http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58937
Alexey Samsonov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eugeni.stepanov at gmail dot
com,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065
--- Comment #7 from Vittorio Zecca ---
I believe most times a code knows if and when the size of an array
must be nonzero,
so a zerosize array would raise suspicions in those cases.
Anyway in my opinion gfortran run time should detect when an
unal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58937
--- Comment #6 from Kostya Serebryany ---
adding attribute ctor to __asan_init is questionable
- windows has different syntax.
- running non-instrumented binary w/o calling __asan_init at startup is risky:
the binary may call memset/etc an touch s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59085
Bug ID: 59085
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58121
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58937
--- Comment #7 from Yury Gribov ---
(In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #6)
> adding attribute ctor to __asan_init is questionable
> - windows has different syntax.
We'll fix that (see the obsolete patch).
> - running non-instrumented bi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58937
--- Comment #8 from Evgeniy Stepanov ---
I'm a little surprised we did not run into this on Android yet - we use the
same LD_PRELOAD scheme there. Are you linking libasan with libpthread? This
might go away as libpthread constructors call one of t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59025
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Just had a quick look at 3dview.c and indeed, the only swap of arguments I see
is due to different SSA_NAME_VERSIONs being used by reassoc1 (that is not a
bug) and
then during copyprop5 when a stmt is folded u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57734
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Nov 12 09:21:45 2013
New Revision: 204697
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204697&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-11-12 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/57734
* pt.c (loo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57734
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59086
Bug ID: 59086
Summary: error: ‘asm’ operand has impossible constraints
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29143
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913
--- Comment #10 from Rodrigo Rodrigues ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #8)
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 08:39:15PM +, rrodrigues at poli dot ufrj.br
> wrote:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913
> >
> > --- Comment #7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59087
Bug ID: 59087
Summary: including complex.h in C++11/1y mode should not
include C's complex.h
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10474
--- Comment #15 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Nov 12 12:53:53 2013
New Revision: 204698
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204698&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-12 Martin Jambor
PR rtl-optimization/10474
* ira.c (i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59087
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
That's an extension, it is done on purpose for compatibility with C code. IMHO
the standard's decision to replace C's complex.h with something completely
unrelated was nonsense.
Did that cause real problems for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59084
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Nov 12 13:26:51 2013
New Revision: 204700
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Properly handle AVX256 unaligned load and store
PR target/59084
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58934
--- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #11 from Martin Jambor ---
[...]
> If anyone is willing to test the patch on any platform but especially
> on those which I could not, I'd be very grateful. Thanks.
I've
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58279
--- Comment #4 from Stupachenko Evgeny ---
Not reproduced on trunk(4.9) any more.
Still reproduced on 4.8.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59088
Bug ID: 59088
Summary: -mtune=core-avx2 doesn't turn on unaligned load/store
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59088
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Nov 12 13:52:08 2013
New Revision: 204701
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204701&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Turn on SEE unaligned load and store for Haswell
PR target/59088
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59088
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59084
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 08:13:14AM +, zeccav at gmail dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065
>
> --- Comment #7 from Vittorio Zecca ---
> I believe most times a code knows if an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59087
--- Comment #2 from Tomohiro Kashiwada ---
C's provides a macro named 'I' and this breaks existing codes.
ext/pod_char_traits.h
gcc4.8.2) http://melpon.org/wandbox/permlink/qb87YqrI7I4BAQRw
gcc4.7.3) http://melpon.org/wandbox/permlink/ighn7hGeL2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59088
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Nov 12 14:38:49 2013
New Revision: 204703
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204703&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Turn on SEE unaligned load and store for Haswell
Backported from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59088
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59087
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59089
Bug ID: 59089
Summary: sin and/or cos produce bogus results with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59089
--- Comment #1 from M Welinder ---
Version and arch details:
welinder@sherwood:~> gcc -v -Wall -O0 sc.c -lm
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.7/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-suse-linux
Confi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59089
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||octoploid at yandex dot com
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862
--- Comment #19 from Teresa Johnson ---
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:11 AM, tejohnson at google dot com
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862
>
> --- Comment #18 from Teresa Johnson ---
> Just hit this same error with cpu2006 b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065
--- Comment #9 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Unfortunately associated() does not allow unassociated array pointers as input
so your code works for allocatable arrays but not for array pointers.
Yes, a negative value for size() is good. It is a pity ther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
I've seen the same problem also in Inkscape. I will try to create a testcase.
Would it be possible Jeffrey to build one of these programs?
Thanks,
Martin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862
--- Comment #20 from Paulo J. Matos ---
Thanks for fixing this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||octoploid at yandex dot com
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I need testcases. "the kernel" or "x.org" isn't sufficient for a variety of
reasons.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #5)
> I need testcases. "the kernel" or "x.org" isn't sufficient for a variety of
> reasons.
Every program that uses a custom sig_handler which only handles
SIG
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
markus@x4 tmp % cat test.c
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
static sigjmp_buf jmpbuf;
static void
sig_handler (int signo)
{
siglongjmp (jmpbuf, 1);
}
int
main (void)
{
char *p = N
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59090
Bug ID: 59090
Summary: Broken debug information for a function containing
__sync_compare_and_swap
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #5 from Kostya Serebryany ---
So far we were not even able to reproduce it.
