http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52539
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58712
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59836
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59801
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Those two cases are different, the other PR was about automatic volatile
variables, where if they are unused it is really hard to come up with a way how
they could be modified behind compiler's back. While fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59830
--- Comment #2 from b17c0de at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> relies on mutexes and condition variables so you need to compile
> and link with -pthread
Thanks! That was indeed the problem. Whats with the strange
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59775
--- Comment #13 from David Kredba ---
I have to keep LTO still off for Libreoffice. (And for many of simple programs
that do the test for endian type the way not counting with LTO and for some
that linker is not happy with relocation(s) and a few
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46507
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46507
>
> --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
void arg_tuple_test(const std::pair&) (const st
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59774
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58992
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59839
Bug ID: 59839
Summary: i686 AVX2 gather intrinsic not compiling with -O0
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59838
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58602
--- Comment #5 from Laurent Aflonsi ---
Ping ?
Is this ok for trunk ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58602
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58733
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59827
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Jan 16 11:42:56 2014
New Revision: 206660
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206660&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/59827
* cgraph.c (gimple_check_call_args): Don't us
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59543
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31527|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59830
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59712
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.9.0
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57763
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 31852
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31852&action=edit
gcc49-pr57763.patch
Untested fix.
So, from what I can understand, the really computed jumps are just fine, the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28865
--- Comment #26 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Thu Jan 16 12:17:48 2014
New Revision: 206661
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206661&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/28865
* varasm.c (output_constant): Return the number of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57180
Bug 57180 depends on bug 28865, which changed state.
Bug 28865 Summary: Structures with a flexible arrray member have wrong .size
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28865
What|Removed |Added
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28865
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57763
--- Comment #19 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #18)
> Attached is an attempt to fix this just by setting JUMP_LABEL on the
> indirect jump, then computed_jump_p predicate will be false and the various
> places in RTL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59840
Bug ID: 59840
Summary: -Wconversion produces incorrect warning when value is
shifted by 0
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59841
Bug ID: 59841
Summary: [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_ssa
failed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59827
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Jan 16 12:59:36 2014
New Revision: 206662
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206662&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/59827
* gimple-low.c (gimple_check_call_args): Don'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59839
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59839
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590
--- Comment #39 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 16 13:48:51 2014
New Revision: 206663
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206663&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-16 Richard Biener
PR rtl-optimization/46590
* lcm.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996
--- Comment #14 from Barry Tannenbaum ---
The original author of the code is no longer working on the Cilk project, so I
can't say why it's using sched_getaffinity + gettid instead the pthread
routine. But I'll modify it to use the pthread routin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The reporter of PR57298 supposedly has or had, I don't.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59841
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58344
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59841
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59831
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59834
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59828
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59842
Bug ID: 59842
Summary: `__x86.get_pc_thunk.bx' referenced in section `.text':
defined in discarded section…
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59842
--- Comment #2 from Thorsten Glaser ---
Created attachment 31857
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31857&action=edit
symbols file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59843
Bug ID: 59843
Summary: ICE with return of generic vector on aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59842
--- Comment #1 from Thorsten Glaser ---
Created attachment 31856
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31856&action=edit
preprocessed source code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59842
Thorsten Glaser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i486-linux-gnu
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59827
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59827
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Jan 16 14:59:46 2014
New Revision: 206665
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206665&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/59827
* gimple-low.c (gimple_check_call_args): Don'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58139
--- Comment #12 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Thu Jan 16 14:57:00 2014
New Revision: 206664
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206664&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2014-01-15 Uros Bizjak
* config/i3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996
--- Comment #16 from Balaji V. Iyer ---
Hi Jakub,
Honestly, I don't know why the changes were done in aclocal.m4. I added the
change to configure.ac and then did the following commands:
autoreconf --force --verbose
automake --add-missing --ve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59844
Bug ID: 59844
Summary: Powerpc64le cannot bootstrap with -O3/-mcpu=power8
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59835
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59835
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ah, with -O2 -mavx512f -march=k8 it actually hangs. So the short testcase is
enough to reproduce it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59844
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 31858
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31858&action=edit
Proposed patch to fix the problem
Patch tested by Bill Schmitd, and passes the regression testing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59844
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le-linux
Status|U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54694
--- Comment #19 from Richard Henderson ---
Author: rth
Date: Thu Jan 16 16:23:54 2014
New Revision: 20
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=20&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/54694
Diagnose frame_pointer_required vs fixed hfp
Added:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996
--- Comment #17 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
If there's an interest, I could probably create a kickstart for a RHL8 VM
suitable for building GCC 4.9. But it's a 10+ year old platform of marginal
value at best.
