http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60384
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60387
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60398
Bug ID: 60398
Summary: [4.9 Regression] FAIL: obj-c++.dg/invalid-method-2.mm
-fgnu-runtime (test for errors, line 10)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60243
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60243
>
> --- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka ---
> Created attachment 32244
> --> http://gcc.g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60392
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60383
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Summary|[4.8 Regression] I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60382
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60381
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60379
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60374
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60375
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60376
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60389
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60386
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60385
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60398
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60376
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P3
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60398
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60395
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto, wrong-code
Status|UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60395
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60398
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Looks like this is caused by r208040, ...
There was no testsuite ChangeLog entry, I *did* look for recent testsuite
changes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60398
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 3 09:36:44 2014
New Revision: 208270
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208270&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR objc++/60398
* obj-c++.dg/invalid-method-2.mm: Adjust dg-error re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60398
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60396
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |libstdc++
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60361
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54779
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28323|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54779
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ---
Results (ms) for SPARKSkein on x86-64 at -O3 -gnatn -gnatp:
Before:
DT_Min is 36
Minis15.21
Median is15.22
After:
DT_Min is 36
Minis14.56
Median is14.58
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60399
Bug ID: 60399
Summary: constexpr ctor that does not init an attribute should
be rejected but isn't
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60367
--- Comment #4 from rob.desbois at gmail dot com ---
The problem only seems to occur when using the pattern "= {}" to default the
parameter; "= foo{}" and "= foo()" don't seem to provoke the differing
addresses.
I have confirmed that member data s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60400
Bug ID: 60400
Summary: ICE with trigraphs
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60400
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 32251
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32251&action=edit
gcc48-pr60400-test.patch
Testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60400
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60400
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 3 11:12:22 2014
New Revision: 208272
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208272&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR preprocessor/60400
* c-c++-common/cpp/pr60400.c: New test.
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60367
--- Comment #5 from rob.desbois at gmail dot com ---
The following is a side-by-side diff of the disassembly of the incorrect
version vs. a correct version (defaulting the parameter with = foo{}). The
object foo has a single member of type char ini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59859
Bug 59859 depends on bug 58028, which changed state.
Bug 58028 Summary: [4.9 Regression] Several failures in libgomp.graphite after
revision 200946
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58028
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58028
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54094
Bug 54094 depends on bug 58028, which changed state.
Bug 58028 Summary: [4.9 Regression] Several failures in libgomp.graphite after
revision 200946
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58028
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58028
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60370
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #4)
> This patch doesn't work, so it may not be a code ordering issue after all.
I think it *is* an ordering issue after all, and indeed your patch seems to fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58595
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60382
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
The issue is that in vectorizable_reduction we compute double_reduc in a wrong
way:
if (nested_cycle)
{
def_bb = gimple_bb (reduc_def_stmt);
def_stmt_loop = def_bb->loop_father;
def_a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58479
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Alex, your thoughts on this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59746
Bud Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bdavis at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60381
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58595
--- Comment #5 from Meador Inge ---
Created attachment 32253
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32253&action=edit
Work in progress patch.
Yeah, I am came to the same conclusion after making that comment that removing
the asserts
Using gcc-4.7.2 compiled to /usr/local
The following fails:
echo "int main(){}" > hello.c
gcc hello.c -fopenmp
..with a message that libgomp.spec cannot be found
editing the output of gcc -dumpspecs:
include(libgomp.spec) -> include(/usr/local/lib/libgomp.spec)
include(libitm.spec) -> include(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60381
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
This seems to be due to r208220.
One problem I see is that when var-tracking.c calls cselib_preserve_only_values
+ cselib_reset_table, the latter clears n_useless_values (and
n_useless_debug_values) and drops
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58595
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58595
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Meador Inge from comment #5)
> Created attachment 32253 [details]
> Work in progress patch.
>
> Yeah, I am came to the same conclusion after making that comment that
> removing the asserts is a b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58595
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 32254
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32254&action=edit
gcc49-pr58595-2.patch
So what about this variant?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401
Bug ID: 60401
Summary: stdlib.h does not provide abs(long) overload
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libst
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58595
--- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> Created attachment 32254 [details]
> gcc49-pr58595-2.patch
>
> So what about this variant?
I'll give this a bootstrap and test run, thanks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60387
--- Comment #2 from Nistor, Mihail-Marian ---
More details about how to reproduce the first problem.
By using the gcc version - GNU C 4.8.1 20130531 (Wed Sep 4 08:04:01 CDT 2013)
I have defined a local variable (vf1) that has a vector resister as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60399
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58638
Fredrik Nyström changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fredrik at lysator dot liu.se
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60402
Bug ID: 60402
Summary: const overload with variadics declared ambiguous
according to standard (may be related to bug 58156)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60402
--- Comment #1 from Nate McNamara ---
Created attachment 32256
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32256&action=edit
preprocessed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60402
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60361
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60361
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60370
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to janus from comment #5)
> However, it also seems to introduce another ordering issue: In particular
> the bounds of 'b' are now set as
>
> b.dim[1].lbound = 1;
> b.dim[1].ubound = (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58880
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[OOP] ICE on valid with |[4.9 Regression] [OOP] ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58880
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I guess it's fair to say that the ICE is technically a regression.
The test in comment 0 compiles with r199394 to r199408. The Ice starts at
r199409.
So it is a real regression within 4.9.0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57643
--- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Mon Mar 3 22:13:28 2014
New Revision: 208295
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208295&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2013-06-20 Torvald Riegel
* query.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48587
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jb at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52036
Matheus Izvekov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mizvekov at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60403
Bug ID: 60403
Summary: fatal error, system.ads not formatted correctly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ad
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60155
--- Comment #10 from John David Anglin ---
Bah, doesn't fix bug:
dave@mx3210:~/gnu/gcc/objdir$ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc/ -g -O2 -Wall -Wpointer-arith
-Wuninitialized -Wsign-compare -Wformat-security -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess
-Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-unused-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60387
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Nistor, Mihail-Marian from comment #2)
> Please let me know if you need more information to reproduce the second
> problem.
Yes please provide the preprocesed source and the exact options you use
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60148
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Mar 4 04:33:40 2014
New Revision: 208302
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208302&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-03 Jerry DeLisle
PR libfortran/60148
* io/inquire.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60148
--- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Mar 4 05:46:06 2014
New Revision: 208303
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208303&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-03 Jerry DeLisle
PR libfortran/60148
* gfortran.dg/
4.9.0 20140303 (experimental) [trunk revision 208268] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -flto -O1 -c fn1.c
$ gcc-trunk -flto -O1 -c fn2.c
$ gcc-trunk -flto -O1 -c main.c
$ gcc-trunk -flto -O0 fn1.o fn2.o main.o
$ a.out
1
$
$ gcc-4.8.2 -flto -O1 -c fn1.c
$ gcc-4.8.2 -flto -O1 -c fn2.c
$ gcc-4.8.2 -flto
/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.9.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20140303 (experimental) [trunk revision 208268] (GCC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60406
Bug ID: 60406
Summary: reflect.go:test13reflect2 test failure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
74 matches
Mail list logo