As I told in another thread, please apply any minimal #ifdef patch to
sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cc to make it compile (while keeping tests
running on x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59091
Bug ID: 59091
Summary: __builtin_trap calls abort for arm-linux-gnueabi
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862
--- Comment #21 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 31200
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31200&action=edit
libiberty patch to push lto-profiledbootstrap further
Additional patch to libiberty to fix some c++ casting warnin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862
--- Comment #22 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Teresa Johnson from comment #19)
> Since this was blocking my SPEC testing I took a look. The issue is
> that the new edge_count variable is declared as an int and is
> overflowing. It should be g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862
--- Comment #23 from Teresa Johnson ---
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:06 AM, ubizjak at gmail dot com
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862
>
> --- Comment #22 from Uroš Bizjak ---
> (In reply to Teresa Johnson from comment #19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59092
Bug ID: 59092
Summary: __builtin_trap calls abort for aarch64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59091
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
See https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-11/msg00291.html for more
information on the glibc failure.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093
Bug ID: 59093
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault compiling
F90 File
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58534
--- Comment #1 from abutcher at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: abutcher
Date: Tue Nov 12 20:17:33 2013
New Revision: 204714
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204714&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Refactor implicit function template implementation and fix 5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58536
--- Comment #3 from abutcher at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: abutcher
Date: Tue Nov 12 20:17:33 2013
New Revision: 204714
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204714&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Refactor implicit function template implementation and fix 5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58637
--- Comment #1 from abutcher at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: abutcher
Date: Tue Nov 12 20:17:33 2013
New Revision: 204714
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204714&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Refactor implicit function template implementation and fix 5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58549
--- Comment #6 from abutcher at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: abutcher
Date: Tue Nov 12 20:17:33 2013
New Revision: 204714
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204714&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Refactor implicit function template implementation and fix 5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58548
--- Comment #4 from abutcher at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: abutcher
Date: Tue Nov 12 20:17:33 2013
New Revision: 204714
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204714&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Refactor implicit function template implementation and fix 5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59054
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Tue Nov 12 20:55:58 2013
New Revision: 204718
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204718&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-12 Michael Meissner
PR target/59054
* config/rs600
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I see the segmentation fault from 4.4 up to trunk. The backtrace for revision
204648 is
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x000100109a88 in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment (expr1=,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58712
--- Comment #9 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Nov 12 21:33:06 2013
New Revision: 204720
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204720&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-12 Vladimir Makarov
PR other/58712
* ira-costs.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59092
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59094
Bug ID: 59094
Summary: [4.9 Regression] Cilk runtime library headers are
installed into the general include directory
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59094
Dmitry Gorbachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson ---
(In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #5)
> So far we were not even able to reproduce it.
Building gcc trunk as a cross to ppc64-linux reproduces the build failure for
me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59091
Marcus Shawcroft changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marcus.shawcroft at arm dot com
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59095
Bug ID: 59095
Summary: FAIL: TestMakeFunc on x32
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
Assignee: i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59096
Bug ID: 59096
Summary: [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with template attribute
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Should be fixed via recent commits. Specifically, we preserve the *0 for code
that wants to catch the null pointer deref.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58822
vlukas at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vlukas at gmx dot de
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59097
Bug ID: 59097
Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with invalid statement
expression as array size
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59098
Bug ID: 59098
Summary: Unwarranted warning: promoted ~unsigned is always
non-zero [-Wsign-compare]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: mino
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59099
Bug ID: 59099
Summary: Erroneous register allocation on 32-bit x86 using
regparm
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59098
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59100
Bug ID: 59100
Summary: requesting optimization of safe rotate function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
--- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #8)
> Should be fixed via recent commits. Specifically, we preserve the *0 for
> code that wants to catch the null pointer deref.
Well, if you had run the simpl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
--- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I ran the testcase you sent. It worked fine for me.
THe problems we're having are within the realm of normal development and they
will be resolved one way or another.
c-r204695-install
--enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20131112 (experimental) (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #7 from Kostya Serebryany ---
Is this fixed by http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204726&root=gcc&view=rev ?
/local/gcc-trunk
--with-mpfr=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --with-mpc=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--with-cloog=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20131112 (experimental) [trunk revision 204721] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O1 small.c; a.out
$ gcc-4.8.2 -Os small.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58534
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58536
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58637
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58548
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58549
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58533
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|error-recovery, |ice-on-valid-code
|ic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59100
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
IIRC we already added another safe rotate form this year based on a report by
Niels, you may want to search for that (maybe in the comment before
simplify_rotate in tree-ssa-forwprop.c).
Basically you are askin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59103
Bug ID: 59103
Summary: [OOP] Reject deallocate/intent(out) for polymorphic
var in PURE procedures (IR F08/0033)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
K
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
Bug ID: 59104
Summary: Wrong result with SIZE specification expression
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
--- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Damn it. Tested the wrong compiler.
The problem with your testcase Markus is you're simply not allowed to pass a
null pointer to sprintf, memcpy and a variety of other functions. Once you
execute code whi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59103
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
Actually, we also have to check whether finalizers are IMPURE for
nonpolymorphic TYPE. I think we currently don't do so.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I'll note further, that an implementation of sprintf, memcpy, etc could check
for a NULL pointer internally and raise a trap on their own rather than
dereferencing the invalid pointer and still be a conformi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
--- Comment #13 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #11)
> Damn it. Tested the wrong compiler.
>
> The problem with your testcase Markus is you're simply not allowed to pass a
> null pointer to sprintf, memcpy a
90 matches
Mail list logo
