[Bug middle-end/58941] [4.7 Regression] value modification on zero-length array optimized away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58941 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Moschcau --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > And 4.8.3. Hello Richard, will there also be a fix for gcc 4.6.x? Kind Regards Thomas

[Bug testsuite/59308] New: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-ifcombine-ccmp-[1456] tests fail on arm cortex-a5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59308 Bug ID: 59308 Summary: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-ifcombine-ccmp-[1456] tests fail on arm cortex-a5 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/59303] uninit-pred-8_b.c and uninit-pred-9_b.c fail after better optimizations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59303 --- Comment #3 from christophe.lyon at st dot com --- I have filed PR 59308 about the ssa-ifcombine-ccmp* tests failing on cortex-a5. Should I mark this bug report (59303) as a duplicate of 49498?

[Bug lto/56706] [4.8/4.9 Regression] failure building CP2K at -flto -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56706 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.0 Known to fail|4.9.0

[Bug target/59187] internal error with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59187 --- Comment #5 from Alessio --- Hello, when you fix a mingw bug where can I download the new version of compiler? I should wait a new release or I can get from trunk?!?! I get another internal error. Il Lunedì 25 Novembre 2013 22:16, ktietz at

[Bug middle-end/58941] [4.7 Regression] value modification on zero-length array optimized away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58941 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, thomas.moschcau at web dot de wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58941 > > --- Comment #6 from Thomas Moschcau --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from commen

[Bug tree-optimization/59288] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in get_initial_def_for_induction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59288 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 27 08:50:15 2013 New Revision: 205434 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205434&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-11-27 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/59288 * tree-v

[Bug tree-optimization/59288] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in get_initial_def_for_induction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59288 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.0 Summary|[4.7/4.8/4.9 Re

[Bug testsuite/59308] [4.9 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-ifcombine-ccmp-[1456] tests fail on arm cortex-a5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59308 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/58746] [4.9 Regression] Incorrect warning with -Waggressive-loop-optimizations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58746 --- Comment #1 from Joost VandeVondele --- Reduced : MODULE mathlib INTEGER, PARAMETER :: dp = 8 CONTAINS FUNCTION expint(n,x) REAL(dp) :: x, expint nm1=n-1 DO i=1,MAXIT IF(i.NE.nm1) THEN DO ii=1,nm1 psi=p

[Bug target/59305] [4.9 Regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c fails with WARNING: program timed out on x86_64-apple-darwin13

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59305 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 Summary|gcc.dg/atomic/c

[Bug tree-optimization/59303] [4.9 Regression] uninit-pred-8_b.c and uninit-pred-9_b.c fail after better optimizations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59303 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm, x86_64 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug c++/57645] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Explicitly-declared destructor with no exception specification is always noexcept(true)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57645 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|paolo.carlini at oracle dot com|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/58746] [4.9 Regression] Incorrect warning with -Waggressive-loop-optimizations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58746 --- Comment #2 from Joost VandeVondele --- this testcase gives the same error without LTO. Just -O2 is sufficient: INTEGER, PARAMETER :: dp = 8 REAL(KIND=dp), VOLATILE :: r=0.1_dp r = expint(1,r) CONTAINS FUNCTION expint(n,x) REAL(dp

[Bug middle-end/59138] [4.8/4.9 Regression] possible packed struct miscompile

't write past the end of the structure. (store_bit_field): Fix formatting. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20131127-1.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/expr.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

[Bug middle-end/59138] [4.8/4.9 Regression] possible packed struct miscompile

't write past the end of the structure. (store_bit_field): Fix formatting. Added: branches/gcc-4_8-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20131127-1.c - copied unchanged from r205436, trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20131127-1.c Modified: branches/gcc-4_8-branch/

[Bug middle-end/59138] [4.8/4.9 Regression] possible packed struct miscompile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59138 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/59289] [ARM] regression on unsigned-extend-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59289 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|arm |arm-*-* Status|U

