[Bug c++/57552] New: Internal compiler error with vector::emplace_back() for templated class constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57552 Bug ID: 57552 Summary: Internal compiler error with vector::emplace_back() for templated class constructor Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug c++/57552] Internal compiler error with vector::emplace_back() for templated class constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57552 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Judin --- Created attachment 30272 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30272&action=edit GCC 4.7-20130601 snapshot output

[Bug c++/57552] Internal compiler error with vector::emplace_back() for templated class constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57552 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Judin --- Created attachment 30273 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30273&action=edit GCC 4.7-20130601 snapshot intermediate precompiled file.

[Bug target/57540] stack pointer related loop invariants after reload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57540 bin.cheng changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|target --- Comment #2 from bin.cheng --- Thi

[Bug fortran/57553] New: Valid use of STORAGE_SIZE rejected, bad error message for invalid use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57553 Bug ID: 57553 Summary: Valid use of STORAGE_SIZE rejected, bad error message for invalid use Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic

[Bug fortran/57553] Valid use of STORAGE_SIZE rejected, bad error message for invalid use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57553 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus --- "13.7.160 STORAGE SIZE (A [, KIND]) Description. Storage size in bits. Class. Inquiry function. Arguments. A shall be a scalar or array of any type. If it is polymorphic it shall not be an undef

[Bug rtl-optimization/57459] [4.8 Regression] LRA inheritance bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57459 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/57550] [4.8/4.9 Regression] bogus "error ... is private"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57550 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/57549] Bogus error with array constructor with derived-type typespec

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57549 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid, diagnostic --- Comment #

[Bug c++/53658] internal compiler error -- segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53658 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/57552] Internal compiler error with vector::emplace_back() for templated class constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57552 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/57086] Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57086 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jussi.judin at ericsson dot com --- Comme

[Bug preprocessor/38990] preprocessing different in g++ -E and regular compiling.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38990 Jan Smets changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.co

[Bug lto/57554] New: [4.9 regression] 176.gcc built with -flto miscompared after r198917 for x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57554 Bug ID: 57554 Summary: [4.9 regression] 176.gcc built with -flto miscompared after r198917 for x86 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug c++/54366] [meta-bug] decltype issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54366 Bug 54366 depends on bug 53311, which changed state. Bug 53311 Summary: [C++0x] argument packs are not handled correctly in decltype http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53311 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/53311] [C++0x] argument packs are not handled correctly in decltype

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53311 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug preprocessor/38990] preprocessing different in g++ -E and regular compiling.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38990 --- Comment #4 from Jan Smets --- Known to work: GCC 4.6

[Bug c++/54047] unused variable warning not for std::string

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54047 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/57554] [4.9 regression] 176.gcc built with -flto miscompared after r198917 for x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57554 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug regression/57551] [4.9 Regression]: g++.dg/ext/visibility/anon6.C scan-assembler 1BIiE1cE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57551 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/57479] [ARM][NEON] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault in add_dependence_list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57479 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/13088] templatizing outer class hides specialization of inner template class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13088 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/57555] New: Warning on negation of constexpr uint8_t being assigned to uint8_t

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57555 Bug ID: 57555 Summary: Warning on negation of constexpr uint8_t being assigned to uint8_t Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/57555] Warning on negation of constexpr uint8_t being assigned to uint8_t

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57555 --- Comment #1 from Ari Sundholm --- It seems that actually just making the variable const suffices: uint8_t foo() { static const uint8_t foo = 0xff; uint8_t ret = ~foo; return ret; }

[Bug fortran/57556] New: [OOP][Regression] ICE with move_alloc on polymorphic component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57556 Bug ID: 57556 Summary: [OOP][Regression] ICE with move_alloc on polymorphic component Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/57555] Warning on negation of constexpr uint8_t being assigned to uint8_t

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57555 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini --- Not having studied the issue in any detail, most likely the warning is fine: all the modern compilers (gcc, ICC, clang) I have at hand warn in exactly the same way.

[Bug fortran/57556] [4.9 Regression] [OOP] ICE with move_alloc on polymorphic component with -fcheck=all

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57556 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code S

[Bug c++/57555] Warning on negation of constexpr uint8_t being assigned to uint8_t

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57555 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug c++/55520] [C++11] ICE when capturing a variable-length stack array in lambda; in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9122

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55520 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug regression/57551] [4.9 Regression]: g++.dg/ext/visibility/anon6.C scan-assembler 1BIiE1cE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57551 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at redhat dot com --- Comment #2 from

[Bug fortran/57556] [4.9 Regression] [OOP] ICE with move_alloc on polymorphic component with -fcheck=all

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57556 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/57556] [4.9 Regression] [OOP] ICE with move_alloc on polymorphic component with -fcheck=all

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57556 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Jun 7 13:20:29 2013 New Revision: 199812 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199812&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-06-07 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/57556 * trans.c (gf

[Bug fortran/57556] [4.9 Regression] [OOP] ICE with move_alloc on polymorphic component with -fcheck=all

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57556 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/55149] capturing VLA in lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55149 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to David Abdurachmanov from comment #9) I addressed example 1 in 55520. Please provide a self-contained testcase for example 2.

