http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59963
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Jan 31 08:13:50 2014
New Revision: 207335
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207335&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/59963
c-family/
* c-common.c (add_atomic_size_parameter): Pa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59963
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60004
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60003
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ah, I see what's going on. eliminate_unnecessary_calls in dce calls
clear_special_calls. Before my patch, __builtin_setjmp lowering would add a
dummy non-local label to the function, so that while dce would
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59737
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Valgrind shows:
==26377== Invalid read of size 4
==26377==at 0x7D91EE: fold_stmt_1(gimple_stmt_iterator*, bool)
(gimple-fold.c:1186)
==26377==by 0x997F29: fold_marked_statements(int, pointer_set_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60003
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 31997
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31997&action=edit
gcc49-pr60003-1.patch
Untested quick hack to set cfun->has_nonlocal_label, seems to work on this
testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55260
--- Comment #11 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Martin, can you take a look?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59906
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60003
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Ah, I see what's going on. eliminate_unnecessary_calls in dce calls
> clear_special_calls. Before my patch, __builtin_setjmp lowering would add a
> dummy non-local label to the function, so that while dce
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60003
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 31998
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31998&action=edit
gcc49-pr60003-2.patch
Untested variant which makes __builtin_setjmp_receiver a returns twice
function.
For some s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60003
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 31999
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31999&action=edit
gcc49-pr60003-3.patch
Untested third variant, which just makes sure cfun->calls_setjmp is set even
for __builtin_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60003
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #4)
> > So, either e.g. tree-cfg.c could just set cfun->has_nonlocal_label when it
> > sees a __builtin_setjmp_receiver (or say gimple-low.c when lowering
> > __builtin_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60003
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Ok, so you prefer the first patch? Now to write some comment explaining
> why...
Yes, I'm very fond of one-liners. :-) You can say that the label taken by
__builtin_setjmp is treated as a non-local label
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59998
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59993
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerald at pfeifer dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
--- Comment #2 from Paulo J. Matos ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> I guess pure co-incidence
If I understand you correctly you think that the patch I mentioned is not the
culprit but simply triggered this to happen. It might be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60003
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60001
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60003
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59595
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59765
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58470
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59774
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59727
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59385
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59836
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58470
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60005
Bug ID: 60005
Summary: std::wcstod() doesn't work properly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59385
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59393
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|mips16 |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59393
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59561
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59575
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59082
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59626
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59723
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59646
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|error-recovery |rejects-valid
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59737
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59762
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59765
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59776
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59811
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59906
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59923
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59913
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59918
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59924
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Component|other
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59927
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-*
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59947
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59990
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59992
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Component|t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59811
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Dunno what to limit there though.
BTW, the 1000 default for sccvn-max-alias-queries-per-access param was some
carefully chosen value, e.g. does the test that was fixed by the addition of
the param fail if it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59811
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59811
>
> --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Dunno what to limit there though.
>
> BTW, th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59990
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59990
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jan 31 11:54:26 2014
New Revision: 207338
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207338&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-31 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/59990
* builtins.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59990
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
--- Comment #4 from Paulo J. Matos ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> Yes, I think that the IV choice merely shows that we miss to optimize the
> extension - which would be somewhere in the RTL opt pipeline.
Makes sense. My first
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59385
--- Comment #8 from Julian Taylor ---
>
> > also gcc 4.9 still documents -ffp-contract=fast as being the default
> while
> > it is apparently not anymore.
>
> it's the default unless you override it with -std=c99 (always use
> -std=gnu99).
>
it w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59410
--- Comment #32 from Yury Gribov ---
Jakub has posted patch which may fix this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg02044.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60006
Bug ID: 60006
Summary: [4.9 Regression] FAIL:
c-c++-common/cilk-plus/CK/fib_no_(return|sync).c -O3
with -m32 after r207231 on x86_64-apple-darwin13
Product: gcc
V
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60007
Bug ID: 60007
Summary: preprocessor aborts with internal error when
redefining a flag set by -D option
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59985
--- Comment #13 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> does it work if you configure with --without-build-config? (thus, disable
> bootstrap-debug)
Just for the recores, this configure option produces a usable gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60008
Bug ID: 60008
Summary: x86_64: Segmentation fault if compiled with
-fcall-saved-rdi -O2 --coverage
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60007
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59935
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lutzwei at gmx dot de
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60002
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60002
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60008
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60008
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
E.g. -fcall-saved-rdi option is ABI changing option, so you'd need to have
everything (from libc, libgcov, libgcc, libstdc++, ...) built that way.
Furthermore, I don't think we consider this case e.g. to disa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59952
--- Comment #11 from Yukhin Kirill ---
(In reply to Yukhin Kirill from comment #9)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> > Prerelease samples shouldn't count, people using those just can avoid using
> > -march=haswell and use -march=ivyb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59980
--- Comment #3 from Jason ---
C-style enums decay to the underlying integer representation, this particular
behaviour helps complicate considering how any modification to the diagnostic
might be implemented. Enum-classes are not without their own
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59646
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59980
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jason from comment #3)
> C-style enums decay to the underlying integer representation, this
> particular behaviour helps complicate considering how any modification to
> the diagnostic might be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Apart from expand there is the redundant-extension-elimination, ree.c.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60009
Bug ID: 60009
Summary: g++ allows copy-initialization of an array of class
type from a non-braced string literal
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60008
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60006
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
--- Comment #6 from Paulo J. Matos ---
humm, ree is no good because by then we missed already the generation of zero
overhead loops. Do you think this is something that could be added to expand?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59646
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 31 15:20:12 2014
New Revision: 207346
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207346&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/59646
* call.c (convert_like_real) [ck_aggr]: Set TARGET_EXPR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57043
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 31 15:20:05 2014
New Revision: 207345
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207345&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/57043
* pt.c (fn_type_unification): Don't do DEDUCE_EXACT che
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57043
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 31 15:21:13 2014
New Revision: 207347
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207347&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/57043
* pt.c (fn_type_unification): Don't do DEDUCE_EXACT che
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59646
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59646
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 31 15:21:20 2014
New Revision: 207348
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207348&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/59646
* call.c (convert_like_real) [ck_aggr]: Set TARGET_EXPR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57915
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 32001
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32001&action=edit
gcc49-pr57915.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57915
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60010
Bug ID: 60010
Summary: AArch64: sigsegv in cc1plus using pch without defining
TRY_EMPTY_VM_SPACE
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55800
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||conradsand.arma at gmail dot
com
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59994
Bug 59994 depends on bug 55800, which changed state.
Bug 55800 Summary: Link failure with thread_local in unnamed namespace
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55800
What|Removed |Added
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59364
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resoluti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55800
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60010
--- Comment #1 from Kyle McMartin ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058991
Just FYI, this is RHBZ#1058991.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57043
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 31 15:55:46 2014
New Revision: 207355
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207355&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/57043
* pt.c (fn_type_unification): Don't do DEDUCE_EXACT che
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57043
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59082
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jan 31 16:22:53 2014
New Revision: 207359
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207359&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-01-31 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/59082
* class.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59082
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo