[Bug preprocessor/58687] "#line __LINE__ ..." changes subsequent line numbers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58687 --- Comment #1 from Max TenEyck Woodbury --- Created attachment 31080 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31080&action=edit test case Comment out the '#line' directives and it compiles without error...

[Bug rtl-optimization/58826] Runfail on CPU2006 436.cactusADM with after r203377 for core-avx2 target.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58826 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/58826] [4.9 Regression] Runfail on CPU2006 436.cactusADM with after r203377 for core-avx2 target.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58826 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/58843] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with broken destructor call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58843 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/58846] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE redeclaring __dso_handle

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58846 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/58835] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ in broken function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58835 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/58837] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE using invalid condition in static_assert

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58837 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4

[Bug bootstrap/58840] Problem compiling gcc 4.7.3 using gcc 4.4.6

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58840 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 --- Comment #7 from Damian Rouson --- Any updates on this PR? I'm teaching a graduate course on modern Fortran and will be using this feature in class. It would be great to have an open-source compiler that supports the feature.

[Bug tree-optimization/58832] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 64-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58832 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/58831] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 64-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58831 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/58830] [4.8 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (affecting 4.8.x, but not trunk or 4.7.x)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58830 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Known to work|

[Bug c/39589] make -Wmissing-field-initializers=2 work with "designated initializers" ?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39589 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/58828] Problem compiling gcc 4.8.2 using gcc 4.4.6

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58828 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/58848] constexpr function allows throw

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58848 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug testsuite/58851] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_13.f90 -O0 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58851 Bug ID: 58851 Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_13.f90 -O0 execution test Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/58822] Segfault when calling make_shared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58822 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|michi at triodia dot com | --- Comment #14 from Paolo Carlin

[Bug libstdc++/58850] Conversion error in chrono

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58850 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|galens at capaccess dot org| --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini

[Bug libstdc++/58850] Conversion error in chrono

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58850 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini --- Jon, shall we change this?

[Bug tree-optimization/58830] [4.8 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (affecting 4.8.x, but not trunk or 4.7.x)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58830 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||57488 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener

[Bug fortran/58852] New: ASSOCIATE returns nothing after changing the value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58852 Bug ID: 58852 Summary: ASSOCIATE returns nothing after changing the value Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug rtl-optimization/58831] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 64-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58831 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |rtl-optimization --- Comment #3 from Ric

[Bug testsuite/58851] FAIL: gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_13.f90 -O0 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58851 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/58831] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 64-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58831 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Btw, at some point during DSE true_dependence_1 still returns true for (mem/f/c:DI (symbol_ref:DI ("r") ) [3 r+0 S8 A64]) (mem/f:DI (reg/v/f:DI 90 [ p2 ]) [3 *p2_9(D)+0 S8 A64]) but later when sched2 asks (

[Bug middle-end/58742] [4.7/4.8 Regression] pointer arithmetic simplification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58742 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression]|[4.7/4.8 Regression] |

[Bug rtl-optimization/58831] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 64-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58831 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug libstdc++/58815] Casting/Conversion operator for std::decimal not supported

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58815 --- Comment #16 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Oct 23 11:48:26 2013 New Revision: 203956 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203956&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-10-23 Paolo Carlini PR libstdc++/58815 * includ

[Bug libstdc++/58815] Casting/Conversion operator for std::decimal not supported

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58815 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/58744] Illegal Memory Access on 3-byte packed struct ARCH: x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58744 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target|

[Bug libstdc++/58822] Segfault when calling make_shared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58822 --- Comment #15 from Michi Henning --- OK, glad you are seeing it too. I initially opened this as a library issue because I thought make_shared is to blame. But maybe not. Should I reassign to C++?

[Bug tree-optimization/58830] [4.8 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (affecting 4.8.x, but not trunk or 4.7.x)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58830 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/57488] [4.9 regression] loop terminates early at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57488 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Oct 23 11:59:05 2013 New Revision: 203958 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203958&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-10-23 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2013-06-24

[Bug tree-optimization/57488] [4.9 regression] loop terminates early at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57488 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||su at cs dot ucdavis.edu --- Comment #7

[Bug c++/58822] Segfault when calling make_shared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58822 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Component|libstdc++ |c++ --- Comment #16 from Paolo Carlini -

[Bug c++/58822] Segfault when calling make_shared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58822 --- Comment #17 from Paolo Carlini --- Also, since apparently this isn't a library issue, it would be nice to figure out a reduced testcase not including .