[Bug middle-end/59037] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE when accessing invalid element (nelts + 1) of vector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59037 --- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Wed Nov 27 10:00:30 2013 New Revision: 205438 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205438&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Don't create out-of-bounds BIT_FIELD_REF. 2013-11-27 Tom de Vrie

[Bug c++/59032] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE incrementing vector type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59032 --- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Wed Nov 27 10:00:48 2013 New Revision: 205439 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205439&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Handle vector increment/decrement in build_unary_op 2013-11-27 T

[Bug middle-end/58723] [4.9 Regression] ICE in lto_output_edge, at lto-cgraph.c:300 for OpenMP's simd reduction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- We fail to stream cfun->has_force_vect_loops.

[Bug middle-end/58723] [4.9 Regression] ICE in lto_output_edge, at lto-cgraph.c:300 for OpenMP's simd reduction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #31299|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/58723] [4.9 Regression] ICE in lto_output_edge, at lto-cgraph.c:300 for OpenMP's simd reduction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #31305|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/58723] [4.9 Regression] ICE in lto_output_edge, at lto-cgraph.c:300 for OpenMP's simd reduction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #31306|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/58723] [4.9 Regression] ICE in lto_output_edge, at lto-cgraph.c:300 for OpenMP's simd reduction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- Eh. make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/-flto/-ffat-lto-objects gomp.exp" FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/declare-simd-1.c (internal compiler error) FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/declare-simd-1.c (test for excess error

[Bug middle-end/58723] [4.9 Regression] ICE in lto_output_edge, at lto-cgraph.c:300 for OpenMP's simd reduction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9) > We fail to stream cfun->has_force_vect_loops. Note we don't necessarily have to stream that (and has_simduid_loops), the alternative is to compute it during str

[Bug middle-end/58723] [4.9 Regression] ICE in lto_output_edge, at lto-cgraph.c:300 for OpenMP's simd reduction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13) > Eh. > > make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/-flto/-ffat-lto-objects > gomp.exp" > > FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/declare-simd-1.c (internal compiler error)

[Bug sanitizer/59306] ICE with -fsanitize=null: gimple check: expected gimple_call(error_mark), have gimple_assign(addr_expr) in gimple_call_arg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59306 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Nov 27 11:40:22 2013 New Revision: 205443 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205443&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR sanitizer/59306 * ubsan.c (instrument_null): Use gimple_store_

[Bug sanitizer/59306] ICE with -fsanitize=null: gimple check: expected gimple_call(error_mark), have gimple_assign(addr_expr) in gimple_call_arg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59306 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/59259] [x32] Incorrect packing and/or alignment when using a 64 bit type as array of zero length in a structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59259 cjanderson at yandex dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |UNCONFIRMED Resolut

[Bug rtl-optimization/57189] [4.9 Regression] Vector register is spilled for vector extract pattern

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57189 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 f

[Bug rtl-optimization/57189] [4.9 Regression] Vector register is spilled for vector extract pattern

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57189 --- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > Likely caused by r198611. This is the patch that exposes the problem. I have filled this PR due to the difference with IRA vs. reload, it looks that spill size sho

[Bug sanitizer/59136] [4.9 Regression] llvm-symbolizer shouldn't be started always

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59136 --- Comment #10 from Alexey Samsonov --- Hi! Jakub suggested to use libbacktrace in libsanitizer. I've committed his patch to LLVM, and it will soon be merged into GCC, with many more changes. So, your change will not be needed. I've also ensured

[Bug c/59259] [x32] Incorrect packing and/or alignment when using a 64 bit type as array of zero length in a structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59259 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/35763] std::cout loses whole blocks of output if interrupted by signal without SA_RESTART

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35763 Johannes Schaub changed: What|Removed |Added CC||schaub.johannes@googlemail.

