http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
--- Comment #18 from Eric Botcazou ---
> FWIW, I've bootstrapped and regtested gcc 4.9 with r192676 reapplied and the
> dse.c and cselib.c hunks of r193802 reverted on several hosts (x86_64,
> sparc64, powerpc64, armv5tel, m68k) without regression
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57334
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE: in input_gimple_stmt, |[4.9 regression] ICE: in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57565
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57553
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Jun 8 12:21:58 2013
New Revision: 199850
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199850&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-06-08 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/57553
* simplify.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57553
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
The rejects-valid and the ICE-on-valid-code issue has been solved.
TODO: The following message for invalid code should be improved. [The problem
is that storage_size cannot handle "a", which is required for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
--- Comment #25 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Jun 8 12:26:40 2013
New Revision: 199851
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199851&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-06-08 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/37336
* trans-decl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55383
--- Comment #2 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
Hi Manuel, I also got pinged by a FreeBSD user of one of my ports
about this.
Somehow I cannot find your patch submission on gcc-patches -- is it
possible you haven't submitted it there yet? Will you be doi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57172
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57543
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57524
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2013-06-05 00:00:00
-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: j...@bass-software.com
Using 4.9.0 20130608 (experimental) [trunk revision 199851], target
arm-unknown-eabi.
The following case produces suboptimal code:
unsigned
test (unsigned t)
{
if (t != (unsigned)-1)
t |= 3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57555
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
The warning is correct, but it is arguably unhelpful in this case, which is
made worse by the fact that -Woverflow is enabled by default. We do not warn
for
uint8_t ret = 0;
ret += ~foo;
with -Wall -Wextra,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57468
--- Comment #3 from Igor Zamyatin ---
Patch is here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-06/msg00357.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55383
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Gerald Pfeifer from comment #2)
> Somehow I cannot find your patch submission on gcc-patches -- is it
> possible you haven't submitted it there yet? Will you be doing that,
> or is it fine
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57468
--- Comment #4 from Igor Zamyatin ---
So following commit fixed the issue
commit 3620f4de1b49b0bfffe5f812b2d259e5c72c5c61
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Jun 6 21:12:06 2013 +
2013-06-06 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/574
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57563
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
-trunk -v
gcc version 4.9.0 20130608 (experimental) [trunk revision 199849] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk -O1 -m32 reduced.c
$ ./a.out
$ gcc-4.7 -Os -m32 reduced.c
$ ./a.out
$ gcc-trunk -Os -m32 reduced.c
$ ./a.out
1
$
---
int printf (const char *, ...);
int a[6][9] = {};
int b = 1;
int *c
.
$ gcc-trunk -v
gcc version 4.9.0 20130608 (experimental) [trunk revision 199849] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk -O2 -m32 reduced.c
$ ./a.out
0
$ gcc-4.7 -O3 -m32 reduced.c
$ ./a.out
0
$ gcc-trunk -O3 -m32 reduced.c
$ ./a.out
134519796
int printf (const char *, ...);
struct S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57509
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48784
--- Comment #2 from Sandra Loosemore ---
I'm working on a fix for this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23623
Sandra Loosemore changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at codesourcery dot com
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56997
Sandra Loosemore changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at codesourcery dot com
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57568
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57568
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 30280
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30280&action=edit
gcc49-pr57568.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57509
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
Thanks Marc. Please take your own plan very seriously! ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57509
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
Created attachment 30281
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30281&action=edit
Untested patch
There are quite a few issues with the c++ version...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50554
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57570
Bug ID: 57570
Summary: Deduction succeeds despite type mismatch of non-type
template parameter and deduced argument
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57571
Bug ID: 57571
Summary: linux kernel function memcpy() execute with low
efficiency on Intel Ivybridge platform
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
30 matches
Mail list logo
