http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60758
Bug ID: 60758
Summary: Infinite backtrace in __cxa_end_cleanup
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60758
--- Comment #1 from Alexey Merzlyakov ---
Created attachment 32543
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32543&action=edit
Proposed patch
Proposed patch is attached.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60719
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Fri Apr 4 08:09:23 2014
New Revision: 209072
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209072&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix shell scripting.
PR bootstrap/60719
* Makefile.in (instal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60757
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Can you point to the recursion please?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60746
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60747
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60750
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60718
--- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger ---
in this example, we have
__class_poly_list_Node_type_p is alias_set 3
which is used for the list_type::head, next fields
and
__class_poly_list_Node_type is alias set 8
which is used for the parameter new_n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60718
--- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger ---
both types are essentially identical,
64 bits large, consist of two pointers, data, and vptr.
data points to the target structure, and vptr is the class type.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60756
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60750
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
-fno-ipa-pure-const "fixes" the issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60750
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #5)
> -fno-ipa-pure-const "fixes" the issue.
local pure const computes thrower() as noreturn. Adding noreturn to it in
the source reproduces the problem even wi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60750
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59429
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60718
--- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger ---
hmm,
gfc_build_class_symbol creates different types,
if a class has the allocatable, target or pointer attribute.
get_unique_hashed_string (tname, ts->u.derived);
if ((*as) && attr->allocatable)
spr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60746
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60746
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60750
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Patch posted and in testing - the underlying issue is present at least since
4.1 (didn't check 4.0 sources).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60657
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Apr 4 13:13:20 2014
New Revision: 209085
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209085&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/60657
* config/arm/predicates.md (const_int_I_operand):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60657
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60650
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60191
--- Comment #14 from edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Fri Apr 4 13:54:16 2014
New Revision: 209091
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209091&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-04-04 Bernd Edlinger
PR fortran/60191
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60757
--- Comment #3 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke ---
Created attachment 32544
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32544&action=edit
typescript with backtrace
It appears that some other epiphany patches I had in my tree I thought were
un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57949
--- Comment #10 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri Apr 4 14:05:08 2014
New Revision: 209095
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209095&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2014-04-04 Bill Schmidt
Backport from mainline r201750.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60757
--- Comment #4 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke ---
(In reply to Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke from comment #3)
> Created attachment 32544 [details]
> typescript with backtrace
>
> It appears that some other epiphany patches I had in my tree I thought were
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60640
--- Comment #12 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Apr 4 14:11:06 2014
New Revision: 209097
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209097&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-04-04 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/60640
* cgraph.h (cgraph_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60759
Bug ID: 60759
Summary: -Wlogical-op should perhaps warn about two-way
implicit conversions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56843
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri Apr 4 14:29:23 2014
New Revision: 209104
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209104&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2014-04-04 Bill Schmidt
Backport from mainline
2013-04-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60670
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59844
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri Apr 4 14:32:32 2014
New Revision: 209105
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209105&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2014-04-04 Bill Schmidt
Back port from mainline
2014-01
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59909
--- Comment #9 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri Apr 4 14:42:18 2014
New Revision: 209107
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209107&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc/testsuite]
2014-04-04 Bill Schmidt
Back port from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60759
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60760
Bug ID: 60760
Summary: arithmetic on null pointers should not be allowed in
constant expressions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accept
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60759
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60137
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri Apr 4 15:02:38 2014
New Revision: 209111
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209111&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2014-04-04 Bill Schmidt
Backport from mainline r207699.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60203
--- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri Apr 4 15:02:38 2014
New Revision: 209111
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209111&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2014-04-04 Bill Schmidt
Backport from mainline r207699.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58675
--- Comment #9 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri Apr 4 15:05:34 2014
New Revision: 209112
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209112&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-04-04 Bill Schmidt
Apply mainline r207798
2014-02-26 Ala
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57935
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri Apr 4 15:05:34 2014
New Revision: 209112
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209112&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-04-04 Bill Schmidt
Apply mainline r207798
2014-02-26 Ala
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57052
--- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri Apr 4 15:10:24 2014
New Revision: 209114
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209114&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-04-04 Bill Schmidt
Back port from trunk
2013-04-25 Alan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60032
--- Comment #10 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri Apr 4 15:10:24 2014
New Revision: 209114
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209114&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-04-04 Bill Schmidt
Back port from trunk
2013-04-25 Alan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60735
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri Apr 4 15:14:01 2014
New Revision: 209116
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209116&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2014-04-04 Bill Schmidt
Back port mainline subversion id 20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60670
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60670
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
> (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #2)
>> > --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
>> > Or the header needs to include all
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60761
Bug ID: 60761
Summary: Names of all function clones in g++ are "",
in both warnings and dumps
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60761
--- Comment #1 from Martin Jambor ---
This is because in dump_decl in gcc/cp/error.c there is:
case FUNCTION_DECL:
if (! DECL_LANG_SPECIFIC (t))
pp_string (pp, M_(""));
and the revision causing this clears DECL_LANG_SPECIFIC.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60155
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Dave,
The updated patch looks good. Please post it to gcc-patches for archival
purposes with a note that I approved it in BZ before installing the patch.