I'd be much more concerned about using
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59843
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54694
--- Comment #20 from Richard Henderson ---
Author: rth
Date: Thu Jan 16 16:33:30 2014
New Revision: 206667
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206667&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/54694
Diagnose frame_pointer_required vs fixed hfp
Added:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59820
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson ---
I think you're right. I'm preparing a patch for glibc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59842
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- |
|bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59835
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54694
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590
--- Comment #40 from Richard Biener ---
On the full testcase tree LIM uses too much memory (I didn't merge some of
the patches that only benefit this kind of testcase ... bah). Without LIM
we use around 1GB of memory at -O2 and
df reaching defs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59821
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59844
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Jan 16 17:08:52 2014
New Revision: 206668
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206668&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-16 Michael Meissner
PR target/59844
* config/rs600
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59821
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
While I agree with that, for _builtin_{LINE,FILE,FUNCTION} (), those were added
specifically for the use in default arguments and were I think from the start
meant to give you the location of the call, not of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59835
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Untested patch for kunpckhi:
2014-01-16 Jakub Jelinek
* config/i386/i386.md (kunpckhi): Add GPR alternative.
--- gcc/config/i386/i386.md.jj2014-01-09 21:07:23.0 +0100
+++ gcc/config/i386/i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58602
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #7 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59843
Yufeng Zhang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64-linux |aarch64-linux aarch64-elf
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59844
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59844
--- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Jan 16 17:35:41 2014
New Revision: 206670
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206670&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-16 Michael Meissner
Back port from mainline
2014-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59780
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Thu Jan 16 17:35:50 2014
New Revision: 206671
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206671&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/59780
* aarch64.c (aarch64_split_128bit_move): Don't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59780
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59842
--- Comment #5 from Thorsten Glaser ---
Hm, unsure. These versioning scripts are pretty much recent GNU stuff. But if
you have input…
cvs -d _anon...@anoncvs.mirbsd.org:/cvs co -PA -d xchat-randex
contrib/hosted/tg/code/xchat-randex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59821
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #3)
> I think gimplify_arg clobbering a valid EXPR_LOCATION is wrong; both cases
> should give the location of the default argument definition.
>
> Aldy, what was the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46507
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka ---
I agree we want to do as much as possible in FE.
ODR decisions are basically done in frontend now - we basically use mangling of
virtual tables given to us by C++ FE. Eventually we will want to get ODR
inform
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59842
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Thorsten Glaser from comment #5)
> Hm, unsure. These versioning scripts are pretty much recent GNU stuff.
Recent as in the last 10 years maybe. But not in the last 5 years. Also they
are suppo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59845
Bug ID: 59845
Summary: loop optimization problem when profiling
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59846
Bug ID: 59846
Summary: Imprecise column number for -Wtype-limits
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59821
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> While I agree with that, for _builtin_{LINE,FILE,FUNCTION} (), those were
> added specifically for the use in default arguments and were I think from
> the start m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59831
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59821
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59847
Bug ID: 59847
Summary: cast to long makes compiler crash if using option
pdp-11/10
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59835
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Jan 16 19:04:08 2014
New Revision: 206676
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206676&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-16 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/59835
* ir
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59845
--- Comment #1 from ArshaGCC ---
I found that only when I use very high vales for input the problem persists.
for example when using 123456 as input for profiling it generates incorrect
code but when using 12345 as input the correct code will be g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59387
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 16 19:14:49 2014
New Revision: 206678
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206678&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/59387
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr59387.c: New t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54694
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 16 19:15:46 2014
New Revision: 206679
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206679&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/54694
* gcc.target/i386/pr9771-1.c (main): Rename to...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59845
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
>(constant folding problem within loop?)
No it is doing the following:
if (n>=1)
{
i = 1;
while (true)
{
if (n%i == 0)
{
printf("\n%d", i);
i++;
if (n/2 <
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54694
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 16 19:20:50 2014
New Revision: 206680
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206680&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/54694
* gcc.target/i386/pr9771-1.c (main): Rename to...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59609
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Jan 16 19:13:54 2014
New Revision: 206677
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206677&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-16 Vladimir Makarov
PR middle-end/59609
* lra-cons
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54694
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 16 19:22:08 2014
New Revision: 206681
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206681&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/54694
* gcc.target/i386/pr9771-1.c (main): Rename to...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59839
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 16 19:24:07 2014
New Revision: 206682
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206682&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/59839
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_builtin): If targe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59839
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 16 19:26:08 2014
New Revision: 206683
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206683&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/59839
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_builtin): If targe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59839
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 16 19:27:28 2014
New Revision: 206684
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206684&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/59839
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_builtin): If targe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59839
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59835
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Of course, no real performance testing has been performed, perhaps there
> should be one ? or more for the =Q, Q, 0 alternative. Without any ?, we
> don't ICE or e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59835
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59609
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59825
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Assignee
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59490
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Assignee
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58344
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 16 19:54:23 2014
New Revision: 206685
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206685&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/58344
* expr.c (expand_expr_real_1): Handle init == NU
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59821
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jan 16 19:55:12 2014
New Revision: 206686
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206686&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/59821
* tree.c (bot_manip): Update the location of builtin_LI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59821
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
