[Bug target/60247] AVR ATxmega C++ constructor startup in libgcc.S causes boot loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60247 --- Comment #3 from bobf at mrp3 dot com --- > --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay --- > Are you sure this is not already fixed by PR45263? Or in version 4.7 and > newer? it might be - I saw something in the ubuntu libc package [after filing t

[Bug target/60704] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.c:2156 with -flive-range-shrinkage -march=amdfam10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60704 --- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson --- Created attachment 32501 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32501&action=edit possible patch This seems to work for the testcase. Full testing still in progress.

[Bug target/45263] registers used in __do_global_ctors can get clobbered

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45263 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bobf at mrp3 dot com --- Comment #18 f

[Bug target/60247] AVR ATxmega C++ constructor startup in libgcc.S causes boot loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60247 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/44859] missed warning: returning reference to temporary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44859 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Apr 1 00:48:33 2014 New Revision: 208970 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208970&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/44859 * typeck.c (maybe_warn_about_returning_address_of_local

[Bug debug/55794] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/non-virtual-thunk.C -std=gnu++98 and -std=gnu++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55794 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 32502 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32502&action=edit .s file for hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 On hppa64-hp-hpux11.11, I don't see any debug information at all unless I add

[Bug libstdc++/60711] basic_ostringstream,basic_ostream,u16string,char16_t do not work together

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60711 --- Comment #10 from Jim Michaels --- learned about std::streambuf. when I went to use it (apparently a requirement in some cases and the only thing that works for std::ostream now), the whole streambuf heirarchy is protected except for std::fileb

[Bug preprocessor/60723] New: Line directives with incorrect system header flag

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723 Bug ID: 60723 Summary: Line directives with incorrect system header flag Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug preprocessor/60723] Line directives with incorrect system header flag

0.8.2] --disable-multilib --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-libgcj --disable-bootstrap --disable-static Thread model: posix gcc version 4.9.0 20140331 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug preprocessor/60723] Line directives with incorrect system header flag

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723 --- Comment #2 from Nicholas --- Created attachment 32504 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32504&action=edit Repro header

[Bug preprocessor/60723] Line directives with incorrect system header flag

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723 --- Comment #3 from Nicholas --- Created attachment 32505 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32505&action=edit Repro source

[Bug libstdc++/60724] std::ostream o; gives protected errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60724 --- Comment #1 from Jim Michaels --- Created attachment 32507 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32507&action=edit ostream-bug.cpp source code ostream-bug.cpp

[Bug libstdc++/60724] std::ostream o; gives protected errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60724 --- Comment #2 from Jim Michaels --- Created attachment 32508 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32508&action=edit errors in a file

[Bug libstdc++/60724] std::ostream o; gives protected errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60724 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/60617] [4.8 Regression] unable to find a register to spill in class 'LO_REGS'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60617 Venkataramanan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot co

[Bug fortran/60717] Wrong code with recursive procedure with unlimited polymorphic dummy argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60717 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 32509 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32509&action=edit Patch for the PR This patch bootstraps and regtests OK. I will tidy it up a bit tonight. I also wish to check if i

[Bug libstdc++/60711] basic_ostringstream,basic_ostream,u16string,char16_t do not work together

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60711 Jim Michaels changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug libstdc++/60711] basic_ostringstream,basic_ostream,u16string,char16_t do not work together

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60711 --- Comment #12 from Marc Glisse --- Before saying that there is a problem with libstdc++, did you try other implementations? clang++ with libc++ gives the same error. That's just not how streams are supposed to be used (pretend it is a pure virtu

[Bug libstdc++/60711] basic_ostringstream,basic_ostream,u16string,char16_t do not work together

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60711 Jim Michaels changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/60714] comments in template instantiation are interpreted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60714 --- Comment #2 from Jim Michaels --- I looked inside the class to derive that. maybe I made a mistake.

[Bug fortran/60495] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1994

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60495 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus --- Looks similar to PR60495; the patch there (committed) solved the ICE problem but the following issue remains (with both PRs): undefined reference to `__final_a_T2.2437'

[Bug libstdc++/60724] std::ostream o; gives protected errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60724 Jim Michaels changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Jim Michaels --

<    1   2