http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59189
Bug ID: 59189
Summary: [SH] machine_dependent_reorg (sh_reorg) creates broken
basic block structures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59190
Bug ID: 59190
Summary: atomic ops on a non-escaped variable don't need
atomicity
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59175
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||areg.melikadamyan at gmail dot
com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59164
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 19 15:00:10 2013
New Revision: 205030
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205030&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-19 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/59164
* tree-v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59036
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59058
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50123
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
Is this fixed or do we want a tree-level optimization replacing one builtin
with a simpler one?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59164
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
Summary|[4.7/4.8/4.9 Re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59064
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59073
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59086
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59096
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59080
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59101
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59099
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59188
Dmitry Vyukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dvyukov at google dot com
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50123
Paolo Bonzini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59188
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Vyukov ---
> glibc (at least the 2.17 I have around) doesn't have sigsetjmp function at all
this must be fine, we do not call it if it's not used
> Not to mention that the arguments are wrong even for __sigsetjmp
setj
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59188
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59086
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59188
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry Vyukov ---
Great, thanks!
I will prepare a real patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59191
Bug ID: 59191
Summary: Accessibility of types not checked in template
functions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59193
Bug ID: 59193
Summary: Unused postfix operator temporaries
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c
A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59192
Bug ID: 59192
Summary: error: use of deleted function ‘A::A(const A&)’
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39200
bin.cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker.cheng at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58687
--- Comment #18 from Max TenEyck Woodbury ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #16)
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2013, mtewoodbury at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> > Could you all give me some idea on how soon this might be applied?
>
> At some t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47346
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||akim.demaille at gmail dot com
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59191
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39200
Paolo Bonzini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21676
Bug 21676 depends on bug 39200, which changed state.
Bug 39200 Summary: ivopts slows down SciMark sparse matrix benchmark
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39200
What|Removed |Added
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39201
Bug 39201 depends on bug 39200, which changed state.
Bug 39200 Summary: ivopts slows down SciMark sparse matrix benchmark
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39200
What|Removed |Added
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58687
--- Comment #19 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013, mtewoodbury at gmail dot com wrote:
> it's been a couple weeks. Any progress?
I don't recall seeing this on gcc-patches (any patch attached to Bugzilla
is taken as wo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59193
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
I see nothing at http://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html that would
apply such a C++ coding practice to the mostly C-like code in GCC.
Changes to coding conventions should be proposed on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59192
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini ---
I suspect this may be pretty hard to fix until std::deque gets a noexcept move
constructor. 4.6.x simply didn't have move_if_noexcept.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57709
--- Comment #9 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Something has changed in the C++ FE in the meanwhile. Could you try with this
one?
Index: name-lookup.c
===
--- name-lookup.c (revis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59142
Charles Baylis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charles.baylis at linaro dot
org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57709
Jan Kratochvil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31248|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59192
--- Comment #2 from Olaf Dietsche ---
I don't know how hard this is. When I replace deque with vector or list, it
compiles with all versions from 4.6 to 4.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59192
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It will get fixed when adding C++11 allocator support to std::deque, which is
in progress but not ready.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58944
Sriraman Tallam changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59194
Bug ID: 59194
Summary: tsan detects race for real variables in an OMP
reduction clause
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59189
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo ---
Hm, I found this one:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-12/msg00368.html
"The CFG is not valid at the point of the machine reorg pass, mainly
for historical reasons. You can see all the insns reliably by doing
fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59194
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think this is still a dup of bug 40362.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59194
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59195
Bug ID: 59195
Summary: C++ demangler handles conversion operator incorrectly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59195
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59153
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Nov 19 19:41:40 2013
New Revision: 205053
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205053&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2013-11-18 Uros Bizjak
* conf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59196
Bug ID: 59196
Summary: ./configure --with=cpu is broken for some m68k targets
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42145
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #5 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59196
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42145
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arequipeno at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 58698, which changed state.
