http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60041
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59831
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon Feb 3 20:41:30 2014
New Revision: 207439
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207439&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/59831
* g++.dg/ipa/devirt-24.C: New testcase.
* ipa-cp.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53902
--- Comment #6 from Karel Gardas ---
Hello,
just attempted to build GCC 4.8.2 on Solaris 11.0, bootstraping GCC is:
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/gcc/4.5/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.11/4.5.2/lto-wrapper
Targ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60038
--- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> Created attachment 32021 [details]
> gcc49-pr60038.patch
>
> This seems to work for me on glibc 2.17, Uros, can you please try it on your
> CentOS 5?
The patch wa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60041
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58602
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Feb 3 21:55:36 2014
New Revision: 207441
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207441&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR gcov-profile/58602
* gcc/gcov-io.c (gcov_open): Open with trun
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58602
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59882
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
Hmm, get_binfo_at_offset bug again, this time it is confused by base with 0
offset. I am looking into it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60048
Bug ID: 60048
Summary: scan-assembler results depend on '--with-arch='
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: te
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60041
--- Comment #3 from qRoC ---
cout
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54305
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59924
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson ---
Author: rth
Date: Mon Feb 3 23:13:08 2014
New Revision: 207442
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207442&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-opt/59924
* tree-ssa-uninit.c (push_to_worklist): Don't r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59924
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59924
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 4 00:46:42 2014
New Revision: 207446
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207446&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/59924
* gcc.dg/pr59924.c: New test.
Added:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60033
Adam Butcher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abutcher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59469
--- Comment #39 from Jan Hubicka ---
Ha, good catch. Forced_by_abi is a flag that needs to be merged. You do not
want to set force_output as your patch does, just forced_by_abi. I will test
the patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60033
Adam Butcher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59948
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
The code in fold-const for nonzero check is really broken. I have somewerhe
WIP symtab patch for doing this, but it is not completely trivial to hook it
into fold-const when symtab is not built yet - just as in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60033
--- Comment #5 from Adam Butcher ---
Turns out that the above breaks the generic lambda variadic testcase:
auto vglambda = [](auto printer) {
return [=](auto&& ... ts) { // OK: ts is a function parameter pack
printer(std::forward(ts).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59948
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
About the inlining issue, am not really sure how to handle this without
iterating optimizers and inliner like llvm does (Maxim had patch for this).
I wonder if we can't just declare the operator () always_inlin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60038
--- Comment #14 from Kostya Serebryany ---
Landed upstream:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=200733
Note that the patch is slightly different from Jakub's: it uses
memory_order_relaxed.
My understanding is that now is no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60049
Bug ID: 60049
Summary: Right and left shift undefined behavior not an error
in a constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59469
--- Comment #40 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Tue Feb 4 05:50:18 2014
New Revision: 207449
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207449&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/59469
* lto-symtab.c (lto_cgraph_replace_node, lto_varpool_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59831
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
Hopefully fixed now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59831
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60050
Bug ID: 60050
Summary: Build failure on MinGW64
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59918
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||59947
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59882
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Tue Feb 4 06:28:22 2014
New Revision: 207451
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207451&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/59882
* tree.c (get_binfo_at_offset): Do not get confused by
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59882
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|ipa |c++
--- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka ---
J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60043
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57350
--- Comment #9 from David Krauss ---
Whoa, there's a nasty bug there, if alignment > space.
inline void *align( std::size_t alignment, std::size_t size,
void *&ptr, std::size_t &space ) {
std::uintptr_t pn = reinterpret_ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60051
Bug ID: 60051
Summary: [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with auto and array
initialization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60051
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60052
Bug ID: 60052
Summary: [c++1y] ICE with auto as member function parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60043
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
And indeed, if we change the test case to
int foo (long long *a, short *b, int n)
{
int k = *b + 1000;
*a = (long long) (n * 100);
return k;
}
then we get the desired anti-dependency because alia
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60053
Bug ID: 60053
Summary: [c++1y] ICE with auto as member template function
parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60054
Bug ID: 60054
Summary: [c++1y] ICE with auto* cast
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60038
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 4 07:37:44 2014
New Revision: 207452
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207452&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/60038
* sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux_libcdep.cc: I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60038
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59469
--- Comment #41 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
That doesn't fix this bug, because the symbol still gets optimized away with
-O3:
markus@x4 tmp % g++ -flto -fPIC -shared -fno-rtti -O3 BasicBlock.ii Function.ii
markus@x4 tmp % nm a.out | c++filt| gre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59469
--- Comment #42 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Ah, I see what's wrong. The following patch fixes the issue:
diff --git a/gcc/lto/lto-partition.c b/gcc/lto/lto-partition.c
index 6b2d488ed090..bc192d0467b3 100644
--- a/gcc/lto/lto-partition.c
+++ b/g
101 - 142 of 142 matches
Mail list logo