ha20140128' --enable-libstdcxx-time
--enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit
--enable-clocale=gnu --enable-multilib --disable-altivec --disable-fixed-point
--enable-targets=all --enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-libgomp --enable-lto
--without-cloog
Thread model: posix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59977
--- Comment #1 from David Kredba ---
Gcc-4.8.2 compiles Calligra 2.7.91 with the same CFLAGS.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55650
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59594
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 29 09:27:43 2014
New Revision: 207225
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207225&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/59594
* tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_analyze_dat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59978
Bug ID: 59978
Summary: C++11 Non-Type-Template-Parameter Pack Expansion not
working according to standard
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59979
Bug ID: 59979
Summary: mpc configure does not check for non-gnu compiler
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59893
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59903
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59905
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58712
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 29 10:35:15 2014
New Revision: 207230
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207230&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR other/58712
* read-rtl.c (read_rtx_code): Clear all of RTX_CODE_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58702
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59920
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 29 11:02:46 2014
New Revision: 207231
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207231&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/59917
PR tree-optimization/59920
* tree.c (build_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59917
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 29 11:02:46 2014
New Revision: 207231
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207231&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/59917
PR tree-optimization/59920
* tree.c (build_c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59594
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59920
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59917
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46333
Sergey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fukanchik at gmail dot com
--- Comment #23 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58742
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 29 11:08:59 2014
New Revision: 207232
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207232&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-29 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/58742
* tree-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46333
--- Comment #24 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Sergey from comment #23)
> I'm still getting the same with sunpro building gcc 4.8.2
What do you mean "the same"? Are you using --enable-build-with-cxx for GCC
4.8.2? Are you using --disable-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59905
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 31977
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31977&action=edit
patch
I am testing the following. The middle-end now properly calls a function via
the ABI as specified by the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58028
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58028
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
The testsuite failures are. We have to do sth about them.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59980
Bug ID: 59980
Summary: Diagnostics relating to template-specialisations using
enums.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59981
Bug ID: 59981
Summary: [4.9 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/opt/pr52727.C: ICE: in
connect_traces, at dwarf2cfi.c:2706 with -g -m32 -Os
on x86_64-apple-darwin13
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58028
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> The testsuite failures are. We have to do sth about them.
Revert r200946?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46333
--- Comment #25 from Sergey ---
Sorry. I mean i am getting the following error:
> "../../gcc-4.5/libcpp/files.c", line 1193: Error: Cannot assign char* to int.
this is obstack related stuff.
The following does not compile:
obstack_free (&pfile-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56422
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59982
Bug ID: 59982
Summary: Loop optimizer generates an infinite loop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58742
--- Comment #21 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, I have a patch that does the remaining (including the duplicate bug). But
for the (p + sz) - p case it can only optimize the sizeof (*p) == 1 without
range information - for example for
__SIZE_TYPE__
f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59933
Ian Hamilton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at g0tcd dot com
--- Comment #2 from I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59982
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58028
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58028
>
> --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > The testsuite failures are. We have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58028
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Grosser ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #8)
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
>
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58028
> >
> > --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humier
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59923
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59933
--- Comment #3 from Ian Hamilton ---
Just a thought.
Does ((int)(sizeof(NSQ_del_dec_struct) / sizeof(opus_int32)) correctly give you
the size of the sLPC_Q14 array?
>From playing with my test case, it seems that if the optimiser spots that k
wil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59575
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, I've even tried:
for k in arm thumb; do for j in soft softfp hard; do for i in armv2 armv2a
armv3 armv3m armv4 armv4t armv5 armv5e armv5t armv5te armv6 armv6-m armv6j
armv6k armv6s-m armv6t2 armv6z armv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59948
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59947
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Version|unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59916
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58702
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Jan 29 13:36:22 2014
New Revision: 207235
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207235&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-01-29 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58702
* semantics
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59908
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
There is a very old duplicate somewhere. Happens with store-motion for a
simple
void foo (int n)
{
int x, i;
for (i = 0; i < n; ++i)
x = i;
bar (&x);
}
IIRC. Of course requires us to re-write x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58702
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59959
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Component|fortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59981
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59315
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 29 13:40:49 2014
New Revision: 207236
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207236&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/59315
* decl.c (cxx_maybe_build_cleanup): Call mark_used.
Mo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59315
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59983
Bug ID: 59983
Summary: By using -fopenmp local-variable contains wrong value
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59977
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58674
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59967
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |tree-optimization
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59958
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59983
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59955
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59977
--- Comment #3 from David Kredba ---
Thank you.
sci-libs/vc was build with gcc 4.9 lto a few svn revisions before, other
libraries are not built with LTO at all.