[Bug regression/57551] [4.9 Regression]: g++.dg/ext/visibility/anon6.C scan-assembler 1BIiE1cE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57551 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Assign

[Bug target/56564] movdqa on possibly-8-byte-aligned struct with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56564 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 30275 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30275&action=edit gcc49-pr56564.patch Untested fix. Honza, is the array type >= 16 bytes alignment increase the only ABI mandated

[Bug c++/57557] New: can't reference static const int member with optimizations on

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57557 Bug ID: 57557 Summary: can't reference static const int member with optimizations on Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug tree-optimization/57558] New: Issue with number of iterations calculation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57558 Bug ID: 57558 Summary: Issue with number of iterations calculation Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-o

[Bug regression/57551] [4.9 Regression]: g++.dg/ext/visibility/anon6.C scan-assembler 1BIiE1cE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57551 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka --- OK, C++ FE properly brings the decl local as part of constrain_visibility, however later in pt.c it is made public again in mark_decl_instantiated as explicit instantiation. My wild try is the following: Index

[Bug c++/57557] can't reference static const int member with optimizations on

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57557 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/57557] can't reference static const int member with optimizations on

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57557 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > It's undefined behaviour, you take a reference ton object that has no s/ton object/to an object/

[Bug c++/57557] can't reference static const int member with optimizations on

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57557 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Doh, sorry, I completely misread the test! It's still undefined behaviour though, obj is uninitialized and you're missing a return from A::foo

[Bug fortran/57549] Bogus error with array constructor with derived-type typespec

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57549 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Jun 7 15:05:47 2013 New Revision: 199820 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199820&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-06-07 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/57549 * array.c (gf

[Bug fortran/57549] Bogus error with array constructor with derived-type typespec

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57549 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/57559] New: S/390: ICE with lra

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57559 Bug ID: 57559 Summary: S/390: ICE with lra Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Ass

[Bug c++/57560] New: Variadic templates, unwarranted warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57560 Bug ID: 57560 Summary: Variadic templates, unwarranted warnings Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/57560] Variadic templates, unwarranted warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57560 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- is this PR 56958 ?

[Bug c++/57557] can't reference static const int member with optimizations on

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57557 Pavel Chupin changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Pavel Chupin --

[Bug c++/57560] Variadic templates, unwarranted warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57560 --- Comment #2 from vpozdyayev at gmail dot com --- Almost. This time it's "parameter" instead of "variable".

[Bug c++/57557] can't reference static const int member with optimizations on

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57557 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wa

[Bug c++/55149] capturing VLA in lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55149 --- Comment #11 from David Abdurachmanov --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #10) Hi Jason, Compiled fine in 4.8.0, fails in 4.9.0 (r199649). That's the smallest I could get in this time. It produces two errors for the same line. david

[Bug tree-optimization/57539] [4.9 Regression] ice in ipa_edge_duplication_hook

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57539 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/57560] Variadic templates, unwarranted warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57560 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 f

[Bug c++/57561] New: gnu function multiversion - resolver doesn't use isa priority according to documentation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57561 Bug ID: 57561 Summary: gnu function multiversion - resolver doesn't use isa priority according to documentation Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/57548] calling gnu multiversioned function at file scope causes ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57548 --- Comment #1 from Sriraman Tallam --- Patch proposed to fix this problem: The problem here is that the caller to fum not from a function and current_function_decl is NULL when processing the call. The simple fix in call.c to check current_fun

[Bug fortran/57562] New: Internal compiler error due to extended derived type with PARAMETER attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57562 Bug ID: 57562 Summary: Internal compiler error due to extended derived type with PARAMETER attribute Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: cr

[Bug fortran/57562] Internal compiler error due to extended derived type with PARAMETER attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57562 helvio changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|major

[Bug c/57563] New: Lots of Cilk+ failures on i686-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57563 Bug ID: 57563 Summary: Lots of Cilk+ failures on i686-linux Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c A

[Bug fortran/57562] Internal compiler error due to extended derived type with PARAMETER attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57562 helvio changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.7.3 |4.8.1 --- Comment #1 from helvio --- I just ins

[Bug c++/54440] [c++11] g++ prematurely applying rule that a template parameter pack cannot be followed by a template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54440 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini --- Hi Jason. Noticed your patch here scheduled for 4.9...

[Bug c++/57086] Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57086 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||avraammauridis at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug c++/57387] Passing parameter pack to emplace stl function cause compilation bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57387 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/56544] documentation for __cplusplus is out of date

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56544 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug fortran/57535] [OOP] ICE when allocating a CLASS function-result variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57535 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus --- Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-06/msg00053.html

[Bug fortran/57562] [OOP] Internal compiler error due to extended derived type with PARAMETER attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57562 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org Summ

[Bug bootstrap/56714] [4.9 regression] Bootstrap failure libitm/local_atomic:1580:3: error: always_inline function might not be inlinable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56714 Gerald Pfeifer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/57564] New: regmove switched operands?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57564 Bug ID: 57564 Summary: regmove switched operands? Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug c++/57565] New: variadic template and type inference failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57565 Bug ID: 57565 Summary: variadic template and type inference failure Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/57564] regmove switched operands?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57564 --- Comment #1 from ncahill_alt at yahoo dot com --- Also present in 4.8.0, not in 4.7.3.

[Bug c++/55149] capturing VLA in lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55149 --- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini --- PR57408 seems related.

[Bug c++/57565] variadic template and type inference failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57565 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/57566] New: [C++11][constexpr] static temporaries bound recursively in reference constant expressions don't get initialized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57566 Bug ID: 57566 Summary: [C++11][constexpr] static temporaries bound recursively in reference constant expressions don't get initialized Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0

[Bug c++/57565] variadic template and type inference failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57565 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONF