http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59059
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||congh at google dot com,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59058
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
For the vectorizer issue on trunk, this is enough:
int printf (const char *, ...);
short b = 0;
int
main ()
{
int c = 0;
l1:
b++;
c |= b;
if (b)
goto l1;
printf ("%d\n", c);
return 0;
}
Thi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59061
Bug ID: 59061
Summary: Port leaksanitizer
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59061
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59060
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59060
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
For completeness, the feature was added 2008-05-16 in r135410.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59060
--- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele
---
Thanks, I indeed start thinking gfortran has it right.
As a small variant:
MODULE M1
TYPE T1
INTEGER, PRIVATE :: I=0
END TYPE T1
TYPE T2
TYPE(T1) :: D1
END TYPE T2
TYPE(T2), PARAMETER :: D2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59039
--- Comment #24 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Does it look OK?
Mostly, but I wouldn't go into full details about what contains the buffer,
this is machine-specific and not portable. Maybe something like:
"The @code{setjmp} buffer is an array of five
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58982
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Nov 9 12:38:00 2013
New Revision: 204615
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204615&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/58982
* include/bits/stl_algobase.h (__copy_move::__co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58982
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|ASSIGN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59056
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I must be misunderstanding something, because rewriting the class template
partial specializations as function templates (as per [temp.class.order]) shows
that one is more specialized than the other, as the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59060
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59059
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59050
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59061
--- Comment #1 from Kostya Serebryany ---
It should be there already:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204368&root=gcc&view=rev
Please check.
admittedly, the gcc tree lacks the tests for lsan.
4.9.0 20131109 (experimental) [trunk revision 204611] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O0 small.c
$ time a.out
1.02user 0.00system 0:01.05elapsed 97%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 1584maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+142minor)pagefaults 0swaps
$ gcc-trunk -O1 small.c
$ time a.out
0.68user 0.00system 0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59061
--- Comment #2 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #1)
> It should be there already:
triggering my report was indeed some vague memory that the recent merge would
bring leaksanitizer... I didn't see it mentio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59061
--- Comment #3 from Kostya Serebryany ---
https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/LeakSanitizer
I agree, we need to update the gcc doc to mention the URL above.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59061
--- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele
---
That's great... works even for Fortran code :-)
One more question the docs mention:
In performance-critical scenarios, LSan can also be used without ASan
instrumentation.
But it is unclear from that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58985
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59063
Bug ID: 59063
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ASAN: segfault in
__interceptor_clock_gettime
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15357
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052
Bug 14052 depends on bug 15357, which changed state.
Bug 15357 Summary: [tree-ssa] combing if statements
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15357
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15241
Bug 15241 depends on bug 15357, which changed state.
Bug 15357 Summary: [tree-ssa] combing if statements
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15357
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15352
Bug 15352 depends on bug 15357, which changed state.
Bug 15357 Summary: [tree-ssa] combing if statements
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15357
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15911
Bug 15911 depends on bug 15357, which changed state.
Bug 15357 Summary: [tree-ssa] combing if statements
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15357
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15353
Bug 15353 depends on bug 15357, which changed state.
Bug 15357 Summary: [tree-ssa] combing if statements
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15357
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15348
Bug 15348 depends on bug 15357, which changed state.
Bug 15357 Summary: [tree-ssa] combing if statements
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15357
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13965
Bug 13965 depends on bug 15357, which changed state.
Bug 15357 Summary: [tree-ssa] combing if statements
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15357
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23869
Bug 23869 depends on bug 15357, which changed state.
Bug 15357 Summary: [tree-ssa] combing if statements
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15357
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58956
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51988
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57836
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57883
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57859
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57890
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-linux-gnu
Component|tre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57946
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.4.5
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57847
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57999
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58116
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think there is a duplicated bug of this already.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25179
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24842
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30775
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34881
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34803
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56584
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53489
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53969
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53092
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52334
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49435
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50397
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59049
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
We do have a missed optimization due to fab being done so late.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57890
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 55953 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55953
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59061
--- Comment #5 from Kostya Serebryany ---
(In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #4)
> That's great... works even for Fortran code :-)
Wow!
>
> One more question the docs mention:
>
> In performance-critical scenarios, LSan can also be u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199
--- Comment #26 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Test case from Comment #22
ifort:
real0m0.608s
user0m0.464s
sys0m0.080s
gfortran:
real0m22.893s
user0m21.059s
sys0m0.152s
Obviously we could do better.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47740
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patches should goto gcc-patches@ rather than here.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47756
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47842
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47929
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47960
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48099
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
What front-end requires flag_evaluation_order now?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47779
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48474
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Also don't patches goto gcc-patches@ .
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48782
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47930
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49046
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49034
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49207
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47739
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49376
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49370
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49449
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24830
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27526
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29691
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28536
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24839
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28188
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41559
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30592
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38766
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43063
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18885
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48485
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42885
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51764
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33591
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24420
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56105
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26446
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56390
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44661
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37927
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41253
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31845
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27348
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo