http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58147
Bug ID: 58147
Summary: Template template parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58121
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58147
David Krauss changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52544
--- Comment #6 from Rodrigo Campos ---
Actually, I recently find out that the memory corruption thing was not a GCC
bug. It was a really weird error that only appears in the library if you do a
print to stdout (not stderr) before some thing happen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58144
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Amit Chitnis from comment #0)
> 2. create a big file (say 900M) named "new" in a location which is a part of
> your include path.
This is your problem, is a standard header so you must not rep
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58007
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #30567|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44978
--- Comment #17 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
In what follows "Janus' patch" will refer to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30629
and "Mikael's patch" to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30633
Although there are still du
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44978
--- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Created attachment 30642
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30642&action=edit
Differences between the errors printed with patches 30629 and 30633
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57459
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 30643
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30643&action=edit
rh995446.i
We've got this reported in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995446
too.
I've created a self
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58148
Bug ID: 58148
Summary: [C++11] Fails to insert iterator range into sequence
container with -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG when conversion is
needed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Тел.8(3462)99-72-32;
8(3462)61-56-10;
почта nagor...@mail.ru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58148
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini ---
Francois, can you please have a look?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44978
--- Comment #19 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Created attachment 30645
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30645&action=edit
Test showing a spectacular improvement with both patches
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58137
--- Comment #4 from Yukhin Kirill ---
> Could some one check if the generated code is now correct ?
Patch works both on attached AVX2 testcase and on root AVX-512 issue, thanks.
I think it should be submitted to gcc-patches.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58067
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58007
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55754
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57662
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57980
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Aug 13 13:34:08 2013
New Revision: 201687
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=201687&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-08-13 Marek Polacek
Jakub Jelinek
PR tree-optimiza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57980
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Aug 13 13:42:28 2013
New Revision: 201688
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=201688&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-08-13 Marek Polacek
Jakub Jelinek
PR tree-optimiza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57980
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58146
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44978
--- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I have run my tests with the patch in comment #17. As expected it fixes
pr58023#c1, but it also remove the duplicate error in pr43591.f90 and
pr43591.f90:15.55:
integer, dimension(physical%numbe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58100
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57924
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57620
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bcmpinc at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52852
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57824
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bcmpinc at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52852
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 57824 ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51253
Broes De Cat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||broes.decat at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58083
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58010
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56417
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57661
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58146
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58149
Bug ID: 58149
Summary: GCC4.8.1 fails on OS X 10.8.4, 'pointer_t' error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58146
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Actually, the patch doesn't work (yet).
Working on it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58150
Bug ID: 58150
Summary: debug info about definition of enum class not emitted
if the declaration was already used in a template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58105
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Patch was posted here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg00770.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50584
Malcolm Inglis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||me at minglis dot id.au
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57662
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
Created attachment 30650
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30650&action=edit
proposed patch
When moving up an instruction, we can make empty basic blocks or create other
possibilities f
42 matches
Mail list logo