I will try vc first and then this again.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59977
--- Comment #4 from David Kredba ---
No, it was not gcc 4.9 lto on vc, it was gcc 4.8.2 lto, so no slim.
I can't build vc with gcc 4.9 lto:
Linking CXX executable c++11_arithmetics_sse
cd /var/tmp/portage/dev-libs/vc-0.7.3/work/vc-0.7.3_build/te
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58028
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, grosser at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58028
>
> --- Comment #9 from Tobias Grosser ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59575
--- Comment #23 from Ryan Mansfield ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #21)
> Can you
> break gen_rtx_fmt_E_stat if code == SEQUENCE
> and see where this SEQUENCE has been allocated and why the count is so
> bogusly high?
#1 0x0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59916
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59977
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to David Kredba from comment #3)
> Thank you.
>
> sci-libs/vc was build with gcc 4.9 lto a few svn revisions before, other
> libraries are not built with LTO at all.
>
> I will try vc first and th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59980
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jason from comment #0)
> And I'd like a way to make the 's1<(e1)1u>' or 's2<(e2)1>' portion in the
> message look like 's1' or 's2', which is clearer (to me).
I agree it would be nice. The diff
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59575
--- Comment #24 from Ryan Mansfield ---
$ valgrind ./cc1 -fexceptions ~/conftest.c
==5295== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==5295== Copyright (C) 2002-2012, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==5295== Using Valgrind-3.8.1 and LibVEX; rerun
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59575
--- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 31980
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31980&action=edit
gcc49-pr59575.patch
Ah, of course, you're right, num_dwarf_regs is uninitialized. Fixed thusly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59575
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31943|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57907
Alexander Stohr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexander.stohr at gmx dot de
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57907
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
--- Comment #3 from Ramana R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
Bug ID: 59984
Summary: OpenMP and Cilk Plus SIMD pragma makes loop incorrect
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
--- Comment #1 from Stupachenko Evgeny ---
Created attachment 31981
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31981&action=edit
test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59575
--- Comment #27 from Ryan Mansfield ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #25)
> Created attachment 31980 [details]
> gcc49-pr59575.patch
>
> Ah, of course, you're right, num_dwarf_regs is uninitialized. Fixed thusly.
Yep, that fixes the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58742
--- Comment #22 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 29 14:45:44 2014
New Revision: 207239
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207239&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-29 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/58742
* tree-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59977
David Kredba changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59985
Bug ID: 59985
Summary: stage2/3 compare error on lto-streamer-in.o
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootst
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59829
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Jan 29 14:57:42 2014
New Revision: 207241
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207241&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/59829
* include/bits/stl_vector.h (vector::data()): Ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59565
Ulrich Drepper changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59575
--- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Ryan Mansfield from comment #27)
> Yep, that fixes the ICE. Thanks
Could you please bootstrap/regtest it if you have hw for that?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59980
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58742
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58846
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59565
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53756
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||drepper.fsp+rhbz at gmail dot
com
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59951
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59829
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59985
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
does it work if you configure with --without-build-config? (thus, disable
bootstrap-debug)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59951
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, just compiling bitmap.c at -O3 I see a compare-debug failure and
> ./cc1plus -quiet -O3 bitmap.ii -fopt-info-vec -g
> ./cc1plus -quiet -O3 bitmap.ii -fopt-info-vec
/space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/bit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53221
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tmmikolajczyk at gmail dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53221
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.9.0 |---
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59283
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56922
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59951
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
I have a patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59575
--- Comment #29 from Ryan Mansfield ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #28)
> (In reply to Ryan Mansfield from comment #27)
> > Yep, that fixes the ICE. Thanks
>
> Could you please bootstrap/regtest it if you have hw for that?
Yep, I ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38341
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-elf-gcc |arm-elf-gcc,x86
Status|UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21609
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59679
--- Comment #17 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Some more analysis:
The target code expands non-bwx QImode store
;; MEM[(I8 *)_67] = _69;
via alpha_expand_mov_nobwx, where around line 2229 (config/alpha.c) target
address gets checked with "aligned_memory_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59679
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #18 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59986
Bug ID: 59986
Summary: Unnecessary edges in the CFG due to setjmp
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59956
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21609
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini ---
I agree, let's deprecate it for 4.9.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21609
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59986
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59986
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
No disagreement this won't address 59920, where we clearly need to avoid
creating the unnecessary edges in the first place to do something sensible for
that BZ.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59923
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