[Bug c++/58822] Segfault when calling make_shared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58822 --- Comment #18 from Michi Henning --- Hmmm... That might be difficult because, as soon as I don't use make_shared, the problem goes away. (With the virtual inheritance in place but a call to shared_ptr(args), as in the commented-out line in Unity

[Bug rtl-optimization/58542] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Arguments of __atomic_* functions are converted in unsigned mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58542 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW URL|http://gcc.gnu.org/m

[Bug c++/58822] Segfault when calling make_shared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58822 --- Comment #19 from Paolo Carlini --- I'm pretty sure it isn't. It's easy to see why: in the testcase are you using *all* the facilities provided by std::shared_ptr as standardized? I don't think so! Thus just imagine having the class there, and

[Bug c++/58822] Segfault when calling make_shared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58822 --- Comment #20 from Michi Henning --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #19) > I'm pretty sure it isn't. It's easy to see why: in the testcase are you > using *all* the facilities provided by std::shared_ptr as standardized? I > don't think

[Bug c++/58822] Segfault when calling make_shared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58822 --- Comment #21 from Paolo Carlini --- You could start from the .ii: edit it, delete all the things you don't use. Or start by removing the inclusion of and adding to the testcase a mini-version of std::shared_ptr, with bits copied from . See wha

[Bug target/58442] bootstrapping vax crashes on NetBSD

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58442 --- Comment #9 from Martin Husemann --- Please correct me if I am wrong, but in the bitfield cotexts in vax.md there are multiple places with similar constructs like: 219&& (REG_P (operands[0]) 220|| ! mode_dependent_address_p

[Bug tree-optimization/58805] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Inline assembly wrongly optimized out when inside a conditional

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58805 --- Comment #17 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Wed Oct 23 13:26:45 2013 New Revision: 203973 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203973&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Add missing check in stmt_local_def for tail-merge. 2013-10-22

[Bug libstdc++/58850] Conversion error in chrono

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58850 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/46936] turn __attribute__ ((nonnull (x))) into assert in debug mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46936 Ondrej Bilka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||neleai at seznam dot cz --- Comment #1 fro

[Bug c++/58822] Segfault when calling make_shared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58822 --- Comment #23 from Paolo Carlini --- Thanks Manuel, I knew we had something.

[Bug rtl-optimization/58853] New: [4.9 regression] ICE after r203937

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58853 Bug ID: 58853 Summary: [4.9 regression] ICE after r203937 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimizatio

[Bug c++/58822] Segfault when calling make_shared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58822 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/58828] Problem compiling gcc 4.8.2 using gcc 4.4.6

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58828 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Fruzynski --- Thanks for reply. As I checked, this also happens when compiling using gcc 4.7.3, so looks that this is more general problem. File [path]/gcc/obj/gcc/config.status contains following entry: configured by

[Bug target/58838] mullw sets condition code incorrectly.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58838 --- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn --- Author: dje Date: Wed Oct 23 14:32:32 2013 New Revision: 203977 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203977&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/58838 * config/rs6000/rs6000.md (mulsi3_internal1 a

[Bug rtl-optimization/58853] [4.9 regression] ICE after r203937

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58853 Igor Zamyatin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at ucw dot cz,

[Bug rtl-optimization/58853] [4.9 regression] ICE after r203937

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58853 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/58359] __builtin_unreachable prevents vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58359 --- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Anatoly Sinyavin from comment #3) > So I suggest processing __builtin_unreachable immediately after "cfg" pass > (cfg buiding). That seems awfully early. Don't we want to at least wait until after

[Bug fortran/58852] ASSOCIATE returns nothing after changing the value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58852 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug libstdc++/58850] Conversion error in chrono

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58850 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Oct 23 15:31:26 2013 New Revision: 203978 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203978&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-10-23 Paolo Carlini PR libstdc++/58850 * include

[Bug libstdc++/58850] Conversion error in chrono

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58850 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/58851] FAIL: gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_13.f90 -O0 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58851 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/58359] __builtin_unreachable prevents vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58359 --- Comment #9 from Anatoly Sinyavin --- Created attachment 31082 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31082&action=edit Patch for new solution

[Bug tree-optimization/58359] __builtin_unreachable prevents vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58359 --- Comment #8 from Anatoly Sinyavin --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #7) > (In reply to Anatoly Sinyavin from comment #3) > > So I suggest processing __builtin_unreachable immediately after "cfg" pass > > (cfg buiding). > > That seems a

[Bug tree-optimization/58775] [4.9 Regression] reassoc1 causes an ICE with some bool arithmetic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58775 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Oct 23 16:19:17 2013 New Revision: 203979 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203979&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/58775 PR tree-optimization/58791 * tree-ssa

[Bug tree-optimization/58791] [4.9 Regression] Reassoc reuses SSA_NAMEs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58791 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Oct 23 16:19:17 2013 New Revision: 203979 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203979&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/58775 PR tree-optimization/58791 * tree-ssa

[Bug c++/51253] [C++11][DR 1030] Evaluation order (sequenced-before relation) among initializer-clauses in braced-init-list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51253 Stephan Tolksdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||st at quanttec dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug fortran/58852] ASSOCIATE returns nothing after changing the value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58852 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus --- I can confirm that it fails with GCC 4.7.3. I think it is fixed by the patch for PR 55134 (i.e. for GCC 4.8). Can you try a newer version of GCC? Cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinaries

