http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60571
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 19 07:18:46 2014
New Revision: 208675
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208675&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/60571
* lto.c (wait_for_child): Define WCONTINUED if not defi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60571
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60054
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60332
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59114
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60579
Bug ID: 60579
Summary: Segmentation fault on variadic 'using' within variadic
template class
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60566
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Created attachment 32387
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32387&action=edit
unreduced testcase
I've narrowed it down to a single file. Can't say I understand
the issue fully yet.
Bad
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60566
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
--- part_good.s 2014-03-19 08:57:10.100342064 +0100
+++ part_bad.s 2014-03-19 08:56:50.134141664 +0100
@@ -13466,49 +13466,10 @@
.text
.LHOTE151:
.section.text.unlikely
+
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60579
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60580
Bug ID: 60580
Summary: aarch64 generates wrong code for __attribute__
((optimize("no-omit-frame-pointer")))
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60569
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60569
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54561
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson ---
(In reply to Matthieu Patou from comment #3)
> volatile proto_tree *tmptree = NULL;
Try
proto_tree * volatile tmptree = NULL;
It's the variable itself that needs to be volatile, not the memory it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60566
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60581
Bug ID: 60581
Summary: gcc doesn't isssue a strict aliasing warning on a code
that seems to break it
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60559
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 19 09:13:32 2014
New Revision: 208676
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208676&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/60559
* vectorizable_mask_load_store): Replace
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59543
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 19 09:22:15 2014
New Revision: 208677
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208677&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-19 Richard Biener
PR lto/59543
* lto-streamer-in.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60582
Bug ID: 60582
Summary: gfortran.dg/fmt_en.f90 FAILs on Solaris 9/x86
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fort
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59543
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60582
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #26 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #24 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Rainer,
>
> can you test the following patch?
>
> --- _clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fmt_en.f902014-03-04
> 17:51:04.0 +01
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #27 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #25 from Jerry DeLisle ---
> (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #21)
>> > We can xfail the test case if we are certain of the problem.
>>
>> What I don't see i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54316
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
That would be very welcome, thanks, Howard.
We hope to complete the C++11 library for the next major release after 4.9, but
there's still quite a lot to do. I haven't even analysed what we need to do to
add
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60576
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I can't reproduce it, in any case, this seems to have been broken before as
well
and starting with 208668 I get valgrind error about memcpy with overlapping
arguments.
The bug seems in:
class.5._data.dim[0 ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60576
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60569
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
struct A
{
void foo ();
struct
{
int i;
void bar () { i = 0; }
} s;
};
void A::foo () { s.bar (); }
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60574
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
--- Comment #1 from Rich
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60572
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60581
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias, diagnostic
Status|UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60577
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60576
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
at's dim array is created by:
#6 0x006fc242 in gfc_get_array_descriptor_base (dimen=2, codimen=0,
restricted=true, akind=GFC_ARRAY_ALLOCATABLE)
at ../../gcc/fortran/trans-types.c:1754
where the di
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60419
--- Comment #11 from Martin Jambor ---
Good job reducing the testcase to something this small!
Anyway, Jakub's analysis of what is going on is still correct and all
the high level decisions that we do are IMHO correct too. The
invocation of symt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60577
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at acm dot org
--- Comment #2 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57703
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
This is just totally broken and not supportable with LTO. We'd need to amend
toplevel asm syntax to list defined and used symbols, but that doesn't fix
existing uses.
The proper fix is to excempt these file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60583
Bug ID: 60583
Summary: Garbled data, "temporary bound ... only persists until
the constructor exits", fine with clang++
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60567
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60577
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
So - if we delay marking any decl addressable during IPA reference recording
then we need an IPA pass that computes whether any of the taken IPA_REF_ADDR
may leak into the IL. We need to do that conservative
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60584
Bug ID: 60584
Summary: std::vector::emplace_back(...) use move constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60584
--- Comment #1 from Ruslan Mullakhmetov ---
Created attachment 32391
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32391&action=edit
compiler output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60577
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> Which leaves the possibility of more cleverly instrumenting the program
> in the first place ...
Which shouldn't be so hard as we are in SSA form and have loop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60585
Bug ID: 60585
Summary: Virtual function related memory access errors with
multiple virtual inheritance
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60567
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Works for me - any more specifics? Host/target?
gcc version 4.9.0 20140319, r208679.
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
CentOS 6.5, glibc-2.12-1.132, binut
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60569
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Mar 19 12:25:04 2014
New Revision: 208681
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208681&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/60569
* ubsan.c (ubsan_type_descriptor): Check that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60569
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60577
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 32393
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32393&action=edit
hack
Like this (hack alert). Applies store motion one level for a restricted set
of loops. Requires us to add
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60586
Bug ID: 60586
Summary: [Cilk+] Parameters evaluation happens inside spawn
worker
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60580
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60553
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
I've posted the patches but I'm curious if the 2nd change alone helps enough.
The first is somewhat handwaving (because we also have type_non_common which
breaks the argument of the former).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60583
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60549
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60583
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
As this is DR1288 it's a dup of PR50025
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025
--- Comment #22 from Jonathan Wakely ---
For the record, I think r207164 fixed this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60559
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60583
--- Comment #3 from andreaskem at web dot de ---
Thank you.
