[Bug sanitizer/58420] internal compiler error: in ubsan_type_descriptor, at ubsan.c:280

2013-09-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58420 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/58420] internal compiler error: in ubsan_type_descriptor, at ubsan.c:280

2013-09-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58420 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Though, could you provide some preprocessed testcase? At any rate, I think it's because ubsan_type_descriptor doesn't handle IDENTIFIER_NODEs very well, this should be fixed as a side effect of http://gcc.gnu

[Bug sanitizer/58413] ubsan constant folding

2013-09-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58413 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug sanitizer/58420] internal compiler error: in ubsan_type_descriptor, at ubsan.c:280

2013-09-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58420 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug sanitizer/58411] no_sanitize_undefined function attribute

2013-09-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58411 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/57370] [4.9 Regression] compiler hangs in reassoc

2013-09-14 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57370 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/56873] vector shift lowered to scalars

2013-09-14 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56873 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |middle-end --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse

[Bug target/58421] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20051216-1.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer (internal compiler error)

2013-09-14 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58421 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug target/58421] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20051216-1.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer (internal compiler error)

2013-09-14 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58421 Bug ID: 58421 Summary: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20051216-1.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer (internal compiler error) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0

[Bug target/55926] Internal compiler error with static volatile pointer

2013-09-14 Thread pch at laposte dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55926 --- Comment #2 from pch at laposte dot net --- I can neither reproduce the anomaly with 4.8.1. Anyway I did not raise the issue because it was blocking for me. I had just hope it could help to locate and fix an anomaly in gcc.

[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

2013-09-14 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269 --- Comment #22 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Sat Sep 14 11:09:55 2013 New Revision: 202590 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202590&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc: PR target/58269 config/i386/i386.c (ix86_function_arg_regno_p):

[Bug target/44107] gcc emits frame (epilogue) info incompatible with the darwin {8,9}-unwinder,10-compacter

2013-09-14 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107 --- Comment #25 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to David Fang from comment #22) > Do one of these apple libunwind sources (0.30, 0.35.1) correspond to what's > bundled in libgcc_s in darwin8,9,10? > > http://opensource.apple.com/tarballs/libunwind

[Bug java/41991] gcj segfaults on i686-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin9

2013-09-14 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41991 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/44107] gcc emits frame (epilogue) info incompatible with the darwin {8,9}-unwinder,10-compacter

2013-09-14 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107 --- Comment #26 from Iain Sandoe --- *** Bug 41991 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug objc/44488] objc test inconsistencies w/ / w/out --enable-build-with-cxx

2013-09-14 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44488 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/48094] ld: warning: section has unexpectedly large size errors in objc/obj-c++ lto

2013-09-14 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48094 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Component|lto |target --- Comment #18 from Iain Sandoe --

[Bug target/48094] ld: warning: section has unexpectedly large size errors in objc/obj-c++ lto

2013-09-14 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48094 --- Comment #19 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Sat Sep 14 15:36:41 2013 New Revision: 202593 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202593&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc: PR target/48094 * config/darwin.c (darwin_objc2_section

[Bug target/48094] ld: warning: section has unexpectedly large size errors in objc/obj-c++ lto

2013-09-14 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48094 --- Comment #20 from Iain Sandoe --- fixed on trunk, but should be back-ported to 4.8/4.7.

[Bug target/48097] new Throw_2 failures in libjava under Xcode 4.0

2013-09-14 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48097 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/58256] gcc for h8300 internal compiler error: in maybe_record_trace_start

2013-09-14 Thread gang.chen at asianux dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58256 --- Comment #7 from Chen Gang --- Created attachment 30821 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30821&action=edit some simple modification based on the reduced .c file. After learning from what you have done, and give a little addi

[Bug target/58382] [4.9 Regression] unwind.inc:136:1: ICE: in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:55

2013-09-14 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58382 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Sep 14 16:58:01 2013 New Revision: 202594 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202594&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/58382 * config/pa/pa.c (pa_expand_prologue): Change

[Bug target/58382] [4.9 Regression] unwind.inc:136:1: ICE: in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:55

2013-09-14 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58382 --- Comment #5 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Sep 14 17:00:32 2013 New Revision: 202595 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202595&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/58382 * config/pa/pa.c (pa_expand_prologue): Change

[Bug target/58382] [4.9 Regression] unwind.inc:136:1: ICE: in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:55

2013-09-14 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58382 --- Comment #6 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Sep 14 17:03:32 2013 New Revision: 202596 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202596&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/58382 * config/pa/pa.c (pa_expand_prologue): Change

[Bug target/58382] [4.9 Regression] unwind.inc:136:1: ICE: in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:55

2013-09-14 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58382 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/58405] Unoptimal code generated for computed goto

2013-09-14 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58405 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/58405] Unoptimal code generated for computed goto

2013-09-14 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58405 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/58079] internal compiler error: in do_SUBST, at combine.c:711

2013-09-14 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58079 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug c++/58422] New: vector shift operations work in C but not C++

2013-09-14 Thread gabriel at teuton dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58422 Bug ID: 58422 Summary: vector shift operations work in C but not C++ Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c+

[Bug c++/58422] vector shift operations work in C but not C++

2013-09-14 Thread gabriel at teuton dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58422 --- Comment #1 from Gabriel M. Beddingfield --- Created attachment 30823 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30823&action=edit example program demonstrating the problem.

[Bug tree-optimization/46507] std::tuple missed optimization

2013-09-14 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46507 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization CC|

[Bug c++/58422] vector shift operations work in C but not C++

2013-09-14 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58422 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/54427] Expose more vector extensions

2013-09-14 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54427 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gabriel at teuton dot org --- Comment #14 f

[Bug c++/58422] vector shift operations work in C but not C++

2013-09-14 Thread gabriel at teuton dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58422 --- Comment #3 from Gabriel M. Beddingfield --- Thanks!

[Bug c++/36566] Cannot bind packed field

2013-09-14 Thread gabriel at teuton dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36566 --- Comment #6 from Gabriel M. Beddingfield --- All assignments of obj.s to type short& and short* are incorrect, and ideally they would all result in compiler errors. The C++ spec (C++03, Sects. 3.9, 3.9.1, 3.9.2) are very clear that T and "poin