http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59916
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59916
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 29 17:13:01 2014
New Revision: 207271
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207271&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/59916
* optimize.c (maybe_thunk_body): Build a RETURN_EXPR fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46333
--- Comment #26 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Sergey from comment #23)
> cc -V:
> cc: Sun C 5.9 SunOS_i386 Patch 124868-01 2007/07/12
That thing belongs in a museum.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59617
--- Comment #2 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Wed Jan 29 17:35:19 2014
New Revision: 207274
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207274&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/
PR target/59617
* gcc.target/i386/avx512f-gath
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59981
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46333
--- Comment #27 from Jay ---
The patch looks very very reasonable
imho. I had a few reasonable patches.
- Jay
On Jan 29, 2014, at 9:25 AM, "glisse at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46333
>
> --- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59987
Bug ID: 59987
Summary: [C++11]: Missing ios_base::hexfloat format specifier
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58674
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Jan 29 17:54:51 2014
New Revision: 207275
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207275&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-01-29 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58674
* pt.c (ins
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59968
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31974|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58846
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Jan 29 17:58:37 2014
New Revision: 207276
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207276&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-01-29 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58846
* decl.c (g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58846
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58674
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58567
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59988
Bug ID: 59988
Summary: Failing to specialize template class
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59988
--- Comment #1 from tom at failproof dot be ---
Created attachment 31985
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31985&action=edit
Command-line output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59988
--- Comment #2 from tom at failproof dot be ---
Created attachment 31986
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31986&action=edit
Problematic source file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55650
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Author: trippels
Date: Wed Jan 29 18:36:42 2014
New Revision: 207277
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207277&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-29 Markus Trippelsdorf
Backport from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55650
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59807
--- Comment #4 from Andrey H. ---
Thanks Jonathan, I followed your suggestion regarding os_defines.h, recompiled
the whole mingw-w64 toolchain and can confirm that it helps. But doesn't it
meant that it should be fixed in GCC sources itself (I mea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21609
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
No matter where I put the deprecated attribute or how many times I instantiate
the class template I can't get any deprecated warning. (PR 33911, but it
usually warns if you instantiate the type twice.)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59807
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, the copy in the sources needs to be fixed. Does mingw-w64 always use
winpthread?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59989
Bug ID: 59989
Summary: ICE when a template parameter pack is explicitly
specified for a function template and provides a
complete argument list for a template
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54440
Richard Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58843
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59807
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59990
Bug ID: 59990
Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 regression] incorrect memcpy optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58466
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59989
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59956
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59968
--- Comment #19 from H.J. Lu ---
For
---
int
foo1 (int x, int y)
{
x &= 1 << y;
return x != 0;
}
---
combine fails to try
(set (reg:CCZ 17 flags)
(compare:CCZ (and:SI (lshiftrt:SI (reg/v:SI 88 [ x ])
(subreg:QI (reg/v:SI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59883
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
The self-recursion testcase is wrong, as can be seen by the following testcase:
#include
struct A
{
virtual int foo (void) {return foo()+1;}
};
struct B: public A
{
virtual int foo (void) {return 1;}
};
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21609
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Jan 29 20:43:44 2014
New Revision: 207280
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207280&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/21609
* include/ext/array_allocator.h: Add deprecated
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59956
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 29 20:44:50 2014
New Revision: 207281
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207281&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/59956
* friend.c (do_friend): Pass the TEMPLATE_DECL to add_f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21609
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58651
--- Comment #4 from Volker Reichelt ---
Just for the records:
The bug was fixed by Jason's patch for PR58812 which also contains the above
testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58466
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 29 20:54:21 2014
New Revision: 207283
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207283&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/58466
* pt.c (unify_pack_expansion): Call expand_template_ar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58561
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Jan 29 20:54:09 2014
New Revision: 207282
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207282&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-29 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58561
* dwarf2out.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58561
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59990
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Seems rather like bug 58416 to me, if I understand it correctly (SFmode
and DFmode x87 floating-point loads wrongly used when the result is used
other than for arithmetic). Should only affe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49346
Tero Koskinen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59990
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |target
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59991
Bug ID: 59991
Summary: Recursive lambda capture in C++1y constexpr function
template causes internal compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59991
--- Comment #1 from Paul Keir ---
Created attachment 31988
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31988&action=edit
The output following: g++ -std=c++1y bug.cpp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49425
Tero Koskinen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58466
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58466
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 29 21:28:20 2014
New Revision: 207284
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207284&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/58466
* pt.c (unify_pack_expansion): Call expand_template_ar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59956
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
Summary|[4.8/4.9 regress
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59989
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59707
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59989
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 29 22:12:09 2014
New Revision: 207285
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207285&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/59989
* pt.c (expand_template_argument_pack): Correct
non
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59990
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57226
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59932
Zhendong Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59932
Zhendong Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |WONTFIX
--- Comment #9 from Zhendong Su --
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59989
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jan 30 01:54:33 2014
New Revision: 207293
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207293&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/59989
* pt.c (expand_template_argument_pack): Correct
non
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59989
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59645
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59990
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59707
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jan 30 05:28:52 2014
New Revision: 207295
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207295&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/59707
* call.c (add_builtin_candidate): Catch dependent types
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48272
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59784
--- Comment #1 from Chung-Lin Tang ---
Author: cltang
Date: Thu Jan 30 05:51:30 2014
New Revision: 207297
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207297&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-30 Savin Zlobec
PR target/59784
* config/nios2/nios2.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56422
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> > Note: The IR has not yet passed the J3/WG5 vote and has thus to be taken
> > with a pinch of salt.
See F08/0086 in http://www.j3-fortran.org/doc/year/14
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59807
--- Comment #7 from Andrey H. ---
Kai, so what would be the fix?
IMHO, this bug is quite a show stopper for C++11 threading in Mingw-w64, so
maybe it worth to create a temporary patch for Mingw-w64 compilation with
pthreads support just to have a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59985
--- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> does it work if you configure with --without-build-config? (thus, disable
> bootstrap-debug)
Ok with this option, stage 2 is not compiled with -gtoggle, and th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59985
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
101 - 165 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