[Bug tree-optimization/54742] Switch elimination in FSM loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742 jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu

[Bug libstdc++/35763] std::cout loses whole blocks of output if interrupted by signal without SA_RESTART

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35763 --- Comment #5 from Johannes Schaub --- We also have this bug and it took us several days to find the cause. Testcase by my colleague attached. Perhaps this should fire an assertion if it is hard to fix efficiently, instead of simply letting thin

[Bug tree-optimization/54742] Switch elimination in FSM loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742 jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resoluti

[Bug tree-optimization/19794] [meta-bug] Jump threading related bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19794 Bug 19794 depends on bug 54742, which changed state. Bug 54742 Summary: Switch elimination in FSM loop http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c/59259] [x32] Incorrect packing and/or alignment when using a 64 bit type as array of zero length in a structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59259 cjanderson at yandex dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #6 from

[Bug middle-end/59309] New: FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/CK/spawnee_inline.c -g -fcilkplus (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59309 Bug ID: 59309 Summary: FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/CK/spawnee_inline.c -g -fcilkplus (test for excess errors) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/59310] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/openmp-simd-1.c (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59310 Bug ID: 59310 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/openmp-simd-1.c (test for excess errors) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug c++/59311] New: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1y/vla-initlist1.C (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311 Bug ID: 59311 Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1y/vla-initlist1.C (test for excess errors) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug c++/59311] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1y/vla-initlist1.C (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/59311] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1y/vla-initlist1.C (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- ==8030==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow on address 0x0297d2e4 at pc 0xe64e63 bp 0x7fffe2f360f0 sp 0x7fffe2f360e8 READ of size 4 at 0x0297d2e4 thread T0 #0 0xe64e62 (/export/build/gnu/gcc-

[Bug c++/59311] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1y/vla-initlist1.C (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (gdb) f 0 #0 dwarf2out_frame_debug (insn=0x75980ca8) at /export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/dwarf2cfi.c:2000 2000 fde->vdrap_reg = dwf_regno (n); (gdb) p n $2 = (rtx_def *) 0x7597cd40 (gdb) call deb

[Bug middle-end/59309] FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/CK/spawnee_inline.c -g -fcilkplus (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59309 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Breakpoint 4, 0x007fb146 in gimplify_cilk_spawn (spawn_p=, before=, after=) at /export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/c-family/cilk.c:774 774 if (*arg_array == NULL_TREE) (gdb) bt #0 0x007fb146 in

[Bug middle-end/59309] FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/CK/spawnee_inline.c -g -fcilkplus (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59309 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bviyer at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from H.J

[Bug lto/47334] g++.dg/torture/pr31863.C -O2 -flto FAILs without visibility

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47334 --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- This issue now causes new failures on Solaris 9 with Sun as: FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-1.c -O2 -flto (test for excess errors) Excess errors: /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/t

[Bug middle-end/59310] FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/openmp-simd-1.c (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59310 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Breakpoint 1, c_parser_omp_simd (loc=loc@entry=9494, parser=parser@entry=0x7590f540, p_name=0x7fffd6a0 "I teams distribute simd teams distribute parallel for", mask=mask@entry=20113958316, cclauses

[Bug middle-end/59310] FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/openmp-simd-1.c (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59310 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at redhat dot com --- Comment #2 from H.J

[Bug c++/59312] New: Incorrect warning "defaulted move assignment for ... calls a non-trivial move assignment operator for virtual base ..."

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59312 Bug ID: 59312 Summary: Incorrect warning "defaulted move assignment for ... calls a non-trivial move assignment operator for virtual base ..." Product: gcc Version

[Bug rtl-optimization/59311] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1y/vla-initlist1.C (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com Component|c

[Bug rtl-optimization/59311] [4.9 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1y/vla-initlist1.C (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|FAIL: |[4.9 Regression] FAIL: |g++.d

[Bug fortran/59313] New: gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90 FAILs on Solaris/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59313 Bug ID: 59313 Summary: gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90 FAILs on Solaris/SPARC Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortr

[Bug c++/59312] Incorrect warning "defaulted move assignment for ... calls a non-trivial move assignment operator for virtual base ..."