[Bug target/58854] New: [ARM 4.8 regression] "sub sp, fp, #40" hoisted above frame accesses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854 Bug ID: 58854 Summary: [ARM 4.8 regression] "sub sp, fp, #40" hoisted above frame accesses Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug target/58854] [ARM 4.8 regression] "sub sp, fp, #40" hoisted above frame accesses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854 --- Comment #1 from bccheng at android dot com --- Created attachment 31083 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31083&action=edit stripped from kernel 3.4 fs/dcache.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/58542] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Arguments of __atomic_* functions are converted in unsigned mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58542 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigne

[Bug target/58854] [4.8 regression] "sub sp, fp, #40" hoisted above frame accesses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target|

[Bug target/58853] [4.9 regression] ICE in expand_set_or_movmem_prologue_epilogue_by_misaligned_moves

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58853 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org Com

[Bug c++/58855] New: Attributes ignored on type alias in template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58855 Bug ID: 58855 Summary: Attributes ignored on type alias in template Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/54812] [C++11] Delete expression doesn't respect access of defaulted destructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54812 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/58828] Problem compiling gcc 4.8.2 using gcc 4.4.6

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58828 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Fruzynski --- OK, I found it. I used script symlink-tree (distributed with binutils) to create symlinks to binutils in gcc source dir. This script removed some gcc source files and replaced them with symlinks to correspo

[Bug bootstrap/58840] Problem compiling gcc 4.7.3 using gcc 4.4.6

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58840 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Fruzynski --- OK, I found this. I used script symlink-tree to create symlinks to binutils in gcc src dir. This script replaced some files with symlinks to their counterparts in binutil dir, what caused this problem. gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/58805] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Inline assembly wrongly optimized out when inside a conditional

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58805 --- Comment #18 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Wed Oct 23 19:16:55 2013 New Revision: 203990 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203990&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Add missing check in stmt_local_def for tail-merge. 2013-10-23

[Bug bootstrap/58840] Problem compiling gcc 4.7.3 using gcc 4.4.6

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58840 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/58856] New: [4.9 Regression] spurious 'wrong number of template arguments' error for template alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58856 Bug ID: 58856 Summary: [4.9 Regression] spurious 'wrong number of template arguments' error for template alias Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Se

[Bug c++/58856] [4.9 Regression] spurious 'wrong number of template arguments' error for template alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58856 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/58851] FAIL: gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_13.f90 -O0 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58851 --- Comment #3 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- I had changed the testcase to: ! { dg-do run } ! ! PR fortran/58793 ! ! Contributed by Vladimir Fuka ! ! Had the wrong value for the storage_size for complex ! module m use iso_fortr

[Bug testsuite/58851] FAIL: gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_13.f90 -O0 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58851 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #3) > I had changed the testcase to: ... which is in the essential part the same. (I had a few more checks, but those do not really matter.) > Is it no

[Bug target/57756] Function target attribute is retaining state of previously seen function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57756 --- Comment #5 from tmsriram at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: tmsriram Date: Wed Oct 23 21:13:50 2013 New Revision: 203991 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203991&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/57756 Replace further references to global_opti

[Bug fortran/58857] New: [OOP] CLASS wrongly rejected in BLOCK DATA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58857 Bug ID: 58857 Summary: [OOP] CLASS wrongly rejected in BLOCK DATA Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal Priori

[Bug fortran/58858] New: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_8.f90 fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58858 Bug ID: 58858 Summary: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_8.f90 fails Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code Severity: normal Priori

[Bug c/46936] turn __attribute__ ((nonnull (x))) into assert in debug mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46936 Brooks Moses changed: What|Removed |Added CC||brooks at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug c++/58859] New: throwing exceptions in destructors causes std::terminate called too early.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58859 Bug ID: 58859 Summary: throwing exceptions in destructors causes std::terminate called too early. Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug c++/58859] throwing exceptions in destructors causes std::terminate called unnecessarily.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58859 --- Comment #1 from meng at g dot clemson.edu --- made a typo just now. "and g++-4.8.0 with c++11 flag, " should read "and g++-4.8.0 without c++11 flag, " i.e., the problem only happens when c++11 is enabled with g++-4.8.0.

[Bug c++/58859] throwing exceptions in destructors causes std::terminate called unnecessarily.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58859 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- Try adding noexcept(false) on the destructor?

[Bug c++/58859] throwing exceptions in destructors causes std::terminate called unnecessarily.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58859 --- Comment #3 from meng at g dot clemson.edu --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #2) > Try adding noexcept(false) on the destructor? that works. Thanks. but this causes another question. c++11 15.4/12 states "A function with no exception-s

[Bug c++/58859] throwing exceptions in destructors causes std::terminate called unnecessarily.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58859 --- Comment #4 from meng at g dot clemson.edu --- ok, I think I missed 15.4/4 and 12.4/3, which means the dtor in my example should allow no exceptions, i.e., noexcept(true). Thanks again.