http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59538
--- Comment #4 from Arsham Skrenes ---
Can I suggest then that GCC outputs a compiler warning when it removes a loop?
It outputs warnings for unused variables as well as implicit casting, so why
not have a warning for removing loops?
Also, is the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59527
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59538
Arsham Skrenes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59527
--- Comment #5 from Teresa Johnson ---
This seems like a separate issue - can you give me a reproducer? The
attached minimized test case does not hit this.
Thanks,
Teresa
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:45 AM, trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
> ht
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59523
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 17 21:36:21 2013
New Revision: 206069
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206069&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/59523
* tree-vectorizer.c (fold_loop_vectorized
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50895
--- Comment #7 from Kai Tietz ---
*** Bug 52468 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59523
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59527
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
The testcase is too big to attach.
% wget trippelsdorf.de/testcase.tar.bz2
% tar xvjf testcase.tar.bz2
% g++ -w -nostdlib -r -flto=4 -fprofile-use -fprofile-correction
-march=amdfam10 -fno-rtti -fno-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59513
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I installed foil today through fink and noticed that the fortran files are
compiled (gfortran 4.8.2) with '-O0 -fdefault-real-8 -fdefault-integer-8'. Are
you using these options?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52468
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
#1 from Marek Polacek ---
I can't reproduce this one with gcc version 4.9.0 20131217.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59350
--- Comment #34 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #33)
> OK, thanks for the testcase, which boils down to:
FAIL for me too
r205459 PASS
r205461, r206013 FAIL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34723
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|19794 |
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59538
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59538
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Also, is there a directive that I can use to explicitly tell GCC
> to not remove a loop (without having to resort to a compiler flag
> which is global, printing a variable, or using the 'volatile' k
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59527
--- Comment #7 from tejohnson at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: tejohnson
Date: Tue Dec 17 22:35:38 2013
New Revision: 206072
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206072&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-12-17 Teresa Johnson
PR gcov-profile/59527
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57709
--- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Sat, 14 Dec 2013, jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com wrote:
> Similar inappropriate warning is generated for typedef-vs-variable as reported
> now by Adam Jackson. Again a mistaken use can
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59535
--- Comment #7 from Yvan Roux ---
I'm not able to reproduce with today's trunk or rev #205887 built for
arm-none-linux-gnueabi, as the compiler ICEs in assign_by_spills
(lra-assign.c). What is your configuration ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57702
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59520
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
The main concerns for diagnostics in such cases are (a) that they are
meaningful and (b) that invalid code gets at least one error with
-pedantic-errors, and at least one warning or error wi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20262
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Indeed, I think the current token could reasonably be anything from
"assert" to the ")" ending the call to "assert", inclusive.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18469
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> The macros required in crtstuff.c are:
> - HAVE_GAS_HIDDEN
> - HAVE_LD_EH_FRAME_HDR
Various target macros used in target code as well
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35535
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Tue Dec 17 23:41:41 2013
New Revision: 206073
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206073&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/35535
* tree-vrp.c (extract_range_from_unary_expr_1):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35535
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Tue Dec 17 23:43:22 2013
New Revision: 206074
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206074&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/35535
* gimple-fold.c (fold_gimple_assign): Attempt to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39578
--- Comment #4 from John E. / TDM ---
I can confirm this has been fixed. Sorry for not doing so sooner.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59539
Bug ID: 59539
Summary: Missed optimisation: VEX-prefixed operations don't
need aligned data
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59538
--- Comment #6 from Arsham Skrenes ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #5)
> > Also, is there a directive that I can use to explicitly tell GCC
> > to not remove a loop (without having to resort to a compiler flag
> > which is glo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59538
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Try:
// GCC Bug - bug.c
// Created by Arsham Skrenes on 2013-12-17
#include
#include
// Find the NTH prime number SAMPLES times
#define NTH 1
#define SAMPLES 5
int main(void)
{
struct timeva
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59540
Bug ID: 59540
Summary: ICE while building libcilkrt library with
--disable-bootstrap and --disable-checking
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52897
--- Comment #3 from fdarkangel at gmail dot com ---
Persists in gcc 4.8.2.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52773
--- Comment #8 from fdarkangel at gmail dot com ---
Persists in gcc 4.8.2.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59226
--- Comment #13 from David Kredba ---
Qtwebkit-4.8.5 still ICEs after that patch applied:
lto1: internal compiler error: in record_target_from_binfo, at ipa-devirt.c:673
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59527
--- Comment #8 from Teresa Johnson ---
I can't reproduce this one using your source/profles and command line
(using a trunk updated to head last night plus my fix for the assert).
I verified that splitting is kicking in, but no error occurs. Do yo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59534
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59541
Bug ID: 59541
Summary: [4.9 Regression] Revision 206070 breaks bootstrap on
darwin
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
101 - 135 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
