[Bug target/57767] New: rx-unknown-elf ice of invalid %-code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57767 Bug ID: 57767 Summary: rx-unknown-elf ice of invalid %-code Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/57767] rx-unknown-elf ice of invalid %-code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57767 --- Comment #1 from Yoshinori Sato --- Created attachment 30415 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30415&action=edit failed sample

[Bug fortran/54788] ICE on pointer-array element assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54788 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus --- Author: burnus Date: Mon Jul 1 07:53:55 2013 New Revision: 200575 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=200575&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-07-01 Dominique d'Humieres PR fortran/54788 * arra

[Bug preprocessor/57768] New: Assumption of a case-insensitive filesystem on Darwin is incorrect

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57768 Bug ID: 57768 Summary: Assumption of a case-insensitive filesystem on Darwin is incorrect Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/54788] ICE on pointer-array element assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54788 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/57769] New: Unable to call a constructor invoking another constructor in the same class (sister constructor) with designated initializer for aggregate types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57769 Bug ID: 57769 Summary: Unable to call a constructor invoking another constructor in the same class (sister constructor) with designated initializer for aggregate types Produc

[Bug c++/57769] Unable to call a constructor invoking another constructor in the same class (sister constructor) with designated initializer for aggregate types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57769 Henri changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|blocker |normal

[Bug c++/57769] Unable to call a constructor invoking another constructor in the same class (sister constructor) with designated initializer for aggregate types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57769 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/39269] Invalid template friend declaration accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39269 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/43694] G++ accepts a template friend with the wrong template parameters

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43694 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bangerth at gmail dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/52900] Compile source using Boost header with -static -flto -std=c++11 breaks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52900 --- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini --- Note, per the bug submitting instructions, no URLs, please. If you are still having problems in this area please add here a minimized (there are many tools available for that, see our wiki) self-contained test

[Bug c++/53439] g++ generates buggy code with optimisation flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53439 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/56617] c++ compiler error when trying to build SuperCollider with nova-simd extension on arm ubuntu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56617 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/57765] [C++11] Variadic Template Specialization does not follow the INCITS/ISO​/IEC 14882-2011 standard

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57765 trashyankes at wp dot pl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trashyankes at wp dot pl --- Co

[Bug fortran/54788] ICE on pointer-array element assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54788 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Thanks for the commit.

[Bug c++/57769] Unable to call a constructor invoking another constructor in the same class (sister constructor) with designated initializer for aggregate types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57769 --- Comment #2 from Henri --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #1) > Please add here a minimized self-contained reproducer. Also, you are not > saying which version of GCC you are using. My GCC version is currently 4.7. I use Code::Blocks

[Bug tree-optimization/57400] [4.9 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (definition in block n follows the use)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57400 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2013-07-01 CC|

[Bug web/50642] onlinedocs formated text too small to read

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642 --- Comment #11 from Jon Grant --- Hi The problem is still visible for me with default new Firefox profile: Screenshot: http://justpaste.it/2zap Who can re-generate the website? Regards

[Bug web/50642] onlinedocs formated text too small to read

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642 --- Comment #12 from Shakthi Kannan --- Hi, - Original Message - | From: "jg at jguk dot org" | | The problem is still visible for me with default new Firefox profile: \-- The patch has not yet been committed to the trunk. SK

[Bug c++/57769] Unable to call a constructor invoking another constructor in the same class (sister constructor) with designated initializer for aggregate types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57769 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini --- Both examples are rejected with no ICE by current mainline and 4_8-branch. The same happens with current ICC and rather recent clang.

[Bug c++/57769] Unable to call a constructor invoking another constructor in the same class (sister constructor) with designated initializer for aggregate types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57769 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1

[Bug c++/57769] Unable to call a constructor invoking another constructor in the same class (sister constructor) with designated initializer for aggregate types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57769 --- Comment #4 from Henri --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #3) > Both examples are rejected with no ICE by current mainline and 4_8-branch. > The same happens with current ICC and rather recent clang. So, this is not a bug, right?

[Bug target/57735] ICE with -mtune=xscale (error: could not split insn) when building webkit

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57735 --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #4) > The ICE on the reduced test case started with r186147 and stopped with > r199188. > They both touch the same code so I believe r199188 is a proper

[Bug c++/57765] [C++11] Variadic Template Specialization does not follow the INCITS/ISO​/IEC 14882-2011 standard

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57765 --- Comment #2 from AaronNGray --- Interesting ...from the standard, not in braces :- "A template parameter pack of a function template shall not be followed by another template parameter unless that template parameter can be deduced or has a defa

[Bug rtl-optimization/56129] Seg fault on 256.bzip2 from spec2000 with -lto and pre-reload scheduler for x86 Atom

