known to work|4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #37 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Denis Excoffier from comment #36)
> (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #35)
>> would not using --disable-sjlj-excaptions cause any problems,
>> maybe a unwanted ABI-Change?
> I don't know
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #38 from Denis Excoffier ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #37)
> Regarding your patch:
I've tested it and it works (as far as i can tell): the bootstrap has gone
until the end (installation in ${prefix}). objdump -d crtbeg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #39 from Kai Tietz ---
Well, the patch might work-a-round issue. Nevertheless it just paperbags the
real issue existing in binutils.
Additionally the patch would break x64 version of cygwin. At least that was
the reason why we introd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60916
Bug ID: 60916
Summary: truncated error message
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60909
--- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Apr 21 18:34:10 2014
New Revision: 209545
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209545&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/60909
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_builtin)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60917
Bug ID: 60917
Summary: sub-optimal diagnostic when instantiating template
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60836
--- Comment #6 from Paul Pluzhnikov ---
Richard, back-port to 4.9/4.8 release branches?
Thanks,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60909
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60902
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Assignee
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60781
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2316
--- Comment #53 from Harald van Dijk ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #52)
> (In reply to Harald van Dijk from comment #51)
> > extern "C" { void f(); }
> > typedef void t();
> > t f, *g = f; // valid redeclaration of f, invalid initialisa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59513
--- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Dominique, any progress on this one? Shall I look into it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #40 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Created attachment 32652
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32652&action=edit
another possible workaround
This is what I am bootstrapping right now.
Looks good so far, it just reached stage
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #41 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #39)
> Well, the patch might work-a-round issue. Nevertheless it just paperbags
> the real issue existing in binutils.
> Additionally the patch would break x64
> version
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60735
--- Comment #11 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Mon Apr 21 20:51:37 2014
New Revision: 209546
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209546&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2014-04-21 Michael Meissner
PR target/60735
* confi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60735
--- Comment #12 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Mon Apr 21 22:03:51 2014
New Revision: 209547
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209547&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2014-04-21 Michael Meissner
PR target/60735
* confi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60902
--- Comment #22 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I'm still working my way through the code, but it looks like we're mucking up
the value for "buf" and "k". Not really sure if that's the root cause is just
a downstream effect. Anyway, once the buf computa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60281
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Apr 22 05:55:40 2014
New Revision: 209554
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209554&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/60281
* asan.c (asan_emit_stack_protection): Force the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60914
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60902
--- Comment #23 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I think I see what's going on... Definitely mine.
44 matches
Mail list logo