Bug 58698 Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Spurious "may be used unitialized"
warning when compiling with -Os
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58698
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58698
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19794
Bug 19794 depends on bug 58698, which changed state.
Bug 58698 Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Spurious "may be used unitialized"
warning when compiling with -Os
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58698
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58455
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 58455, which changed state.
Bug 58455 Summary: spurious "may be used uninitialized" warning with -Og
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58455
What|Removed |Added
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19794
Bug 19794 depends on bug 58455, which changed state.
Bug 58455 Summary: spurious "may be used uninitialized" warning with -Og
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58455
What|Removed |Added
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59184
--- Comment #2 from Philippe Baril Lecavalier ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #1)
Thanks for the suggestions, which I will apply. I have to admit that this is my
first time with cvs, so I'm taking notes here. I just want to chec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42145
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rbd at debian dot org
--- Comment #7 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57072
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42145
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppluzhnikov at google dot com
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 57072, which changed state.
Bug 57072 Summary: bogus "is used uninitialized" warning
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57072
What|Removed |Added
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59196
--- Comment #2 from Miro Kropacek ---
Done. Thanks for testing!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59184
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Philippe Baril Lecavalier from comment #2)
> (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #1)
>
> Thanks for the suggestions, which I will apply. I have to admit that this is
> my first ti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59099
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Nov 19 22:53:06 2013
New Revision: 205061
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205061&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-19 Martin Jambor
PR rtl-optimization/59099
* ira.c (fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59099
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59189
--- Comment #2 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
It seems that simply there was no user of the valid CFG after m_d_r
pass.
> Maybe this should be fixed by putting the introduced unconditional
> branch instruction into a separate basic block.
Sounds plaus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59099
--- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Thanks, Martin.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 56705, which changed state.
Bug 56705 Summary: 4.8-20130319 misdiagnoses initialized var (regression from
4.7.2)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56705
What|Removed |Added
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56705
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55759
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42145
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bp at alien8 dot de
--- Comment #9 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 55759, which changed state.
Bug 55759 Summary: bogus warning when building drivers/ata/libata-core.c in
v3.7 of the linux kernel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55759
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 21733, which changed state.
Bug 21733 Summary: bogus uninitialized warning (huge testcase)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21733
What|Removed |Added
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45238
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21733
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32657
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36296
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 36296, which changed state.
Bug 36296 Summary: bogus uninitialized warning (loop representation, VRP
missed-optimization)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36296
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21733
Bug 21733 depends on bug 36296, which changed state.
Bug 36296 Summary: bogus uninitialized warning (loop representation, VRP
missed-optimization)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36296
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54954
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39936
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 39936, which changed state.
Bug 39936 Summary: [4.4 only] -Wuninitialized false positive with unhelpful
diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39936
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59193
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40146
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 40146, which changed state.
Bug 40146 Summary: Unexplained "'' is used uninitialized in this
function" warning
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40146
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59197
Bug ID: 59197
Summary: An alias from an always_inline function causes
inconsistent behavior
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 48801, which changed state.
Bug 48801 Summary: uninitialized warning for variables used only in loop body
and initialized in the first iteration
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48801
What|Remov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48801
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42145
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lacombar at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49848
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 49848, which changed state.
Bug 49848 Summary: False positive warning triggered by -Wmaybe-uninitialized
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49848
What|Removed |Added
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59006
Cong Hou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||congh at google dot com
--- Comment #5 from Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59198
Bug ID: 59198
Summary: ICE on cyclically dependent polymorphic types
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fort
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59199
Bug ID: 59199
Summary: [4.9 Regression] r205032 caused LTO bootstrap to fail
with bootstrap-profile
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59200
Bug ID: 59200
Summary: ICE with invalid alias template use
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59201
Bug ID: 59201
Summary: [4.9 Regression] error: stmt (0x7f01c4708130) marked
modified after optimization pass
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59202
Bug ID: 59202
Summary: Erroneous argument aliasing with defined assignment
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59201
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59196
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
101 - 200 of 218 matches
Mail list logo