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59312 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Which document are you looking at? That's not what 12.8/23 in the standard says.

[Bug tree-optimization/59014] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59014 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED CC|jakub at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/59014] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59014 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 31310 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31310&action=edit gcc49-pr59014-test.patch Testcase that reproduces also on 4.8 and 4.7. I'll bootstrap/regtest both patches now

[Bug c++/59314] New: [DR 1054] [C++11] access to volatile through reference should cause load

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59314 Bug ID: 59314 Summary: [DR 1054] [C++11] access to volatile through reference should cause load Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/59310] FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/openmp-simd-1.c (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59310 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/58723] [4.9 Regression] ICE in lto_output_edge, at lto-cgraph.c:300 for OpenMP's simd reduction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723 --- Comment #16 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 27 15:18:23 2013 New Revision: 205447 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205447&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-11-27 Richard Biener PR middle-end/58723 * cgraphbuild.

[Bug c++/59315] New: [4.9 regression] g++.dg/warn/Wunused-3.C FAILs on Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59315 Bug ID: 59315 Summary: [4.9 regression] g++.dg/warn/Wunused-3.C FAILs on Solaris Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug rtl-optimization/57410] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in emit_spill_move, at lra-constraints.c:863 with -fpeel-loops and uninitialised variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57410 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug c/59316] New: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c FAILs on Solaris/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316 Bug ID: 59316 Summary: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c FAILs on Solaris/SPARC Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug c/59316] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c FAILs on Solaris/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug c/59316] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c FAILs on Solaris/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|sparc*-sun-solaris2.* |sparc*-sun-solaris2.*,

[Bug middle-end/58723] [4.9 Regression] ICE in lto_output_edge, at lto-cgraph.c:300 for OpenMP's simd reduction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/59237] FAIL: ext/random/hypergeometric_distribution/operators/values.cc (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59237 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/57904] [4.9 Regression] Bogus(?) "invokes undefined behavior" warning with Fortran's finalization wrapper (gfortran.dg/class_48.f90)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57904 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- We have: : ubound.0_3 = 0; size.1_4 = ubound.0_3 + 1; size.1_5 = MAX_EXPR ; _6 = size.1_5 * 4; _7 = (character(kind=4)) _6; _8 = MAX_EXPR <_7, 1>; sizes_9 = __builtin_malloc (_8); size.3_10 = MAX_EXPR ; _11 =

[Bug c++/58647] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with function pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58647 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Nov 27 15:55:18 2013 New Revision: 205449 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205449&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2013-11-27 Paolo Carlini PR c++/58647 * semantics

[Bug target/59305] [4.9 Regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c fails with WARNING: program timed out on x86_64-apple-darwin13

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59305 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- For powerpc see: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-11/msg00131.html - the failures indicate the architecture maintainers have not yet added this hook.

[Bug c++/58647] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with function pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58647 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/57904] [4.9 Regression] Bogus(?) "invokes undefined behavior" warning with Fortran's finalization wrapper (gfortran.dg/class_48.f90)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57904 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz

[Bug c/59316] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c FAILs on Solaris/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- See: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-11/msg00131.html - the failures indicate the architecture maintainers have not yet added this hook (for either SPARC, or ARM, or any non-x86 architecture)

[Bug rtl-optimization/59317] New: [4.9 Regression] [LRA,MIPS] ICE: in check_rtl, at lra.c (insn does not satisfy constraints)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59317 Bug ID: 59317 Summary: [4.9 Regression] [LRA,MIPS] ICE: in check_rtl, at lra.c (insn does not satisfy constraints) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/59316] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c FAILs on Solaris/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug rtl-optimization/57410] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in emit_spill_move, at lra-constraints.c:863 with -fpeel-loops and uninitialised variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57410 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Wed Nov 27 16:30:48 2013 New Revision: 205451 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205451&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-11-27 Vladimir Makarov PR rtl-optimization/57410 * gc

[Bug c/59316] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c FAILs on Solaris/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Feel free to add a comment mentioning the hook targets need to define for this test to pass.

