http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59505
--- Comment #6 from David Kredba ---
Hello,
Before reporting this to you I opened a Mesa bug where they suggested me to try
released version of GCC. Gcc-4.8.2 works for them with -flto=4. This report is
result of that suggestion. It works for me t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59505
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||octoploid at yandex dot com
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59502
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35040
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58372
--- Comment #11 from sonoro at telefonica dot net ---
So it seems you solved the problem in sjlj
Are you going to push it?
Thanks
victor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59450
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Sat Dec 14 10:31:56 2013
New Revision: 205983
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205983&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-12-14 Janus Weil
PR fortran/59450
* module.c (mio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59450
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to bugs from comment #5)
> just wanted to say thanks. Your speed is terrific :)
you're welcome :)
The fix has landed on trunk by now. If the example you posted is part of a
larger code ba
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59505
--- Comment #8 from David Kredba ---
Thank you Markus.
Could you please tell me if binutils 2.24.51.0.2 are OK for this?
I will try AR=gcc-ar etc in the meantime.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59493
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Here is a simpler patch (which could even be considered for backporting to
4.8):
Index: gcc/fortran/class.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/class
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59505
--- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to David Kredba from comment #8)
> Thank you Markus.
> Could you please tell me if binutils 2.24.51.0.2 are OK for this?
Unfortunately not out of the box. I use the attached simple patch for b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
tysonroy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tysonroy at yopmail dot fr
--- Comment #38 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59505
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Created attachment 31437
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31437&action=edit
binutils patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59506
Bug ID: 59506
Summary: net FAILs (timeout) on alpha
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
Assignee
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59505
--- Comment #11 from David Kredba ---
Hello Markus,
Thank you for your great support.
AS=gcc-as AR=gcc-ar NM=gcc-nm RANLIB=gcc-ranlib did it for me for mesa and I
will use it in problematic future cases.
And I will try your binutils patch.
Do y
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59350
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #14 from Eri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59506
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 31438
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31438&action=edit
strace -f output
Some ~30 seconds of strace dump.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59505
--- Comment #12 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to David Kredba from comment #11)
> And I will try your binutils patch.
>
> Do you think that for 4.9.0 GCC release binutils will support
> slim-LTO-objects?
> LTO support for general use in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59503
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Sat Dec 14 12:19:56 2013
New Revision: 205984
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205984&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/59503
* internal-fn.c (ubsan_expand_si_overflow_adds
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59503
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59507
Bug ID: 59507
Summary: ICE: in mark_reachable_handlers, at tree-eh.c:3833
with -O -fnon-call-exceptions -fvtable-verify=preinit
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59507
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59508
Bug ID: 59508
Summary: std::find could use specialized container's find
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59473
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59265
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||octoploid at yandex dot com
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59502
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #1)
> Patch:
Regtests cleanly. Will commit as obvious.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59350
--- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sat Dec 14 15:24:58 2013
New Revision: 205986
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205986&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
* var-tracking.c (add_stores): Fix oversight in latest commit.
Add
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59350
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-*-* |
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59493
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #5)
> Here is a simpler patch (which could even be considered for backporting to
> 4.8):
Just verified that it is free of testsuite regressions.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59490
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The following patch silences the failures:
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cilk-plus/CK/catch_exc.cc2013-12-11
19:35:38.0 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cilk-plus/CK/catch_exc.cc2013
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59445
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59492
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Dec 14 17:01:49 2013
New Revision: 205989
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205989&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Restore flag_pic in ix86_function_specific_restore
gcc/
PR targ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58857
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59492
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59502
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Sat Dec 14 17:47:22 2013
New Revision: 205990
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205990&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-12-14 Janus Weil
PR fortran/59502
* primary.c (gf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59502
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59509
Bug ID: 59509
Summary: template function definition. redefinition error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59450
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59509
--- Comment #1 from Albert Zeyer ---
Sorry, that was the error from my real app. From the test case, the error is:
test_prodtempl.cpp:24:6: error: redefinition of 'template
decltype (prod(a, b)) operator*(const T1&, const T2&)'
auto operator*(co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52370
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58477
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sat Dec 14 18:28:22 2013
New Revision: 205991
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205991&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/58477
* cgraphclones.c (cgraph_clone_edge): Do not res
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59418
Ryan Mansfield changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46641
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51605
Bug 51605 depends on bug 51610, which changed state.
Bug 51610 Summary: [OOP] Class container does not properly handle POINTER and
TARGET
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51610
What|Removed |Added
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51610
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47399
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45824
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46641
Bug 46641 depends on bug 45824, which changed state.
Bug 45824 Summary: Update expr.c's check_inquiry for C_SIZEOF,
compiler_version/_options, etc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45824
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59265
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Here's a reduced testcase that works without any gcda file:
markus@x4 testcase % < test.ii
class A {
int m_fn1() const;
unsigned m_fn2() const;
};
class B {
public:
virtual void m_fn1();
};
class
nfigured with: /mnt/svn/gcc-trunk//configure --enable-checking=yes,rtl,df
--enable-languages=c,c++,lto,fortran
--prefix=/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/binary-205985-lto-fortran-checking-yes-rtl-df/
--without-cloog --without-ppl
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20131214 (experimental) (GCC)
Tested revisio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58477
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sat Dec 14 22:08:48 2013
New Revision: 205993
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205993&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/58477
* ipa-prop.c (stmt_may_be_vtbl_ptr_store): Skip
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51610
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51605
Bug 51605 depends on bug 51610, which changed state.
Bug 51610 Summary: [OOP] Class container does not properly handle POINTER and
TARGET
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51610
What|Removed |Added
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55217
Michael Veksler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mickey.veksler at gmail dot com
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55217
--- Comment #2 from Michael Veksler ---
A much more clear-cut, weird, and severe case:
$ cat delta.c
int bar();
void foo()
{
int stop= 0;
for (int i=10 ; i>=0 && !stop; --i) {
stop= bar();
}
}
$ gcc -c -O3 -Wstrict-overflow=3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59419
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
55 matches
Mail list logo
