http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29143
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29143
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Nov 16 09:54:42 2013
New Revision: 204899
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204899&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-11-16 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/29143
* semantics
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29143
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Nov 16 09:54:23 2013
New Revision: 204898
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204898&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-11-16 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/29143
* semantics
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59143
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #3)
> Early draft patch (fixes the test case but is not regtested yet):
Regtests cleanly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59151
Bug ID: 59151
Summary: gcc name lookup for friend template finds class
outside of
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59134
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59144
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> (In reply to tmmikolajczyk from comment #0)
> > The compilation passes (on gcc and clang). It's quite weird that the
> > virtualism of the "X::bar" method has
th: /mnt/svn/gcc-trunk//configure --enable-checking=yes,rtl,df
--enable-languages=c,c++,lto,fortran
--prefix=/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/binary-204897-lto-fortran-checking-yes-rtl-df/
--without-cloog --without-ppl
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20131116 (experimental) (GCC)
Tested revisions:
r204897 - crash
4.8 r204890 - OK
ing=yes,rtl,df
--enable-languages=c,c++,lto,fortran
--prefix=/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/binary-204897-lto-fortran-checking-yes-rtl-df/
--without-cloog --without-ppl
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20131116 (experimental) (GCC)
Tested revisions:
r204897 - crash
4.8 - doesn't know -flive-range-shrinkage
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56820
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56820
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gafunchal at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59151
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59144
--- Comment #3 from tmmikolajczyk at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> (In reply to tmmikolajczyk from comment #0)
> > The compilation passes (on gcc and clang). It's quite weird that the
> > virtualism of the "X::ba
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431
--- Comment #4 from George Galeev ---
Guys, how to get a look at this bug? I'm tired of reading 100500 warnings from
third-party libraries.
GCC-4.6, GCC-4.7, GCC-4.8, C++11
Gentoo Linux x86-64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59138
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59154
Bug ID: 59154
Summary: [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check:
expected ssa_name, have integer_cst
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59154
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
It is 465.tonto.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59139
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47347
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59155
Bug ID: 59155
Summary: ICE: in reg_overlap_mentioned_p, at rtlanal.c:1473
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59156
Bug ID: 59156
Summary: code miscompiled with -O2 -fpeel-loops
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||scottbaldwin at gmail dot com
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59157
Bug ID: 59157
Summary: "+f" constraint rejected: output constraint 0 must
specify a single register
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57241
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59156
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
-fno-strict-aliasing fixes it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53920
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48914
--- Comment #9 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
If this warning is given by the preprocessor during lexing, then this is a dup
of bug 53431.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59154
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54694
Valentin Ilie changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||valentin.ilie at gmail dot com
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58771
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sat Nov 16 21:44:56 2013
New Revision: 204907
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204907&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-16 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/58771
* trans-io.c (transfer_exp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59155
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
By the way, the following:
double f(double x){
asm volatile("":"+X"(x));
return x;
}
double g(){
return f(1.);
}
is rejected with:
c.c: In function 'g':
c.c:2:3: error: inconsistent operand constraints
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59142
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59137
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59137
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #2 from Andr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58099
--- Comment #23 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Sat Nov 16 23:13:31 2013
New Revision: 204908
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204908&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-16 Janus Weil
Backport from mainline
2013-09-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59142
--- Comment #3 from João M. S. Silva ---
OK, thanks, I will report in Ubuntu's.
The compiler says:
$ gcc --version
gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.8.1-10ubuntu8) 4.8.1
Should I report also in Linaro's? I'm not yet familiarized with Linaro's role
in gcc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34311
--- Comment #3 from Anthony Green ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #2)
> However, there is no guarantee in the Darwin m32 ABI that the stacked
> version of the structs will be appropriately aligned. So, either the
> testcase is wrong co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59158
Bug ID: 59158
Summary: stdcall function as template parameter cause assembler
error
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59158
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44282
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||741911404 at qq dot com
--- Comment #6 fr
41 matches
Mail list logo
