[Bug c/57923] New: ICE in handle_braces (gcc.c) at -O3 (both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

. $ gcc-trunk -v gcc version 4.9.0 20130718 (experimental) [trunk revision 201019] (GCC) $ gcc-trunk -O2 -c small.c $ gcc-4.8 -O3 -c small.c $ gcc-trunk -O3 small.c gcc-trunk: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1) 0x40c95d execute ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/gcc.c:2824 0x40ccb4

[Bug fortran/57924] New: -Werror -Warray-temporaries -Wno-error=array-temporaries fails on array temporary warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57924 Bug ID: 57924 Summary: -Werror -Warray-temporaries -Wno-error=array-temporaries fails on array temporary warnings Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: U

[Bug fortran/57924] -Werror -Warray-temporaries -Wno-error=array-temporaries fails on array temporary warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57924 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Jahns --- Created attachment 30522 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30522&action=edit Makefile giving flags Add Makefile missing from original report.

[Bug middle-end/56888] memcpy implementation optimized as a call to memcpy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888 --- Comment #18 from Paulo J. Matos --- I notice(In reply to Brooks Moses from comment #12) > > Now, if this replacement still happens when you compile with -nostdlib, that > would be a bug since it becomes legal code in that case. But that's >

[Bug c++/57925] New: discrete_distribution can be improved to O(1) per sampling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57925 Bug ID: 57925 Summary: discrete_distribution can be improved to O(1) per sampling Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug libstdc++/57885] unordered_map find slower in 4.8.1 than 4.7.3 with integer key

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57885 --- Comment #5 from François Dumont --- The biggest performance regression introduced in version 4.8 is coming from an attempt to enhance unordered containers global performances. The data model has been modified because the erase operation had be

[Bug fortran/57924] -Werror -Warray-temporaries -Wno-error=array-temporaries fails on array temporary warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57924 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Jahns --- Just tried with gfortran 4.8.1 (an Ubuntu 13.04 test release). The problem persists.

[Bug driver/51844] configuring with --with-gxx-include-dir= adds a relative (non-existing) C++ include dir

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51844 Sylpheed changed: What|Removed |Added CC||typesylph at gmail dot com --- Comment #5 from

[Bug c++/57926] New: Atomic functions broken with C++ but not C?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57926 Bug ID: 57926 Summary: Atomic functions broken with C++ but not C? Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/57926] Atomic functions broken with C++ but not C?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57926 --- Comment #1 from lailavrazda1979 at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 30523 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30523&action=edit Code triggering the bug

[Bug c++/57926] Atomic functions broken with C++ but not C?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57926 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONF

[Bug middle-end/57805] Wasted work in write_roots()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57805 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/51244] [SH] Inefficient conditional branch and code around T bit

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244 Laurent Aflonsi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||laurent.alfonsi at st dot com --- Comme

[Bug rtl-optimization/57810] Wasted work in validate_const_int()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57810 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/51244] [SH] Inefficient conditional branch and code around T bit

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244 --- Comment #59 from Laurent Aflonsi --- I have a functional regression due to this improvement when we are compiling the enclosed example in -O2. $ sh-superh-elf-gcc -O2 pr51244-20-main.c pr51244-20.c $ sh-superh-elf-run a.out FAIL Thus, the

[Bug tree-optimization/57698] rev.200179 causes many errors (inlining failures) when building Firefox

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57698 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/57927] New: -march=core-avx2 different than -march=native on INTEL Haswell (i7-4700K)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57927 Bug ID: 57927 Summary: -march=core-avx2 different than -march=native on INTEL Haswell (i7-4700K) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug target/57927] -march=core-avx2 different than -march=native on INTEL Haswell (i7-4700K)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57927 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug c/57928] New: Doesn't compile with ISL 0.12

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57928 Bug ID: 57928 Summary: Doesn't compile with ISL 0.12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assign

[Bug java/57929] New: gcc-4.8: FTBFS on m68k: ICE compiling libjava/interpret.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57929 Bug ID: 57929 Summary: gcc-4.8: FTBFS on m68k: ICE compiling libjava/interpret.cc Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug target/57927] -march=core-avx2 different than -march=native on INTEL Haswell (i7-4700K)

-hle -mrdrnd -mf16c -mfsgsbase -mno-rdseed -mno-prfchw -mno-adx -mfxsr -mxsave -mxsaveopt --param l1-cache-size=32 --param l1-cache-line-size=64 --param l2-cache-size=8192 -mtune=generic -quiet -dumpbase LU.c -auxbase-strip LU.native -O3 -version -o LU.native GNU C++ (GCC) version 4.9.0 20130718 (ex

[Bug target/57927] -march=core-avx2 different than -march=native on INTEL Haswell (i7-4700K)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57927 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- gcc/config/i386/driver-i386.c host processor detection apparently hasn't been updated for those recent processors yet. You could look for this code: case 0x2d: /* Sandy Bridge. */ c

[Bug c++/57930] New: missing destructor call after thrown exception in C++11 list initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57930 Bug ID: 57930 Summary: missing destructor call after thrown exception in C++11 list initialization Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug tree-optimization/57698] rev.200179 causes many errors (inlining failures) when building Firefox

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57698 --- Comment #10 from Sriraman Tallam --- Patch committed. This should fix this. Sri

[Bug c/57931] New: There are superfluous movw instructions in when using GCC-AVR (WinAVR) asm code.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57931 Bug ID: 57931 Summary: There are superfluous movw instructions in when using GCC-AVR (WinAVR) asm code. Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/57930] missing destructor call after thrown exception in C++11 list initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57930 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- I'm pretty sure there's an existing bug report about this, opened by Jason.

[Bug tree-optimization/57698] rev.200179 causes many errors (inlining failures) when building Firefox

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57698 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/57933] New: function dwf_regno accesses dbx_register_map beyond its upper limit

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57933 Bug ID: 57933 Summary: function dwf_regno accesses dbx_register_map beyond its upper limit Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/57932] New: Aligned stack wastes more than k bytes, if preferred stack boundary k=2**n, n>=4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57932 Bug ID: 57932 Summary: Aligned stack wastes more than k bytes, if preferred stack boundary k=2**n, n>=4 Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: