http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58284
--- Comment #1 from Winston Smith ---
The same happens if the build dir is not a symlink.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58278
--- Comment #4 from Martin Husemann ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #3)
> So what? What happens if conftest.cc doesn't fiddle with visibility at all?
Sorry, I am not quite sure I understand what you are up to.
Same thing happens, s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58278
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58265
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58265
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|SUSPENDED
Summary|std::string
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58278
--- Comment #6 from Martin Husemann ---
Ooops, my lack of x86 ABI knowledge strikes again.
Indeed, visibility is properly expressed in the prologue, all is fine.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58287
Bug ID: 58287
Summary: internal compiler error: in
c_builtin_function_ext_scope
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58272
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58287
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson ---
This is a duplicate of PR57848.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58287
Jacek Caban changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57848
Jacek Caban changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jacek at codeweavers dot com
--- Comment #8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14932
--- Comment #15 from zhangjingwang at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to zhangjingwang from comment #14)
> #include
> #include
>
> struct TestStruct {
> int array[13];
> };
>
> struct TempStruct {
> int index;
> };
>
> int array_offset(struct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #23 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Martin, one of the errors with strict volatile bitfields
was with a structure like this.
struct S0 {
signed a : 7;
unsigned b : 28;
} __attribute__((packed));
here the member b is using SImode but th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35339
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269
--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe ---
note this *breaks bootstrap* for the normal language set.
reduced testcase:
int foo (int a, ...)
{
void *args;
args = __builtin_apply_args ();
return 0;
}
/src/test/pr58269.c:7:1: internal compiler erro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
bt
#0 0x000100d7805a in internal_error (gmsgid=0x404 ) at /src/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/diagnostic.c:1120
#1 0x000100d78266 in fancy_abort (file=Could not find the frame base for
"_Z11fancy_abortPKciS0_".
)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58239
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58288
Bug ID: 58288
Summary: Incorrect error message on malformed section attribute
syntax.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58288
--- Comment #1 from Ralph Loader ---
Whoops I meant "not specified *correctly*" rather than just "not specified".
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58288
--- Comment #2 from Ralph Loader ---
Created attachment 30735
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30735&action=edit
Patch
Patch to change the error message attached. I also noticed another problem: we
were setting the global vari
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58289
Bug ID: 58289
Summary: gcc/gengtype.c includes gcc/double-int.h, which uses
C++ constructs
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
21 matches
Mail list logo