I looked around but did not find those reports. Sorry for that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60584
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59749
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60585
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60587
Bug ID: 60587
Summary: debug-mode -std=c++11 vector::insert(pos, begin, end)
dereferences begin too eagerly
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60588
Bug ID: 60588
Summary: AVR target does not support init_priority attribute
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60566
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #2)
> --- part_good.s 2014-03-19 08:57:10.100342064 +0100
> +++ part_bad.s 2014-03-19 08:56:50.134141664 +0100
> - .quad _ZN6KParts13ReadWritePartD1Ev
> -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59749
--- Comment #4 from Martin Husemann ---
Yes - I'm still trying to reduce it to a reasonable test case, but in general
it works - so I am confused big time.
Also Julio (the ATF author) claims the same test works on FreeBSD with a very
similar compi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60589
Bug ID: 60589
Summary: Parallel install fails
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60590
Bug ID: 60590
Summary: Can't recreate the same executable in testsuite
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: te
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60589
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||y.gribov at samsung dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54316
--- Comment #8 from Howard Hinnant ---
Here:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/n1862.html#27.4.4%20-%20Class%20template%20basic_ios
is a good list of what needs to be done. It is an old paper, so it needs to be
cross-check
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60566
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #3)
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #2)
> > --- part_good.s 2014-03-19 08:57:10.100342064 +0100
> > +++ part_bad.s 2014-03-19 08:56:50.134141664 +
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60332
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
I'm adding it to the testsuite.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60576
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.9.0 |4.8.3
Summary|[4.9 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60553
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 19 15:37:28 2014
New Revision: 208682
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208682&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-19 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/60553
* tree-core.h (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60566
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #4)
> If I compile part.cpp with a compiler _after_ r208573 and link the
> library and install it, Okular shows a popup "Unable to find the Okular
> component".
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60566
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Looking at the library, the only difference are four additional
symbols in the good version:
_ZThn16_N6KParts13ReadWritePartD0Ev
_ZThn16_N6KParts13ReadWritePartD1Ev
_ZTv0_n24_N6KParts13ReadWritePartD0Ev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60587
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60591
Bug ID: 60591
Summary: Report enum conversions as part of Wconversion
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60332
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Mar 19 15:48:39 2014
New Revision: 208684
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208684&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-19 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/60332
* g++.dg/cpp1y/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60133
mshawcroft at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60566
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #4)
> part.ii is part of a library called libkparts.so.4.12.3.
> When I compile part.cpp with a compiler before r208573 and link the
> library (all other objects
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60568
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60553
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
Second part of suggested patch is sufficient.
ps auxf:
marxin 20293 0.0 0.0 8604 1200 pts/0S17:27 0:00 | \_
c++ -Wl,-z,now -Wl,-z,relro -pthread -Wl,-z,noexecstack -fPIC -pie -L.
-Wl,-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60590
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Mar 19 16:59:18 2014
New Revision: 208685
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208685&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Log environment variables in set_ld_library_path_env_vars
GNU linker
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60590
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60556
--- Comment #14 from reed kotler ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #13)
> (In reply to reed kotler from comment #12)
> >
> > Do you know where the original line was that made it fail in the .ii?
>
> Yes:
> # 227 "/home/rkotler/llvm_tru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60556
--- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu ---
This is related to PR 54037.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60566
--- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #7)
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #4)
> > part.ii is part of a library called libkparts.so.4.12.3.
> > When I compile part.cpp with a compiler be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60592
Bug ID: 60592
Summary: std::array is unable to be brace/universally
initialized
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60592
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#1467
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60592
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
If it's that DR, then this is a dup of my PR51747
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60568
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Can you please post complete command line that triggers the bug, as outlined in
[1]? Something like:
g++ <... options ...> -fpreprocessed TEncSbac.ii
Please also use -march= instead of -march=native. You can s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51747
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60593
Bug ID: 60593
Summary: ICE with deferred length variable in FORALL
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60592
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51747
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mjbshaw at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60593
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.9.0
--- Comment #1 from kargl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60567
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60566
--- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Running nm on all my libs shows:
...
kde4/notepadpart.so
U _ZThn16_N6KParts13ReadWritePartD0Ev
...
kde4/okularpart.so
U _ZThn16_N6KParts13ReadWritePartD0Ev
...
libkatepa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60556
--- Comment #16 from Steve Ellcey ---
It looks like this is a bug in convert_move when POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED
is false. If unsignedp is false we call emit_store_flag to get 'fill_value'.
Arguments 3 and 4 (op0 and op1 in emit_store_flag) are:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60593
--- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl ---
Here's a reduced testcase that appears to lead to
the same ICE without the ISO C binding detour.
function C2FChar(j, s) result(res)
implicit none
integer, intent(in) :: j
character(len=:), pointer, int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60566
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #9)
> Running nm on all my libs shows:
> ...
> kde4/notepadpart.so
> U _ZThn16_N6KParts13ReadWritePartD0Ev
> ...
> kde4/okularpart.so
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60568
--- Comment #3 from David Kredba ---
Without lto it compiles fine.
It is Gentoo x86/x86_64 enabled package.
I am going to attach all the ii files, thank you.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60566
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60593
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
