[Bug target/52368] internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.c:326

2013-11-10 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52368 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/56853] GNU Fortran is not working

2013-11-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56853 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/57970] segfault in sched-deps.c

2013-11-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57970 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/59072] New: errc values are platform dependent but are used in error_condition

2013-11-10 Thread mustrumr97 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59072 Bug ID: 59072 Summary: errc values are platform dependent but are used in error_condition Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/59072] errc values are platform dependent but are used in error_condition

2013-11-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59072 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/57970] segfault in sched-deps.c

2013-11-10 Thread colanderman at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57970 --- Comment #4 from Chris King --- Sorry, not interested: like I said above, it's very difficult to trigger, and the only code I've been able to trigger it with is proprietary. You can either read sched-deps.c and understand the code path which f

[Bug c/59073] New: [4.9 Regression] ICE with missing increment in OpenMP for-loop

2013-11-10 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59073 Bug ID: 59073 Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE with missing increment in OpenMP for-loop Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/59073] [4.9 Regression] ICE with missing increment in OpenMP for-loop

2013-11-10 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59073 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug libstdc++/59072] errc values are platform dependent but are used in error_condition

2013-11-10 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59072 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/38199] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] missed optimization: I/O performance

2013-11-10 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199 --- Comment #27 from Jerry DeLisle --- Getting my self up to speed here. I reviewed what we have going on with this. Currently we call a function called eat_spaces to do what is needed. Naturally, to keep track of all the flags and counters, ea

[Bug c++/59074] New: incorrect "call of overloaded .. is ambiguous" error when changing base class to virtual

2013-11-10 Thread c...@tempest-sw.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59074 Bug ID: 59074 Summary: incorrect "call of overloaded .. is ambiguous" error when changing base class to virtual Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug libstdc++/59075] New: python pretty printer does not work at OS X

2013-11-10 Thread altimin at altimin dot ru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59075 Bug ID: 59075 Summary: python pretty printer does not work at OS X Product: gcc Version: 4.6.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: P3 Component: libst

[Bug rtl-optimization/57970] segfault in sched-deps.c

2013-11-10 Thread colanderman at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57970 --- Comment #5 from Chris King --- Would a unit test case be acceptable? That should be an easy way to evince this bug and I'd be glad to write one.

[Bug libstdc++/59075] python pretty printer does not work at OS X

2013-11-10 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59075 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug sanitizer/59063] [4.9 Regression] ASAN: segfault in __interceptor_clock_gettime

2013-11-10 Thread y.gribov at samsung dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59063 Yury Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||y.gribov at samsung dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug sanitizer/59063] [4.9 Regression] ASAN: segfault in __interceptor_clock_gettime

2013-11-10 Thread eugeni.stepanov at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59063 --- Comment #2 from Evgeniy Stepanov --- Weak symbols. Ouch. We should link with libasan with librt. In Clang, we add -lrt to the linker flags when we see -fsanitize=(address|thread|memory).

[Bug sanitizer/59063] [4.9 Regression] ASAN: segfault in __interceptor_clock_gettime

2013-11-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59063 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- I think in newer versions of glibc, clock_gettime is in libc.so now too.

[Bug regression/58985] [4.9 Regression]: gcc.dg/pr57518.c scan-rtl-dump-not ira REG_EQUIV...

2013-11-10 Thread wmi at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58985 --- Comment #9 from wmi at google dot com --- Backported r200720 to gcc 4.8 branch at r204660.

[Bug sanitizer/59063] [4.9 Regression] ASAN: segfault in __interceptor_clock_gettime

2013-11-10 Thread y.gribov at samsung dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59063 --- Comment #4 from Yury Gribov --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > I think in newer versions of glibc, clock_gettime is in libc.so now too. I think Andrew is right - clock_gettime is in libc nowadays. Should we wontfix this bug? A

[Bug target/24842] testsuite failure: gcc.dg/attr-weakref-1.c execution test

2013-11-10 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24842 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|FIXED

[Bug sanitizer/59063] [4.9 Regression] ASAN: segfault in __interceptor_clock_gettime

2013-11-10 Thread y.gribov at samsung dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59063 --- Comment #5 from Yury Gribov --- (In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #4) > I think Andrew is right - clock_gettime is in libc nowadays. Should we > wontfix this bug? A trivial WAR for users would be to add -lrt to cmdline. A patch to add lib

[Bug sanitizer/59063] [4.9 Regression] ASAN: segfault in __interceptor_clock_gettime

2013-11-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59063 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/59063] [4.9 Regression] ASAN: segfault in __interceptor_clock_gettime

2013-11-10 Thread y.gribov at samsung dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59063 --- Comment #7 from Yury Gribov --- Created attachment 31192 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31192&action=edit Proposed patch Does this patch make sense?

[Bug sanitizer/59063] [4.9 Regression] ASAN: segfault in __interceptor_clock_gettime

2013-11-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59063 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #7) > Created attachment 31192 [details] > Proposed patch > > Does this patch make sense? No. Just add it to STATIC_LIBASAN_LIBS (dunno about tsan, does it require the

[Bug c++/59076] New: std::to_string(int ) could not be found in GCC 4.8.2

2013-11-10 Thread chun-fu.yang at hp dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59076 Bug ID: 59076 Summary: std::to_string(int ) could not be found in GCC 4.8.2 Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug sanitizer/59063] [4.9 Regression] ASAN: segfault in __interceptor_clock_gettime

2013-11-10 Thread y.gribov at samsung dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59063 --- Comment #9 from Yury Gribov --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > No. Just add it to STATIC_LIBASAN_LIBS and make sure libasan is linked > against librt. Hm, I was under impression that these only get activated when user has spe

[Bug sanitizer/59063] [4.9 Regression] ASAN: segfault in __interceptor_clock_gettime

2013-11-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59063 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #9) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > > No. Just add it to STATIC_LIBASAN_LIBS and make sure libasan is linked > > against librt. > > Hm, I was under imp

[Bug sanitizer/59063] [4.9 Regression] ASAN: segfault in __interceptor_clock_gettime

2013-11-10 Thread eugeni.stepanov at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59063 --- Comment #11 from Evgeniy Stepanov --- (In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #4) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > > I think in newer versions of glibc, clock_gettime is in libc.so now too. > > I think Andrew is right - clock_get

[Bug c++/58752] [C++11] Bogus error: ambiguous class template instantiation

2013-11-10 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58752 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Krügler --- (In reply to Richard Smith from comment #4) Richard, could you please explain what precisely you meant with: "Deducing #1 from #2 gives T=const U, which results in a deduction failure because enable_if<...co

[Bug rtl-optimization/58997] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (affecting gcc trunk and 4.8.2)

2013-11-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58997 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 11 07:55:25 2013 New Revision: 204662 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204662&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2013-11-05 Jakub Jelinek PR rtl-opt

[Bug middle-end/58970] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: in get_bit_range, at expr.c:4562

2013-11-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58970 --- Comment #29 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 11 07:57:11 2013 New Revision: 204663 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204663&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2013-11-06 Jakub Jelinek PR middle

<    1   2