[Bug tree-optimization/59121] endless loop with -O2 -floop-parallelize-all

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59121 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/59121] endless loop with -O2 -floop-parallelize-all

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59121 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Created attachment 31211 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31211&action=edit sampling of f951 I am attaching a sampling of f951 in case someone can figure out what is going on.

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 --- Comment #18 from Jack Howarth --- Created attachment 31212 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31212&action=edit fix from llvm svn

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

tests132 === g++ Summary === # of expected passes962 # of unsupported tests264 /sw/src/fink.build/gcc49-4.9.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../xg++ version 4.9.0 20131113 (experimental) (GCC) === gcc tests === Running target uni

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #14 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Wed Nov 13 22:34:33 2013 New Revision: 204757 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204757&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR sanitizer/59009 * sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_p

[Bug sanitizer/59122] New: libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 causes duplicate symbol errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59122 Bug ID: 59122 Summary: libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 causes duplicate symbol errors Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/59122] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 causes duplicate symbol errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59122 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 31213 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31213&action=edit untested fix This seems to work for me in the cross, but it is a hack in any case (before and now with the patch)

[Bug middle-end/59119] Segfault in -fisolate-erroneous-paths pass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59119 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Wed Nov 13 23:10:34 2013 New Revision: 204760 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204760&root=gcc&view=rev Log: * PR middle-end/59119 * gimple-ssa-isolate-paths.c (find_implicit_err

[Bug middle-end/59119] Segfault in -fisolate-erroneous-paths pass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59119 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 --- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres --- On x86_64-apple-darwin13 the fix from llvm svn applied to gcc trunk at r204759 produces... Native configuration is x86_64-apple-darwin13.0.0 === gcc tests === Running target unix/-m32 FAIL:

[Bug c++/59056] ambiguous call to function templates overloads not diagnosed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59056 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid Status|UNCO

[Bug libstdc++/59087] Issues including complex.h in C++11/1y mode because of C's complex.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59087 Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||3dw4rd at ve

[Bug c++/59123] New: [c++11] can't forward-declare an object later defined constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59123 Bug ID: 59123 Summary: [c++11] can't forward-declare an object later defined constexpr Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/59124] New: [4.8 Regression] Wrong warnings "array subscript is above array bounds"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59124 Bug ID: 59124 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Wrong warnings "array subscript is above array bounds" Product: gcc Version: 4.8.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/57887] nested non-type template parameters not declared in this scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57887 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug c/59125] New: [4.8 regression] gcc triggers wrong strncpy_chk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59125 Bug ID: 59125 Summary: [4.8 regression] gcc triggers wrong strncpy_chk Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/59126] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59126 Bug ID: 59126 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/59056] ambiguous call to function template overloads not diagnosed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59056 --- Comment #7 from Walter Mascarenhas --- In itself, Richard's paragraph "Morally, the function should ambiguous... " implies that the code below is ambiguous. However, it compiles just fine with gcc 4.8.1, because gcc also takes into account the

[Bug c++/59056] ambiguous call to function template overloads not diagnosed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59056 --- Comment #8 from Richard Smith --- (In reply to Walter Mascarenhas from comment #7) > In itself, Richard's paragraph "Morally, the function should ambiguous... " > implies that the code below is ambiguous. However, it > compiles just fine with

[Bug tree-optimization/59102] [4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59102 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/59102] [4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59102 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Thu Nov 14 03:18:17 2013 New Revision: 204773 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204773&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/59102 * gimple-ssa-isolate-paths.c (insert_t

[Bug tree-optimization/59109] [4.9 regression] ICE in mark_reachable_handlers, at tree-eh.c:3826

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59109 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #2 fro

[Bug bootstrap/59094] [4.9 Regression] Cilk runtime library headers are installed into the general include directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59094 --- Comment #2 from Balaji V. Iyer --- Hi Dmitry, Can you please confirm if the following patch works for you? Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer. === --- libcilkrts/Makefile.in (revi

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #15 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- As of revision 204772, there are still problems on hppa-linux. libtool: compile: /home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc -nostdinc++ -L/home/dave

[Bug c++/58963] Does C++ need flag_complex_method = 2?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58963 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/58862] [4.9 Regression] LTO profiledbootstrap failure: lto1: ICE in edge_badness, at ipa-inline.c:1008

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

<    1   2