http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58420
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58420
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Though, could you provide some preprocessed testcase? At any rate, I think
it's because ubsan_type_descriptor doesn't handle IDENTIFIER_NODEs very well,
this should be fixed as a side effect of
http://gcc.gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58413
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58420
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58411
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57370
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56873
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |middle-end
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58421
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58421
Bug ID: 58421
Summary: [4.9 regression] FAIL:
gcc.c-torture/compile/20051216-1.c -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer (internal compiler error)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55926
--- Comment #2 from pch at laposte dot net ---
I can neither reproduce the anomaly with 4.8.1.
Anyway I did not raise the issue because it was blocking for me. I had just
hope it could help to locate and fix an anomaly in gcc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269
--- Comment #22 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sat Sep 14 11:09:55 2013
New Revision: 202590
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202590&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc:
PR target/58269
config/i386/i386.c (ix86_function_arg_regno_p):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107
--- Comment #25 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to David Fang from comment #22)
> Do one of these apple libunwind sources (0.30, 0.35.1) correspond to what's
> bundled in libgcc_s in darwin8,9,10?
>
> http://opensource.apple.com/tarballs/libunwind
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41991
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107
--- Comment #26 from Iain Sandoe ---
*** Bug 41991 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44488
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48094
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|lto |target
--- Comment #18 from Iain Sandoe --
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48094
--- Comment #19 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sat Sep 14 15:36:41 2013
New Revision: 202593
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202593&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc:
PR target/48094
* config/darwin.c (darwin_objc2_section
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48094
--- Comment #20 from Iain Sandoe ---
fixed on trunk, but should be back-ported to 4.8/4.7.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48097
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58256
--- Comment #7 from Chen Gang ---
Created attachment 30821
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30821&action=edit
some simple modification based on the reduced .c file.
After learning from what you have done, and give a little addi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58382
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Sep 14 16:58:01 2013
New Revision: 202594
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202594&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/58382
* config/pa/pa.c (pa_expand_prologue): Change
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58382
--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Sep 14 17:00:32 2013
New Revision: 202595
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202595&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/58382
* config/pa/pa.c (pa_expand_prologue): Change
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58382
--- Comment #6 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Sep 14 17:03:32 2013
New Revision: 202596
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202596&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/58382
* config/pa/pa.c (pa_expand_prologue): Change
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58382
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58405
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58405
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58079
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58422
Bug ID: 58422
Summary: vector shift operations work in C but not C++
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58422
--- Comment #1 from Gabriel M. Beddingfield ---
Created attachment 30823
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30823&action=edit
example program demonstrating the problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46507
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58422
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54427
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gabriel at teuton dot org
--- Comment #14 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58422
--- Comment #3 from Gabriel M. Beddingfield ---
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36566
--- Comment #6 from Gabriel M. Beddingfield ---
All assignments of obj.s to type short& and short* are incorrect, and ideally
they would all result in compiler errors.
The C++ spec (C++03, Sects. 3.9, 3.9.1, 3.9.2) are very clear that T and
"poin
34 matches
Mail list logo