Thanks,
jeff
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60640
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60756
--- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson ---
Yes, this testcase works better with -fno-var-tracking-assignments.
It seems to be a mixed bag, though. Running the testsuite with this
argument causes 79 previously failing guality tests to pass, but
ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60743
--- Comment #7 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Fri Apr 4 15:47:45 2014
New Revision: 209119
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209119&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM/AArch64] Reduce divider reservation duration in Cortex-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60743
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60762
Bug ID: 60762
Summary: [ASAN] -fsanitize=address fails with LTO
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60758
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
--- Comment #9 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Fri Apr 4 16:10:07 2014
New Revision: 209121
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209121&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR debug/60655 - part 1
This is a partial fix for PR60655 whe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
--- Comment #10 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Partially fixed on trunk - need to handle the failure without -fdata-sections
and -g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763
Bug ID: 60763
Summary: ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60743
--- Comment #9 from Bernd Edlinger ---
The patch works for me.
Thanks for fixing this so quickly!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50871
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60756
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Yes, this testcase works better with -fno-var-tracking-assignments.
That's expected for the param-[123].c testcases.
> It seems to be a mixed bag, though. Running the testsuite with this
> argument causes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60760
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60760
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, we rely on that in initializer_list<>::end(), and clang rejects that.
I discussed that case with Jason and we think [expr.add] could be clarified -
do you have an existing issue number related to that?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58207
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59626
--- Comment #21 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Fri Apr 4 18:02:31 2014
New Revision: 209123
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209123&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/59626
* lto-cgraph.c (input_overwrite_node): Check that par
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60760
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> Yes, we rely on that in initializer_list<>::end(), and clang rejects that.
> I discussed that case with Jason and we think [expr.add] could be clarified
> -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60718
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44613
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Apr 4 19:36:00 2014
New Revision: 209125
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209125&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/44613
* semantics.c (add_stmt): Set STATEMENT_LIST_HAS_LABEL.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21113
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Apr 4 19:35:54 2014
New Revision: 209124
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209124&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/21113
* decl.c (decl_jump_unsafe): Consider variably-modified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 58207, which changed state.
Bug 58207 Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in
sort_constexpr_mem_initializers due to out of bounds vector access
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58207
What|Remov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58207
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58207
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Apr 4 20:11:47 2014
New Revision: 209128
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209128&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-04-04 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58207
* semantics
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60718
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #6)
> maybe the test case is wrong, passing one flavor of object to
> another?
> - class(node_type), target :: new_node
> + class(node_type), pointer, int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60620
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Apr 4 20:53:48 2014
New Revision: 209129
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209129&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/60620
* Makefile.def (dependencies): Make gnattools
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60620
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60718
--- Comment #9 from Bernd Edlinger ---
yes, thanks. When the test case is valid, then probably the IL is invalid.
append_node (struct list_type & restrict list, struct
__class_poly_list_Node_type & new_node)
{
if (list->head._data == 0B)
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39730
Javier Cruz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||javiercruz_94 at hotmail dot
com
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60155
--- Comment #13 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Fri Apr 4 22:25:51 2014
New Revision: 209134
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209134&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/60155
* gcse.c (record_set_data): New fun
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60155
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60764
Bug ID: 60764
Summary: Bogus -Wnonnull warning against constructors declared
with __attribute__ ((nonnull(1)))
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39730
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60765
Bug ID: 60765
Summary: Function attributes ignored for
pointer-to-member-function parameters
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60766
Bug ID: 60766
Summary: Wrong optimization with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60765
--- Comment #1 from patrick at parcs dot ath.cx ---
Oops, that warning is because I am currently compiling with G++ 4.8, which
doesn't implement returns_nonnull. Here's a better test case:
$ cat this.cc
struct Foo;
void foo (void (Foo::*) () __a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60764
--- Comment #1 from patrick at parcs dot ath.cx ---
I will try to resolve this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60765
--- Comment #2 from patrick at parcs dot ath.cx ---
I will try to resolve this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60766
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60767
Bug ID: 60767
Summary: [ICE] [c++11] [4.8.2] use of "using" inside template
causes failure in retreive_specialization
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60656
--- Comment #8 from Cong Hou ---
Author: congh
Date: Sat Apr 5 01:27:21 2014
New Revision: 209138
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209138&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-04-04 Cong Hou
PR tree-optimization/60656
* tree-vect-stmts.c (s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59474
asmwarrior changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asmwarrior at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60191
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
89 matches
Mail list logo