http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59273
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59297
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Breakpoint 5, verify_gimple_stmt (stmt=)
at /home/marek/src/gcc/gcc/tree-cfg.c:4296
4296{
(gdb) call debug_gimple_stmt(stmt)
<<< Unknown GIMPLE statement: gimple_with_cleanup_expr >>>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58950
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58314
--- Comment #17 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Although not fully tested yet, could you guys please have a look at it?
> Christian, does it fix your Linux build problems, or are there still more /
> new ones?
the 2.6.32 kernel build is fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59245
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59287
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 26 09:04:44 2013
New Revision: 205380
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205380&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-26 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/59287
* tree-s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59287
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59245
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59290
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59289
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.9.0
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59229
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59298
Bug ID: 59298
Summary: ICE when initialising PARAMETER array of derived-type
(containing an array) using array constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59298
Adam Hirst changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31294|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59229
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 31296
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31296&action=edit
gcc49-pr59229.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59286
--- Comment #5 from Kostya Serebryany ---
> However, building a tsan instrumented CP2K is non-trivial, as it requires
Maybe let's do some remote debugging then :)
The crash looks like someone corrupted the internal tsan's memory.
Can you insert
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59298
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59154
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
H.J., can you please verify whether this is fixed now? Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59296
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59166
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59288
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
I have a fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58700
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Nov 26 11:31:46 2013
New Revision: 205389
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205389&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-11-26 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58700
* decl.c (g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58700
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59166
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
In *.asmcons we still have correct:
(debug_insn 30 29 31 7 (var_location:HI D#1 (subreg:HI (reg/v:SI 93 [ p ]) 0))
pr59166.c:20 -1
(nil))
but in *.ira we have:
(debug_insn 30 29 31 7 (var_location:HI D#1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58314
--- Comment #18 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Tue Nov 26 11:48:16 2013
New Revision: 205390
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205390&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/58314
PR target/50751
* config/sh/sh.c (max_mov_insn_d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59249
--- Comment #4 from Bingfeng Mei ---
Even I split one critical predecessor edge, predicate of BB6 is still ORed
result of two conditions from BB4 & BB5. ORing two conditions results in a
sequence of statements that cannot be vectorized. Vectorizer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50751
--- Comment #32 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Tue Nov 26 11:48:16 2013
New Revision: 205390
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205390&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/58314
PR target/50751
* config/sh/sh.c (max_mov_insn_d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59166
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59286
--- Comment #6 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #5)
> > However, building a tsan instrumented CP2K is non-trivial, as it requires
>
> Maybe let's do some remote debugging then :)
We can give this a try, b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59273
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Created attachment 31293 [details]
> gcc49-pr59273.patch
>
> Untested fix.
I have started a native bootstrap + regtest on alpha.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59286
--- Comment #7 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #5)
> Maybe let's do some remote debugging then :)
For the current setup, the crash is always in StackDepotGet
The following printfs:
StackDesc *s = (S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59152
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53683
Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||3dw4rd at ve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Nov 26 13:31:25 2013
New Revision: 205392
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205392&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add -fuse-ld=bfd/-fuse-ld=gold support to exec-tool.in
PR bootst
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59286
--- Comment #8 from Kostya Serebryany ---
Just insert more printfs everywhere you can :)
E.g. print everything around "s->link = s2" in StackDepotPut
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59299
Bug ID: 59299
Summary: We do not sink loads
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59154
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56706
Bug 56706 depends on bug 59154, which changed state.
Bug 59154 Summary: [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check:
expected ssa_name, have integer_cst
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59154
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53683
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Ed Smith-Rowland from comment #4)
> It looks like libcpp/charset.c might have a lot of the guts that could help
> with the implementation of codecvt_utf8, etc.
>
> Maybe we could either get lib
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53683
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
We also have but it needs a lot of work to
re-use.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59286
--- Comment #9 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #8)
> Just insert more printfs everywhere you can :)
> E.g. print everything around "s->link = s2" in StackDepotPut
hmm I can write a lot of printfs, but it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 31299
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31299&action=edit
patch
Patch fixing the testcase (but otherwise untested - we don't have too many
internal fn testcases).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59300
Bug ID: 59300
Summary: visibility computation misses some attributes in
namespaces
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59286
--- Comment #10 from Joost VandeVondele
---
well, maybe a more simple reason. If I export
export OMP_STACKSIZE=32M
(i.e. stack size for the threads), the segfault disappears... does that sound
like a good reason (i.e. tsan instrumented binary mi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59290
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Nov 26 15:06:06 2013
New Revision: 205394
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205394&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc/]
2013-11-26 Kyrylo Tkachov
PR target/59290
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59290
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed on trunk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59290
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm |arm-*-*
Status|A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59245
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 26 15:14:52 2013
New Revision: 205395
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205395&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-26 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/59245
* tree-v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59245
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59301
Bug ID: 59301
Summary: Please enable -Wstrict-overflow as part of -Wextra
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59302
Bug ID: 59302
Summary: tsan: Unexpected mmap in InternalAllocator!
