http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56910
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21857
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21664
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60589
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #2)
> Probably the right choice is to simply revert r208440.
Unrelated to the revert: GCC currently installs cilk (and also ssp) under both
./lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-lin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18079
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18079
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60553
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60419
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Slightly more reduced testcase:
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr60419.C2014-03-19 15:57:57.735114622 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr60419.C2014-03-20 10:20:56.245365852 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60419
--- Comment #14 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #13)
> The problem with both pasted testcases is that they don't crash 4.7.4.
4.8.3
of cou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60419
--- Comment #13 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
The problem with both pasted testcases is that they don't crash 4.7.4.
The attached one does.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
Bug ID: 60597
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE in df_refs_verify, at
df-scan.c:4323
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-checking
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60419
--- Comment #15 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
So, what about (crashes trunk and 4.8.3) :
class J
{
public:
J ();
virtual void m_fn1 (int &p1, int);
};
template class D
{
public:
virtual void m_fn1 (TDATA &) const;
void m_fn2 ()
{
TD
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60598
Bug ID: 60598
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at
dwarf2cfi.c:2239
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 32402
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32402&action=edit
autoreduced testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60598
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Reproducible with a cross from x86_64 to s390x-linux and
./cc1 -fpreprocessed camellia-set-decrypt-key.i -quiet -march=z196 -mtune=zEC12
-m64 -O2 -fpic
camellia-set-decrypt-key.c: In function ‘nettle_camelli
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60598
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60419
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I have:
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr60419.C2014-03-19 15:57:57.735114622 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr60419.C2014-03-20 11:13:58.933256068 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+// PR middle-end/60419
+//
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60599
Bug ID: 60599
Summary: [4.9 Regression] Testsuite's scan-module-absence no
longer works
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ah, but that one has undefined behavior in it (uninitialized i and j).
This one doesn't - -g -O2 -m32 again:
struct A
{
int foo () const;
int bar () const;
int a;
};
struct B
{
int foo ();
int bar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60563
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60577
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 32403
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32403&action=edit
alternative patch
This restores previous behavior by considering all coverage/profile related
counters to not al
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #29 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #28 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
>> > What we should do is break the test case into two test cases one for
>> > quad16 and
>> > the other for the rest. Then we XFAIL the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60600
Bug ID: 60600
Summary: ICE in ipa_get_indirect_edge_target_1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60580
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I'm not going to hack on this any time soon, so if aarch64 maintainers could
take it over, it would be appreciated.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60600
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
cc/ada/sem_dim.adb:1649:8: error: fallthru
edge crosses section boundary in bb 40
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.9.0 20140320 (experimental) [trunk revision 161655]
(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) GCC error:|
| verify_flow_info
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60601
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60563
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Created attachment 32405
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32405&action=edit
preprocessed file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60563
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Created attachment 32406
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32406&action=edit
asm compiled with -std=gnu++11 -fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions -save-temps
-fverbose-asm -dA
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60563
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Created attachment 32407
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32407&action=edit
asm compiled with -std=gnu++11 -fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions -save-temps
-fverbose-asm -dA -O1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60563
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Well - when I build the test -O0,O1,Os it passes.
Confirmed when running the test suite. However the following reduced test
/* { dg-do run { target hppa*-*-hpux* *-*-linux* *-*-gnu* powerpc*-*-darw
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59843
--- Comment #3 from Yufeng Zhang ---
This issue is related to the handling of vector of one double in the AArch64
backend. We don't have a corresponding type defined in ACLE (ARM C Language
Extension) the spec and backend is not able to handle it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60602
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60602
Bug ID: 60602
Summary: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr28865.c FAILs on Solaris
9/SPARC
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60602
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 32408
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32408&action=edit
assembler input
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Seems this is because invalid RTL sharing, debugging.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #30 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Is the following patch better?
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fmt_en.f902014-03-08
10:02:08.0 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fmt_en.f902014-03-20 16:34:03.0 +0100
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #31 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #30 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Is the following patch better?
It was a bit confusing at first glimpse, but fine.
Thanks.
Rainer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #32 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> It was a bit confusing at first glimpse, but fine.
???
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18079
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Patch queued for 5.0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg01068.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #33 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #32 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
>> It was a bit confusing at first glimpse, but fine.
>
> ???