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56129 Yuri Rumyantsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/57749] -ffpe-trap=zero or invalid produces SIGFPE on complex zero ** 1e0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57749 --- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres --- We all whould have read the manual first: >From 'man cpow' ... DESCRIPTION cpow(x, y) returns the complex number x raised to the complex power y. cpow(x,y) is equivalent to cexp(y * clog(x

[Bug fortran/57749] -ffpe-trap=zero or invalid produces SIGFPE on complex zero ** 1e0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57749 --- Comment #14 from Andreas Schwab --- C11 G.6.4.1 The cpow functions The cpow functions raise floating-point exceptions if appropriate for the calculation of the parts of the result, and may also raise spurious floating-point exceptions.379) 3

[Bug debug/57737] -fopenmp + -femit-struct-debug-reduced/baseonly = internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57737 Evgeny Gavrin changed: What|Removed |Added Component|libgomp |debug --- Comment #3 from Evgeny Gavrin

[Bug target/57753] FSF gcc bootstrap needs to use xcrun to bootstrap post-darwin12

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57753 --- Comment #3 from Mike Stump --- These should go in config/*darwin* I think.

[Bug target/57735] ICE with -mtune=xscale (error: could not split insn) when building webkit

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57735 --- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #4) > The ICE on the reduced test case started with r186147 and stopped with > r199188. > They both touch the same code so I believe r199188 is a proper

[Bug target/57735] ICE with -mtune=xscale (error: could not split insn) when building webkit

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57735 --- Comment #7 from Mikael Pettersson --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #6) > After looking at it more closely: Mikael, are you sure the revisions are > right? It seems to me that r199813 is just the backport of r199188. > > Can you please d

[Bug c++/57764] class static constexpr variables cannot be references

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57764 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug c++/57770] New: non-static data member initializer in nested class and default value in constructor cause compiler segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57770 Bug ID: 57770 Summary: non-static data member initializer in nested class and default value in constructor cause compiler segmentation fault Product: gcc Version:

[Bug fortran/57749] -ffpe-trap=zero or invalid produces SIGFPE on complex zero ** 1e0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57749 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/57770] non-static data member initializer in nested class and default value in constructor cause compiler segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57770 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/57764] class static constexpr variables cannot be references

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57764 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/57771] New: g++ misinterprets >> in static_cast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57771 Bug ID: 57771 Summary: g++ misinterprets >> in static_cast Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug fortran/43310] -pedantic errors involving PARAMETERs and out of range result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43310 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/57771] g++ misinterprets >> in static_cast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57771 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/57771] g++ misinterprets >> in static_cast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57771 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug c++/57765] [C++11] Variadic Template Specialization does not follow the INCITS/ISO​/IEC 14882-2011 standard

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57765 --- Comment #3 from trashyankes at wp dot pl --- I see, they fix wording in final version, but meaning didnt change (at last if I understand it correctly). "(...) primary class template or alias template is a template parameter pack, it shall be t

[Bug tree-optimization/57701] Incorrect optimisation of inlined function with inline assembly when cross-compiling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57701 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug ada/57772] New: Bug box in gnat_to_gnu, at ada/gcc-interface/trans.c:5778 on legal Ada 2005 quantifier expression with exponentiation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57772 Bug ID: 57772 Summary: Bug box in gnat_to_gnu, at ada/gcc-interface/trans.c:5778 on legal Ada 2005 quantifier expression with exponentiation Product: gcc Version:

[Bug c++/57746] rejected valid specialization of member function of class template (I think)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57746 --- Comment #4 from Andy Lutomirski --- Daniel, I'm unconvinced that your interpretation is the intended one. [temp.explicit].4 says "A declaration of [list including member function] ... A definition of [list not including member function]". If

[Bug middle-end/57393] [4.9 Regression] error: definition in block 4 follows the use / internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393 --- Comment #7 from Dmitry Gorbachev --- For convenience, I put here a testcase from bug 57400. Joost VandeVondele: "this second testcase is almost certainly a dup of PR57393. It passes with -fno-tree-reassoc. The testcase is conveniently smaller.

[Bug target/55033] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] PowerPC section type conflict error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55033 --- Comment #11 from Chung-Ju Wu --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #10) > The testcase needs to add -meabi to fix #8. > > Wrt #9: it seems you only tested 64-bit mode, -meabi is supported > only in 32-bit mode. Sebastian provided

[Bug c/57773] New: -Wpedantic incorrect warning for enum bit-field

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57773 Bug ID: 57773 Summary: -Wpedantic incorrect warning for enum bit-field Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug sanitizer/57774] New: __libc_stack_end usage is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57774 Bug ID: 57774 Summary: __libc_stack_end usage is broken Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer

[Bug sanitizer/57774] __libc_stack_end usage is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57774 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Change what? __libc_stack_end? That would be a user error.