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: saniti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59303
Bug ID: 59303
Summary: [ARM/AArch32//AArch64] regressions in
uninit-pred-8_b.c and uninit-pred-9_b.c
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58874
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59150
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59304
Bug ID: 59304
Summary: #pragma diagnostic pop fails with -Wswitch-enum
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58860
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
...
Running
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc49-4.9.0-1000/gcc-4.9-20131126/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/atomic/atomic.exp
...
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c -O0 execution test
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c -O1 execution test
WARNING: program
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59305
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56066
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59285
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
After sleeping on it, I think a different approach to the fix is going to be
better. This is a latent bug in the RTL conditional execution/block merging
code.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59303
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm |
Version|unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59303
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[ARM/AArch32//AArch64] |uninit-pred-8_b.c and
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58950
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse ---
For:
void f(){
int i = 2;
(i+i);
}
we always set TREE_NOWARNING in finish_parenthesized_expr. The comment next to
it says this is to avoid warning in c_common_truthvalue_conversion. If that's
the only reas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57293
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov ---
The problem was fixed by a patch removing regmove and improving hardware
preferences in IRA.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53683
--- Comment #7 from Rui Maciel ---
Why is this bug marked as RESOLVED INVALID ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57293
--- Comment #8 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Sorry, ignore my previous comment. It should be for PR56339.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56339
--- Comment #16 from Vladimir Makarov ---
The problem was fixed by the patch removing regmove and improving hardware reg
preferences in IRA.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> Created attachment 31299 [details]
> Patch fixing the testcase (but otherwise untested - we don't have too many
> internal fn testcases).
Doesn't work for me. Wi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59152
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 26 20:38:10 2013
New Revision: 205410
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205410&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/59152
* omp-low.c (expand_omp_for_static_chunk): Don't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58874
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 26 20:39:56 2013
New Revision: 205412
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205412&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/58874
* parser.c (cp_parser_late_parsing_for_member): For Ope
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59150
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 26 20:38:59 2013
New Revision: 205411
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205411&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/59150
* omp-low.c (lower_rec_input_clause): For reduct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59166
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 26 20:54:37 2013
New Revision: 205413
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205413&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/59166
* ira.c (find_moveable_pseudos): Use DF_RE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59273
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 26 20:55:39 2013
New Revision: 205414
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205414&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/59273
* tree-vect-generic.c (optimize_vector_construct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59150
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59152
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58874
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59166
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59273
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59258
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 26 21:27:19 2013
New Revision: 205415
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205415&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/59258
* ubsan.c (ubsan_source_location): Don't add any
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59229
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 26 21:28:26 2013
New Revision: 205416
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205416&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/59229
* config/i386/i386.c (device_alg): Fix up formattin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59014
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 26 21:29:30 2013
New Revision: 205417
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205417&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/59014
* tree-vrp.c (register_edge_assert_for_1)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59258
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59229
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59014
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59208
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #6)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> > Created attachment 31299 [details]
> > Patch fixing the testcase (but otherwise untested - we don't have too many
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 31302
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31302&action=edit
Small test case: test.tar.gz
I managed to create a test case.
The attached test case is essentially attachment 3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57645
Dave Peterson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dspeterson at tagged dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57645
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Krügler ---
(In reply to Dave Peterson from comment #5)
In C++11 terminate is expected for this code, because the implied exception
specification of any destructor is noexcept(true), so throwing an exception
here is a ba
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59306
Bug ID: 59306
Summary: ICE with -fsanitize=null: gimple check: expected
gimple_call(error_mark), have gimple_assign(addr_expr)
in gimple_call_arg
Product: gcc
Vers
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59306
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53683
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Because your program is ill-formed, and not supposed to compile, so what you
reported is not a bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59306
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
More reduced:
// { dg-do compile }
// { dg-options "-fsanitize=undefined" }
class A {
void bar (void (A::*) (int));
void foo (int);
void B ();
};
void A::B()
{
bar (&A::foo);
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59307
Bug ID: 59307
Summary: ICE with boost::format and ubsan
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59304
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59304
--- Comment #2 from DJ Delorie ---
The diagnostic changes that happen with #pragmas are stored in a linear array,
which corresponds (somehow) to the linear input source file representation.
So, given a location in the source, we can find the spot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59307
larsbj at lyx dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||larsbj at lyx dot org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59304
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to DJ Delorie from comment #2)
> Once found, we scan backwards through the array looking for #pragmas that
> might affect the diagnostic. If we see one, that's what we use. If we see
> a DK_P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59286
--- Comment #11 from Kostya Serebryany ---
(In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #10)
> well, maybe a more simple reason. If I export
> export OMP_STACKSIZE=32M
> (i.e. stack size for the threads), the segfault disappears... does that
> so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59302
--- Comment #1 from Kostya Serebryany ---
This isn't expected to happen and so we did not write a better warning message.
We may be able to fix it, but the underlying problem is in your tests:
it has a race that tsan is trying to report and which
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