I ran the test on Solaris 9 and 11 and looked at the resulting .sum
files.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60596
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 04:25:16AM +, patnel97269-gfortran at yahoo dot fr
wrote:
> Ok so if I understand well, for gfortran once the input_unit
> is closed, the unit number corresponding to input_unit can
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60599
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60568
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 20 16:05:41 2014
New Revision: 208706
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208706&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/60568
* config/i386/i386.c (x86_output_mi_thunk): Surround
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59176
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60568
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 20 16:10:33 2014
New Revision: 208707
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208707&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/60568
* config/i386/i386.c (x86_output_mi_thunk): Surroun
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60598
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60556
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
--- Comment #17 from Steve Ellc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60419
--- Comment #17 from Martin Jambor ---
Trunk patch posted to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg01078.html
4.8 will need some slightly modified variant, I'm still looking for the best
place to reset the flag there.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60568
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 20 16:34:32 2014
New Revision: 208717
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208717&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/60568
* config/i386/i386.c (x86_output_mi_thunk): Surroun
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60596
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60568
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60603
Bug ID: 60603
Summary: .debug_macinfo has wrong line numbers for built-in
macros
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60603
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60604
Bug ID: 60604
Summary: GCC incorrectly compiles s_csinh function on MIPS
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60528
--- Comment #4 from Steve Ellcey ---
I have created a new bug for the incorrect csinh results and included a cutdown
test case. It looks like a GCC optimization bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60604
I think this bug should stay
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #34 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I ran the test on Solaris 9 and 11 and looked at the resulting .sum
> files. Seeing the Unsupported rounding entries on Solaris 11 (any
> platform without the rounding issue actually) seemed strange
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60598
--- Comment #4 from Richard Henderson ---
Created attachment 32411
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32411&action=edit
proposed patch
This appears to fix the bug.
This code has a distinctly weird look to it. A doloop insn that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52466
--- Comment #11 from Bernd Schmidt ---
This patch appears not to have been posted on gcc-patches which is required for
all checkins, and none of the bugzillas seem to say who approved it. I noticed
it because gcc/configure wasn't properly regenera
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52466
--- Comment #12 from Jon Beniston ---
(In reply to Bernd Schmidt from comment #11)
> This patch appears not to have been posted on gcc-patches which is required
> for all checkins, and none of the bugzillas seem to say who approved it.
Strange.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60567
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Summary|lto1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60567
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus ---
The gcc/configure check has the following comment:
# Require GNU ld or gold 2.21+ for plugin support by default.
# Allow -fuse-linker-plugin to enable plugin support in GNU gold 2.20.
In the driver th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58622
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55906
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Mar 20 19:42:00 2014
New Revision: 208732
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208732&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-20 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/60543
PR fortran/60
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60283
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Mar 20 19:42:15 2014
New Revision: 208733
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208733&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-20 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/60543
PR fortran/60
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60283
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Mar 20 19:42:00 2014
New Revision: 208732
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208732&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-20 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/60543
PR fortran/60
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Mar 20 19:42:15 2014
New Revision: 208733
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208733&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-20 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/60543
PR fortran/60
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59843
Yufeng Zhang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|yufeng at gcc dot g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60572
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 20 19:45:09 2014
New Revision: 208734
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208734&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/60572
* init.c (build_zero_init_1): Ignore fields with error_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60283
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 20 19:47:09 2014
New Revision: 208735
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208735&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/60597
* ira.c (adjust_cleared_regs): Call copy_rtx on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53793
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53246
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60589
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Mar 20 19:50:51 2014
New Revision: 208736
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208736&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-20 Tobias Burnus
PR other/60589
Reverted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60568
--- Comment #13 from David Kredba ---
-m32 compiled fine but 64 bit gave me (rev. 208729):
/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -flto=4 -fuse-linker-plugin -O2 -ggdb -pipe
-march=core2 -mtune=core2 -flto=4 -fuse-linker-plugin -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-O
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60572
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60568
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Definitely unrelated, please file a different bug, and if at all possible try
to reduce it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56775
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60598
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32411|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56963
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57715
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60568
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678
--- Comment #53 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #41)
> markus@x4 tmp % g++ -flto -c -O2 test.ii && nm test.o | grep
> _ZN8Calligra6Sheets5qHashERKNS0_10ConditionsE
> U _ZN8Calligra6Sheets5qHashERKNS0_1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60574
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59295
--- Comment #1 from Paul Pluzhnikov ---
Still broken in current head (r208736).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60605
Bug ID: 60605
Summary: incorrect diagosis of default template argument for
function declaration inside class template member
function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51747
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merril
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60563
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe ---
sadly, this seems to be a ld64 bug - present when using uncompressed EH (which
is the default for GCC on darwin).
If I manually enable compressed EH (which is the default now for the platform)
the test passes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60599
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Mar 20 23:16:57 2014
New Revision: 208739
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208739&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-21 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/60599
* lib/gcc-dg.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60599
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60580
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59295
--- Comment #2 from Paul Pluzhnikov ---
This appears to be a very old warning.
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg01123.html
99 matches
Mail list logo
