[Bug c++/58366] invocation of thread_local class containing bound function leads to : "Illegal instruction: 4"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58366 Jonathan Coe changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #30768|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/44107] gcc emits frame (epilogue) info incompatible with the darwin {8,9}-unwinder,10-compacter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug c++/58375] internal compiler error: in push_reload, at reload.c:1360

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58375 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini --- Doesn't look like a C++ front-end issue

[Bug c++/58366] invocation of thread_local class containing bound function leads to : "Illegal instruction: 4"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58366 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #3) > Thus this OSX, right? Because on x86_64-linux the problem cannot be > reproduced. I think Jon triaged an issue about OSX a few weeks ago. Hmm, maybe, I don't r

[Bug c++/58375] New: internal compiler error: in push_reload, at reload.c:1360

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58375 Bug ID: 58375 Summary: internal compiler error: in push_reload, at reload.c:1360 Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Prio

[Bug c++/58366] invocation of thread_local class containing bound function leads to : "Illegal instruction: 4"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58366 --- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini --- For the record, I think I had in mind target/58104.

[Bug target/58330] powerpc64 atomic store split in two

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58330 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Mon Sep 9 23:48:10 2013 New Revision: 202418 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202418&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/58330 gcc/ * config/rs6000/rs6000.md (bswapdi2_64bit): Disab

[Bug rtl-optimization/58365] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] likely wrong code bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58365 --- Comment #3 from Maxim Kuvyrkov --- Bug introduced in revision 162592. Investigating. commit 48d5e32fb40bb7973e596b36d12ad4041d8ef10a Author: mkuvyrkov Date: Tue Jul 27 19:38:10 2010 + PR target/42495 PR middle-end/425

[Bug tree-optimization/58343] [4.9 Regression] ICE in dfs_enumerate_from, at cfganal.c:1036

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58343 --- Comment #3 from Zhendong Su --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #2) ... > I've got a fix for this in testing. Jeff, thanks very much for your explanation and quick fix.

[Bug rtl-optimization/58365] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] likely wrong code bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58365 Maxim Kuvyrkov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 fr

[Bug fortran/57697] [OOP] Segfault with defined assignment for components during intrinsic assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57697 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus --- Submitted patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-09/msg00016.html As follow up, one should check whether arrays (lhs unallocated, same shape, different shape) are correctly handled.

[Bug rtl-optimization/58365] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] likely wrong code bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58365 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- That is actually the crossjumping pass after csa (jump2; though yes, previously it has been part of csa). In any case, I don't see anything wrong with the cross jumping, it turns the two: (set (me

<    1   2