[Bug rtl-optimization/57410] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in emit_spill_move, at lra-constraints.c:863 with -fpeel-loops and uninitialised variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57410 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/58125] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in operator[], at vec.h:827 with -fno-inline-small-functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58125 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 f

[Bug tree-optimization/59014] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59014 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 27 17:03:27 2013 New Revision: 205454 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205454&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/59014 * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr59014-2.c: New

[Bug tree-optimization/59014] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59014 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 27 17:05:21 2013 New Revision: 205456 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205456&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2013-11-26 Jakub Jelinek PR tree-o

[Bug tree-optimization/59014] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59014 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 27 17:06:44 2013 New Revision: 205457 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205457&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/59014 * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr59014-2.c: New

[Bug c++/59131] Compiler segfaults while generating code to save local variables in transactional section

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59131 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|2013-11-14 00:00:

[Bug c++/59131] Compiler segfaults while generating code to save local variables in transactional section

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59131 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez --- FWIW, also works on 4.8.

[Bug target/56788] _mm_frcz_sd and _mm_frcz_ss ignore their second argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56788 --- Comment #15 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Nov 27 18:07:22 2013 New Revision: 205458 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205458&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/56788 * gcc.target/i386/xop-frczX.c: New test.

[Bug target/59316] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c FAILs on Solaris/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/59318] New: ICE on invalid C++ code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59318 Bug ID: 59318 Summary: ICE on invalid C++ code Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: un

[Bug debug/59319] New: gcc does not emit DW_AT_friend or DW_TAG_friend

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59319 Bug ID: 59319 Summary: gcc does not emit DW_AT_friend or DW_TAG_friend Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug rtl-optimization/59311] [4.9 Regression] LRA fails to update REG_CFA_SET_VDRAP note

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- A small testcase compiled with -std=c++1y -m32: -- namespace std { typedef long unsigned int size_t; } namespace std { template class initializer_list { public: typedef size_t size_type;

[Bug regression/59320] New: ftree-vrp breaks simple loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59320 Bug ID: 59320 Summary: ftree-vrp breaks simple loops Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: regression

[Bug rtl-optimization/59311] [4.9 Regression] LRA fails to update REG_CFA_SET_VDRAP note

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- LRA calls (gdb) bt #0 elimination_costs_in_insn (insn=0x71a30ee8) at /export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/reload1.c:3694 #1 0x00d0419f in calculate_elim_costs_all_insns () at /export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gc

[Bug regression/59320] ftree-vrp breaks simple loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59320 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- What is the size of fl ?

[Bug regression/59320] ftree-vrp breaks simple loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59320 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > What is the size of fl ? What I mean are you going past the bounds of the array fl?

[Bug rtl-optimization/59311] [4.9 Regression] LRA fails to update REG_CFA_SET_VDRAP note

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- /* Terminate the search in check_eliminable_occurrences at this point. */ *recog_data.operand_loc[i] = 0; sets DEST to NULL.

[Bug regression/59320] ftree-vrp breaks simple loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59320 --- Comment #3 from David Kaufmann --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > > What is the size of fl ? > > What I mean are you going past the bounds of the array fl? yes, i am, but if the co

[Bug rtl-optimization/59311] [4.9 Regression] LRA fails to update REG_CFA_SET_VDRAP note

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- remove_pseudos in lra-spills.c failed to handle REG_CFA_SET_VDRAP note.

[Bug rtl-optimization/59311] [4.9 Regression] LRA fails to update REG_CFA_SET_VDRAP note

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- This pa

[Bug fortran/34740] -fbounds-check with TRANSFER misses out of bounds in array assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34740 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2009-03-29 08:22:06 |2013-11-27 CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/59311] [4.9 Regression] LRA fails to update REG_CFA_SET_VDRAP note

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 31313 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31313&action=edit A patch I am testing this patch.

  1   2   >